“Thanks to your democratic laws, we will overtake you; thanks to your religous laws, we will rule over you.” –Imam of Izmir (Citation according to Gernot Facius, DIE WELT, 6 October 2001)
The Example of Denmark
The Islamization of Europe is in full swing. The majority of Europeans are helpless against this development. They are informed neither about the true essence of Islam, nor about the background of Islamic politics on European soil. The Muslims have not come to integrate into European societies. Their goal is the transformation of Europe into an Islamic realm where only Shari’a, the law of Islam, will rule.
(An Essay by Michael Mannheimer, Second Revision, Germany, German original published in August 2009 (see also PI-PDF). The PDF-version of the English translation by Anders Denken, you find here. Contact: M.Mannheimer@gmx.net)
This series of documents brings important information to light with regard to this issue with the hope that the expanionist desires of the Muslims and their supporters in the Western Elite will be met with much needed resistance.
Representation of Arabic names in English vary. The following names are listed so that the reader will recognize these “familiar” terms according to how they have learned them.
Quran = Koran
Muhammad = Mohammed
The German term O-Ton refers to an original recording or saying, according to German Wikipedia.
Part 1: The Political, Ideological and Religious Background Behind the Islamization of Europe
The Plan of the Left for Islamization — and its persistent realization to this day At the beginning of the 90s, the representative of Bündnis90/Die Grünen (Coalition90/Greenpeace) for German-French Europe and one of the leading leftwing politicians, Daniel Cohn-Bendit, announced accordingly the following:
“We, the Greens (Green Party), must strive to this end that as many foreigners as possible be brought to Germany. If they are in Germany, we must fight for their right to vote. Once we have achieved this, then we have the segment of voters we need to change this republic.”
Jürgen Trittin, Federal Minister for Environment, Natural Protection and Reactor Security under the chancellorship of Schröder (1998-2005), and then after October 2005 the Federal Minister for Consumer Protection, Nutrition and Agriculture has preserved his 1968 Peace Movement spirit [68er spirit] to this present day. Even to this day he is beholden to his prior membership in the Maoist “Communist Federation” (Kommunistischen Bund [KB]) (Their motto being: “Never again Germany!”). Regarding this, he says:
“This is no sin of the youth . I believe that there are even more things that a person can stand for to this day…”
In the context of this declaration is Trittin’s interesting opinion regarding the concept of democratic elections. They have not so much to do with the organization of parliamentarian majorities, but much more the attaining for oneself the power of “dominant minorities and the leadership of opinion”.
This is nothing short of post-Communist propagation of the Leninist Doctrine of a Dictatorship of the Proletariat on the part of a prominent German politician . That was the same Communist justification for decades-long oppression of their citizens through a radical, arrogant and above all decidedly leftwing-Fascist minority. With that same strategy of opinion control that has been successful until now, Trittin has sketched out a much more penetrating plan regarding the real relationships of power among western European countries. Even the political scientists have not been able to achieve this with their long-winded analyses. It is true that parliamentary power lies mostly in the conservative parties in Europe. However, the leadership of opinion of which Tritten speaks, and the power that arises there has been overwhelmingly in the hands of highly organized, primarily left-oriented minorities (Keyword: leftwing [fascist] opinion cartel) who still find themselves to be unchallenged regarding what is politically correct and what isn’t. We will come to speak more often of this.
Jilted politicians seek for themselves another people How a political satire eventually becomes reality Let us come to alpha-beast of the Greens (Greenpeace), the German Joschka Fischer, who was long-time chief of his party and served as the previous German Minister of the Exterior. In his youth he was a militant enemy of his country, a police-fighter, RAF-sympathiser and a hater of the western system. He blew the same horn as his party-friend and fighting companion Cohn-Bendit. Fischer (“I discover more and more how much I have remained a Marxist.”) reveals the political intentions behind massive immigration in his book with the revealing title “Germany – The Risk” (1994). The content of this book was summed up in the “WELT” newspaper as follows: “Germany must be hemmed in without, and within she must be heterogenized by influx (of foreigners) or quasi “thinned out.” (Miriam Lau: “Risiko Deutschland (Risk Germany)” — Joschka Fischer in Bedrängnis. In: Welt-Online, 7 February 2005)
In plain language, the idea of a voter fraud of historical proportions was crafted, the result being a stealthily and carefully executed plan with a determined result. In 1960 only 600,000 Muslims lived in all of Europe, however today there are already over 30 million, and the greatest mass immigration in the history of man continues unabated. Each year 1 million new Muslim immigrants stream into Europe. This is done legally through the reunification of families, the process of asylum, or they come as “political fugitives” of their Islamic countries where human rights are trodden underfoot. Ever and again they receive residency rights, ever more receiving European citizenship without having to accede to rudimentary skills of culture, education or employment necessary to cope with the requirements of high-tech European society.
But they haven’t come here to integrate into Western society. This is forbidden by their faith as well as their religious leaders who are highly organized and have long since held the real leadership over European muslims. Their primary political goal is to complete what their religion, what Allah has commanded: the rule over all “infidels” in this world. This is what it says in the Koran; this is what their prophet (Muhammad) also commands. And this is what every representative of Muslims strives for in every European country, regardless of what party they belong to.
World Domination is the principal goal of Islam
Whether it be Vural Öger (German-Turkish SPD-Representative), whether Boumediennes (former Algerian head of state), whether Izbetbegovic†† (Bosnian expresident), whether Erbakan (former Turkish prime minister), or whether it be Ibrahim El-Zayat, (President of the Islamic Fellowship in Germany): every one of them knows well the mandate for world conquest, and every one of them is applying every bit of power they have to accomplish this end.
Only Western Do-Gooders and the Leftist Elite insistently refuse to acknowledge the Islamic push for world dominance, for they naively follow the motto of do-gooders and good-willers who think that that which is not allowed to exist simply cannot exist. But let it be said to all who refuse to accept reality: the Muslim doesn’t care one iota what the non-Muslim thinks of him. What Islam entails, what it really means, every Muslim understands perfectly. To express it coarsely, Western ideals of morality or other values are considered rubbish. Khomeini, among others, formulated this idea unambiguously when he said “The rule over the world is the end goal of Islam”.
This statement is confirmed by all who know Islam. The German-Syrian orientalist and Islamic scientist, Bassam Tibi, says in addition:
Everywhere, in that place where Muslims live, Islam claims for itself the sole owner of validity (dissenting ideas are invalid).”
Even the Chief of Police in Cologne – bound to the requirements of his office not to take positions – concluded soberly as a result of unhindered border openings and the high birth rate of Islamic people that the German State will be overtaken in 2030. Since Islam is striving for world dominance, it could come to a bloody civil war in Germany and Europe.
His colleague in Vienna, Alfred Ellinger, President of the Association of Austrian Criminologists (Vereinigung österreichischer Kriminalisten), sees it the same way. In a comment regarding the state of Europe in connection with Islam, he writes:
“A Moslem has the duty to defend his territory against attacks of infidels and at the same time to destroy the world of the infidels to the end that Islam will rule the whole globe. Jihad comes to an end only when all people have either accepted the Islamic faith or have bowed to its authority. “The border of Islam is the border of the world.”
Also, the Turk Metin Kaplan who is smiled upon as the “Caliph of Cologne,” founder of the militant Muslim organization “Caliph-State,” Hater of Jews and Israel, and a recognized fugitive (Asylbewerber), proclaimed in countless sermons the creation of an “Islamic Theocracy Germany” and prophesied the soon coming of Islamic world dominance (Hakki Akduman: “Der “Kalif von Köln (The Caliph of Cologne)”, Metin Kaplan”, AP). At the end of 2008, the Islamic scholar of Indian origin, T.K. Abdullah declared in an open presentation in Qatar the soon takeover of the world by Islam after Communism and Capitalism have finally failed (The Peninsular, 15 November 2008).
Adolf Hitler himself had only a marginal understanding of Islam, but he collaborated with the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem in order to build a death camp for the Jews living in Palestine. Nevertheless, he was able to grasp the Islamic charge of world dominance better than most modern educated Europeans can. “If we had become Mohammedans, we would have owned the world today.” (Adolf Hitler, cited in “Von Allah zum Terror? (Allah to Terror)” by Hans-Peter Raddatz, Herbig, Munich 2002, 2nd Printing, ISBN 377662289X)
Muslims everywhere are working toward the takeover of power, and neither an ostensible leftwing opinion or a Green opinion can hold them back. Muslim Coalition90/Grünen (Bündnis90/Greenpeace) politician Nargess Eskandari-Grünberg expressed this fact in an Education and Integration Caucus when a Frankfurt citizen complained about the overwhelming contingent of foreigners in his part of the city. “Migration is a fact in Frankfurt. If that makes you uncomfortable, then you need to move somewhere else,” she said (CANAN TOPÇU: “Wie eine Gebetsmühle (Like a Prayer Mill)”, in: Frankfurter Rundschau on 13 November 2007).
Eskandari-Grünberg, born in 1965 in Tehran, and in 1985 she fled Iran as a political fugitive and was granted Asylum in Germany. How European Politicians are executing Policies against their Constituents with the help of Muslim Voter Policy The influence of Muslims in European daily politics and their political power have become overwhelming in the mean time. Be reminded of Gerhard Schröder’s reelection bid (O-Ton Schröder: “Yes, I am a Marxist!”), just how he won with a razor thin majority of votes. With the possible threat of a loss before his eyes, Schröder put his bets into the Turkish vote and promised that, under his watch, the way would be irrevocably cleared for the EU-membership of Islamic Turkey. This message was geared to the approx. 600,000 naturalized Islamic immigrants, the majority being of Turkish origin and on whom Schröder had placed his hopes. His approach was successful. Thanks to the Turkish-German voters who gave the majority of their votes to Schöder, the SPD and Greenpeace parties were able to garner a noteworthy mandate majority, an advantage of a whole 6,027 votes was just enough to get him reelected to the Chancellorship (SPIEGEL 27/2008, page 18). This, however, was achieved against the will of the German people (which thing was kept silent), for without the votes of the naturalized Turkish-German immigrants Schröder would have lost this election to the opposition by a margin of over 1/2 million votes. Imagine this: politicians practicing politics against their own people. This is the very thing that Cohn-Bendit called for, and it is the implementation of the same plan all over Europe by the leftwing power cartel that is calling for the “thinning out” of the voter proportion that native Europeans have. And now, the fruit of this endeavor is starting to show.
The shifting around of population groups is by no means a novel invention. As a means of “non-military” final solution, this shift has been accomplished in foreign areas that were already occupied, or perhaps the conquered people had their original populations replaced over time by means of “gentler” methods of crowding out until the original population would no longer be there. A fine example in recent history is North Cyprus. Occupied since 1974 by Turkey, hundreds of thousands of Anatolian mainland Turks have been placed there. The result today is that the relationship between Greek and Turkish Cypriots has shifted dramatically in favor of the erstwhile Turkish minority.
An example is Tibet: This giant, autonomous region of 1.2 million square kilometers (Germany’s area by comparison covers only 350,000 square kilometers) became a Chinese occupation in the 1950s. Since then, China has seen to it that millions of Chinese move to Tibet, so that in the meantime Tibetans have become the minority in their own land. In both of these cases the thing that holds true is that the redistribution of population groups was guided by the authority of the occupying power, and indeed the result was logically to the advantage of the ethnic group of that occupying power.
Europe, on the other hand, is not occupied by any external force, but in spite of this fact, this continent finds itself in the throes of one of the greatest demographic upheavals in its history by means of new and mostly Muslim ethnic groups that are successfully replacing indigenous Europeans. This upheaval has been steered by Europe’s OWN politicians and was programmed long ago to stand against the interests and needs of native Europeans. Those politicians have neither asked their constituents for permission regarding this issue, nor do they react to the growing unrest of the European people because such a mass immigration has led to the fact that Europe, as the Europeans have known it, is becoming less recognizable, that in many places Europeans have become foreigners in their own land, and at the beginning they have not wanted this large influx. This immigration policy carries with it all the signs of a totalitarian concept of rule by the political elite of Europe and harks back to the giant population shifts in the Soviet Union and communist China under Stalin and Mao. These shifts were decided in the circle of a small political group and were carried out without one single referendum to the indigenous people involved.
The plain and short: with regard to Europe, the leftwing/green power complex has been behaving for a while now in certain essential political core areas (i.e. migration, EU expansion, citizenship) in a way that shows like an external occupational force. Since those who have been responsible for this mass immigration have been unable to win over their home-grown European voters to this political work, they have set out to occupy their own lands by millions of people with a foreign language, culture and religion.mTheir intention, in the mean time, is to “thin out” the European portion of the population, and eventually to disempower them altogether.
This is nothing short of a new form of “ethnic cleansing.” Moreover, there are certain perverse warning signs: No controlling external occupying force, but rather a small and determined minority inside the indigenous population; this ruling minority will meanwhile and eventually in the long term exchange the current population with those who promise a stronger support of their policies. The leftwing/Green master plan is already showing its desired results. As an example, in Brussels, Milan and Oslo, the name “Mohammed” is now the most common name given to newborns. In England the traditionally most common name was “Jack.” However, in the meantime “Mohammed” has taken the lead. In 2004 in Holland, 56% of all the children and youth in the large cities were foreigners, most of them Muslim.
In Switzerland, the statistics for 2040 show a 76% portion of the population to be Muslim, assuming the policies of this Alpine country do not change. According to an Austrian study, in 2051, every third Austrian pupil will be a Muslim. A study by the Islamic Archive in Soest (2006) regarding developments of the German population predicts that in 2045, the German population will stand at 51.72 million Muslims in contrast to only 45 million native Germans. A fact that has already been carefully calculated by the leading Muslim authorities for accomplishing the takeover of power in that most important country in Europe.