<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PI Series: Reasoning with Muslims &#8212; but how?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pi-news.org/2010/03/pi-series-reasoning-with-muslims-but-how/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pi-news.org/2010/03/pi-series-reasoning-with-muslims-but-how/</link>
	<description>Against the Mainstream · Pro-American · Pro-Israel · Against the Islamisation of Europe · For Fundamental Laws and Human Rights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 00:19:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Javelin Marketing Co Statement &#187; Blog Archive &#187; I always argue with the Constitution</title>
		<link>http://www.pi-news.org/2010/03/pi-series-reasoning-with-muslims-but-how/comment-page-1/#comment-3091</link>
		<dc:creator>Javelin Marketing Co Statement &#187; Blog Archive &#187; I always argue with the Constitution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pi-news.org/?p=1385#comment-3091</guid>
		<description>[...] Valette regarding the PI Series &#8220;Reasoning with Muslims &#8212; but how&#8221; / Translation: Anders [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Valette regarding the PI Series &#8220;Reasoning with Muslims &#8212; but how&#8221; / Translation: Anders [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Javelin Marketing Co Statement &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Comparisons with Jews Lack Basic Principles</title>
		<link>http://www.pi-news.org/2010/03/pi-series-reasoning-with-muslims-but-how/comment-page-1/#comment-3090</link>
		<dc:creator>Javelin Marketing Co Statement &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Comparisons with Jews Lack Basic Principles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pi-news.org/?p=1385#comment-3090</guid>
		<description>[...] by Ursula, regarding the PI series &#8220;Reasoning with Muslims &#8212; but how?&#8221; / Translation: Anders [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by Ursula, regarding the PI series &#8220;Reasoning with Muslims &#8212; but how?&#8221; / Translation: Anders [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DP111</title>
		<link>http://www.pi-news.org/2010/03/pi-series-reasoning-with-muslims-but-how/comment-page-1/#comment-3026</link>
		<dc:creator>DP111</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pi-news.org/?p=1385#comment-3026</guid>
		<description>The best way to debate about Islam with Muslims, if forced to,  is to stick to the central feature of Islam that affects us - sharia. Get Muslims to disavow sharia as their strategic goal in the West, then you have won. But then go on with the argument that as Muslims are permitted to lie to infidels when it comes to Islam, your Muslim debater, with all respect, cannot be trusted. 
 
Therefore, it is the best interest of all, that Muslims live in a Muslim country where their sharia is the law, and their customs are not regarded barbaric.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best way to debate about Islam with Muslims, if forced to,  is to stick to the central feature of Islam that affects us &#8211; sharia. Get Muslims to disavow sharia as their strategic goal in the West, then you have won. But then go on with the argument that as Muslims are permitted to lie to infidels when it comes to Islam, your Muslim debater, with all respect, cannot be trusted. </p>
<p>Therefore, it is the best interest of all, that Muslims live in a Muslim country where their sharia is the law, and their customs are not regarded barbaric.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethnographies of Moral Reasoning: Living Paradoxes of a Global Age &#124; Ebook Online Free</title>
		<link>http://www.pi-news.org/2010/03/pi-series-reasoning-with-muslims-but-how/comment-page-1/#comment-3025</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethnographies of Moral Reasoning: Living Paradoxes of a Global Age &#124; Ebook Online Free</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pi-news.org/?p=1385#comment-3025</guid>
		<description>[...] PI Series: Reasoning with Muslims — but how? &#8211; Politically &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PI Series: Reasoning with Muslims — but how? &#8211; Politically &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bloody Mary</title>
		<link>http://www.pi-news.org/2010/03/pi-series-reasoning-with-muslims-but-how/comment-page-1/#comment-3019</link>
		<dc:creator>Bloody Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pi-news.org/?p=1385#comment-3019</guid>
		<description>Reasoning with muslims? FORGET IT! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reasoning with muslims? FORGET IT!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DP111</title>
		<link>http://www.pi-news.org/2010/03/pi-series-reasoning-with-muslims-but-how/comment-page-1/#comment-3018</link>
		<dc:creator>DP111</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 23:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pi-news.org/?p=1385#comment-3018</guid>
		<description>cudgels and carrots ... islamic jihad. 
 
now that stealth jihad and the muslim insinuation into western culture seems to be going nicely for them, the question of whether islam will choose to halt terrorist jihad probably has occurred to some. 
 
so, will islam relax and let stealth/political/demographic carry the banner of islam, and will islam abandon terror jihad? 
 
i think not. 
 
why should they?  they seem to be doing well with both lines of attack upon the west, and the fact of terror seems not to slow the political advance at all.  indeed, the more people they blow up and mutilate, the more the western mainstream media and intellectual elite cow to them, and fawn for their approval. 
 
and, this is the key. 
 
terrorism serves an odd dual role, which roles, upon first blush, seem antithetical. 
 
but, terrorism is both the cudgel and the carrot which drives the success of the stealth/political/demographical attacks of islam upon the west. 
 
terrorism frightens western intellectual elites.  since these elites believe in nothing, the specter of annihilationists willing to kill others while killing themselves is truly incomprehensible to the west, and truly frightening.  to the euro warm fuzzy socialists, raised upon the dual propositions that nothing is worth killing for, and, deeply convinced in their own empty hearts that if that is true than nothing, surely nothing, can be worth dying for, such fanaticism as display by the islamic terrorist is truly frightening. 
 
the euro&#8217;s will concede anything to avoid a fight.  they are, simply put, dickless cowards. 
 
so, terrorism and stealth jihad are highly synergistic to islam. 
 
but, the west, through its own devices, has made terrorism its own intellectual carrot by which it seems reasonable to offer more and more concessions to the muslim hordes who press them so.  because they have convinced themselves, the euros, that the muzzies are all in fact just like us, and if they are treated decently and given a &#8220;share of the pie,&#8221; then they will act reasonably. 
 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://wintersoldier2008.typepad.com/summer_patriot_winter_sol/2010/03/cudgels-and-carrots-islamic-jihad.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://wintersoldier2008.typepad.com/summer_patri...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cudgels and carrots &#8230; islamic jihad. </p>
<p>now that stealth jihad and the muslim insinuation into western culture seems to be going nicely for them, the question of whether islam will choose to halt terrorist jihad probably has occurred to some. </p>
<p>so, will islam relax and let stealth/political/demographic carry the banner of islam, and will islam abandon terror jihad? </p>
<p>i think not. </p>
<p>why should they?  they seem to be doing well with both lines of attack upon the west, and the fact of terror seems not to slow the political advance at all.  indeed, the more people they blow up and mutilate, the more the western mainstream media and intellectual elite cow to them, and fawn for their approval. </p>
<p>and, this is the key. </p>
<p>terrorism serves an odd dual role, which roles, upon first blush, seem antithetical. </p>
<p>but, terrorism is both the cudgel and the carrot which drives the success of the stealth/political/demographical attacks of islam upon the west. </p>
<p>terrorism frightens western intellectual elites.  since these elites believe in nothing, the specter of annihilationists willing to kill others while killing themselves is truly incomprehensible to the west, and truly frightening.  to the euro warm fuzzy socialists, raised upon the dual propositions that nothing is worth killing for, and, deeply convinced in their own empty hearts that if that is true than nothing, surely nothing, can be worth dying for, such fanaticism as display by the islamic terrorist is truly frightening. </p>
<p>the euro&rsquo;s will concede anything to avoid a fight.  they are, simply put, dickless cowards. </p>
<p>so, terrorism and stealth jihad are highly synergistic to islam. </p>
<p>but, the west, through its own devices, has made terrorism its own intellectual carrot by which it seems reasonable to offer more and more concessions to the muslim hordes who press them so.  because they have convinced themselves, the euros, that the muzzies are all in fact just like us, and if they are treated decently and given a &ldquo;share of the pie,&rdquo; then they will act reasonably. </p>
<p><a href="http://wintersoldier2008.typepad.com/summer_patriot_winter_sol/2010/03/cudgels-and-carrots-islamic-jihad.html" target="_blank">http://wintersoldier2008.typepad.com/summer_patri&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DP111</title>
		<link>http://www.pi-news.org/2010/03/pi-series-reasoning-with-muslims-but-how/comment-page-1/#comment-3017</link>
		<dc:creator>DP111</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 23:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pi-news.org/?p=1385#comment-3017</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;cudgels and carrots ... islamic jihad.&lt;/b&gt; 
 
now that stealth jihad and the muslim insinuation into western culture seems to be going nicely for them, the question of whether islam will choose to halt terrorist jihad probably has occurred to some. 
 
so, will islam relax and let stealth/political/demographic carry the banner of islam, and will islam abandon terror jihad? 
 
i think not. 
 
why should they?  they seem to be doing well with both lines of attack upon the west, and the fact of terror seems not to slow the political advance at all.  indeed, the more people they blow up and mutilate, the more the western mainstream media and intellectual elite cow to them, and fawn for their approval. 
 
and, this is the key. 
 
terrorism serves an odd dual role, which roles, upon first blush, seem antithetical. 
 
but, terrorism is both the cudgel and the carrot which drives the success of the stealth/political/demographical attacks of islam upon the west. 
 
terrorism frightens western intellectual elites.  since these elites believe in nothing, the specter of annihilationists willing to kill others while killing themselves is truly incomprehensible to the west, and truly frightening.  to the euro warm fuzzy socialists, raised upon the dual propositions that nothing is worth killing for, and, deeply convinced in their own empty hearts that if that is true than nothing, surely nothing, can be worth dying for, such fanaticism as display by the islamic terrorist is truly frightening. 
 
the euro&#8217;s will concede anything to avoid a fight.  they are, simply put, dickless cowards. 
 
so, terrorism and stealth jihad are highly synergistic to islam. 
 
but, the west, through its own devices, has made terrorism its own intellectual carrot by which it seems reasonable to offer more and more concessions to the muslim hordes who press them so.  because they have convinced themselves, the euros, that the muzzies are all in fact just like us, and if they are treated decently and given a &#8220;share of the pie,&#8221; then they will act reasonably. 
 
READ IT ALL 
 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://wintersoldier2008.typepad.com/summer_patriot_winter_sol/2010/03/cudgels-and-carrots-islamic-jihad.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://wintersoldier2008.typepad.com/summer_patri...&lt;/a&gt; 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>cudgels and carrots &#8230; islamic jihad.</b> </p>
<p>now that stealth jihad and the muslim insinuation into western culture seems to be going nicely for them, the question of whether islam will choose to halt terrorist jihad probably has occurred to some. </p>
<p>so, will islam relax and let stealth/political/demographic carry the banner of islam, and will islam abandon terror jihad? </p>
<p>i think not. </p>
<p>why should they?  they seem to be doing well with both lines of attack upon the west, and the fact of terror seems not to slow the political advance at all.  indeed, the more people they blow up and mutilate, the more the western mainstream media and intellectual elite cow to them, and fawn for their approval. </p>
<p>and, this is the key. </p>
<p>terrorism serves an odd dual role, which roles, upon first blush, seem antithetical. </p>
<p>but, terrorism is both the cudgel and the carrot which drives the success of the stealth/political/demographical attacks of islam upon the west. </p>
<p>terrorism frightens western intellectual elites.  since these elites believe in nothing, the specter of annihilationists willing to kill others while killing themselves is truly incomprehensible to the west, and truly frightening.  to the euro warm fuzzy socialists, raised upon the dual propositions that nothing is worth killing for, and, deeply convinced in their own empty hearts that if that is true than nothing, surely nothing, can be worth dying for, such fanaticism as display by the islamic terrorist is truly frightening. </p>
<p>the euro&rsquo;s will concede anything to avoid a fight.  they are, simply put, dickless cowards. </p>
<p>so, terrorism and stealth jihad are highly synergistic to islam. </p>
<p>but, the west, through its own devices, has made terrorism its own intellectual carrot by which it seems reasonable to offer more and more concessions to the muslim hordes who press them so.  because they have convinced themselves, the euros, that the muzzies are all in fact just like us, and if they are treated decently and given a &ldquo;share of the pie,&rdquo; then they will act reasonably. </p>
<p>READ IT ALL </p>
<p><a href="http://wintersoldier2008.typepad.com/summer_patriot_winter_sol/2010/03/cudgels-and-carrots-islamic-jihad.html" target="_blank">http://wintersoldier2008.typepad.com/summer_patri&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DP111</title>
		<link>http://www.pi-news.org/2010/03/pi-series-reasoning-with-muslims-but-how/comment-page-1/#comment-3015</link>
		<dc:creator>DP111</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pi-news.org/?p=1385#comment-3015</guid>
		<description>One of the best critical blogs on Islam is Faithfreedom.org 
 
Another is Answering Islam. 
 
But as I said earlier, it is a waste of time and energy. It has been tried by the best, such as Ali Sena, Ibn Warraq, Anwar Hussain, to no avail.  
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the best critical blogs on Islam is Faithfreedom.org </p>
<p>Another is Answering Islam. </p>
<p>But as I said earlier, it is a waste of time and energy. It has been tried by the best, such as Ali Sena, Ibn Warraq, Anwar Hussain, to no avail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DP111</title>
		<link>http://www.pi-news.org/2010/03/pi-series-reasoning-with-muslims-but-how/comment-page-1/#comment-3014</link>
		<dc:creator>DP111</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pi-news.org/?p=1385#comment-3014</guid>
		<description>Discussion with Muslims is pointless. Even if you win the argument it will serves no purpose, as the command to implement sharia worldwide is not dependent on winning a debating point, but a divine order from allah - Muslims believe that, and as it is a belief, it cannot be argued with. 
 
The rest of their beliefs are really of no concern of ours. All that matters is, can we debate Muslims to change the Koran so that sharia is not mandated? We cant.   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Discussion with Muslims is pointless. Even if you win the argument it will serves no purpose, as the command to implement sharia worldwide is not dependent on winning a debating point, but a divine order from allah &#8211; Muslims believe that, and as it is a belief, it cannot be argued with. </p>
<p>The rest of their beliefs are really of no concern of ours. All that matters is, can we debate Muslims to change the Koran so that sharia is not mandated? We cant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.pi-news.org/2010/03/pi-series-reasoning-with-muslims-but-how/feed/ ) in 0.23524 seconds, on Feb 8th, 2012 at 4:43 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 8th, 2012 at 5:43 am UTC -->
