Now, Blick is rightfully upset: The Swiss Federal Assembly has made its pronouncement against the ban on burkas because (1) they are uncommon, and (2) the women involved would otherwise be prisoners in their own homes. An interesting logic! With this kind of reasoning, legal infractions don’t matter if they are uncommon, and one can get blanket approval for an acceptable legal offense (in this case, for robbery of freedom).

Blick writes:

The Federal Assembly has determined to determine no Burka ban. The foundation for this non-determination is as follows: First, there are at most 100 women who wear full-body covering; second, without their covering, these women would be “cloistered in their homes.”

As to point one: In the eyes of the Assembly, the legal setting is dependent upon the number of those affected by a law.

By this reasoning, laws don’t arise from a matter at hand, but rather from how frequently the matter occurs. Each year, Switzerland counts only 60 premeditated murders in accordance with Article 111 of the Criminal Law Book. Is this particular law necessary then?

As to point two: The Assembly goes on the premise that some Muslim women without their burkas will be closed up in their own homes, thereby robbing them of their freedom. And that Muslim men commit the offense of robbing them of freedom, if the Swiss law is not set up according to the will of their religious demands of ruling over their women.

The Assembly, however, is willing for them — and in hasty obedience have decided to do without a ban on burkas.

Robbery of freedom is an official offence. That means the state has to pursue infractions against the law officially, even without complainants. The same applies to marital rape. The Swiss State of Freedom and Justice also has laws that reach into the private sphere, and even the intimate sphere, that can affect relationships and family. Apparently they don’t apply to the Islamic oppression of women. These offenses are covered under the cloak of cultural tolerance. That means that the legal protection of the woman applies only to non-Muslim women.

Other countries — other customs — it is with this multi-culti claptrap that the Federal Assembly has switched off one of the most meaningful values of our free civilization: the equality of women. The customs of other countries can be lived out among us, contrary to justice and law!

Total body covering is the mobile prison for Islamic women, even when they aren’t locked up at home. As their husbands — their lords — understand it, these women belong to them, they are bondslaves.

Bondslavery in Switzerland, the Federal Assembly condones it.

(Contributor: Willi, Translation: Anders Denken)

Now, Blick is rightfully upset: The Swiss Federal Assembly has made its pronouncement against the ban on burkas because (1) they are uncommon, and (2) the women involved would otherwise be prisoners in their own homes. An interesting logic! With this kind of reasoning, legal infractions don\'t matter if they are uncommon, and one ...

PI, 09. Mar 2010 |  Print This Post |  Email This Post | post a comment    
Kategorie: Dhimmitude, Islam, Switzerland;

 Loading ...

look up...