Last Thursday, another large Islam critical conference took place in Munich. Probably Germany’s bravest Journalist, Michael Mannheimer, was the showstopper who gave the presentation “Eurabia — the Capitulation of Europe to Islam.” For two and a half hours, he delivered highly interesting facts that present new information for well-read Islam critics.
The auditorium was well filled with 140 people. Interestingly enough, this time our best known Muslims that are usually present at each Islam event were missing. Either they were away on Easter holiday, or they knew that Michael Mannheimer does not easily let himself get tripped up. His profound knowledge of the Quran and his experiences during his 15-year stint as a foreign correspondent have made him a wise old owl in the subject of Islam. One who has survived intensely dangerous situations in Pakistan does not let himself be deceived by Muslim Taquiyya ever again.
In spite of the long presentation, not one soul left the room before the end of the meeting. For the facts that Mannheimer delivered by means of well illustrated slides hit the ears of the hearers like strokes of a whip. The journalist with a quarter century experience knows nothing of evasive maneuvers. Michael Mannheimer minces no words. In the course of his life he has dealt repeatedly with totalitarian ideologies. Before 9/11 he was occupied with the threat of communism. After the worst terror attack in the history of mankind, he asked himself how the planning of this horrible attack could be made in Germany of all places, and moreover how it could be carried out in so-called prayer houses. So he began to engage himself in the subject of Islam. His accumulated insight from almost a decade of journalistic research was now drumming out upon the assembly.
In light of the abundance of declarations from Muslim functionaries and politicians, there is no doubt what organized Islam has in mind for Europe: Subjugation under the laws of a 1400-year-old ideology. Mannheimer supported this with a small assortment of striking citations:
Since the speaker has an outstanding knowledge of Islam and is also best-informed about the life of the prophet Muhammad, he demonstrated the conquering will of Muslims with the appropriate Quran declarations:
This Islamization is a desired development by certain influential circles to dissolve European national states gradually and meld them into a single multicultural unit.
Prominent Islam scientists like Prof. Bernhard Lewis see in this massive immigration the third historical wave of attacks on Europe by the Muslims:
Up to this point, this migration to Europe has played out easily, for broad societal circles have been supporting Muslim immigration. Besides broad groups of Left-Green politicians, even churches and unions are engaged as uncritically as possible.
The Quran is the greatest hindrance to integration for Muslims in Europe. For many passages very clearly demand segregation from non-Muslims:
This dis-integration is very pointedly demanded by many Muslim associations such as Milli Görüs:
Michael Mannheimer has compiled many revealing declarations of Muslim representatives from the largest assortment of countries that let no doubt arise concerning the mind-set of these circles.
One of the largest problems the West sees itself confronted with is the overpowering sentiment of solidarity among Muslims. This hinders identification with the guest country and leads to global initiatives in case of tensions.
The feeling of togetherness among Muslims transcends by far their solidarity with the guest country. Thus, for example, the Muslim Green politician from Denmark, Asmaa Abdol-Hamid, has publically summoned her fellow believers in Iraq to violent resistance against the Danish soldiers:
Mannheimer then brought many examples of Islamization events from all of Europe, for example, the horrendous overproportional rate of Muslim rapes of Scandinavian women. At the same time, it is an Islamic teaching to bring as many descendents as possible into the world in order to support the spread of Islam.
Since, according to the statistics in Norway, “non-Western immigrants” are ten times more likely to land in the social system while hard-working Chinese or Indians can be found among this index, this causes the whole dimension of the Muslim problem to become very conspicuous.
In addition, the unbearable situation is worsening in any case because of the calls of radical Imams for the damaging of Western society. Thus, Imam Ahmed Salam in the Netherlands has called for tax fraud in order to speed up the collapse of the country:
The keeping of Sharia laws is being demanded more and more often and stringently. Thus, the Imam of Rotterdam has indicated that homosexuals are a disease as well as a “danger to the continuing existence of society,” and demanded to “hang them publicly”:
The transormation of Dutch society is progressing rapidly. Thus a Bible museum in Nijmwegen has become a Quran museum with finances from the gulf state of Oman.
The radical Islamist preacher Abu Hamsa al-Masri in London demonstrates this rather crudely, for he perceives his guest country Great Britain as somewhat like “the inside of a toilet.” And soon a “Muslim ruler” will sit in the White House:
Meanwhile, in France there are over 1,000 no go areas where even the police dare not go. The riots back in the year 2006 brought to mind situations akin to civil war. Interestingly enough, wherever they broke out all over the country, it was in the vicinity of mosques.
2005 in Marseille, the pitiful Franco-Tunisian Ghofrane Haddaoui was the first woman stoned in Europe:
In Spain, the Imam Muhammad Kamal Mustafa from the mosque in Fuengirola on the Costa del Sol published the book “Women in Islam” in which he described the proper beating of women.
Ex-Muslim Magdi Allam has been urgently warning the Italians for years about Islamization. Mosques are a “terror network”, and political correctness will be the shovel with which they will bury themselves.
In 1994, a videocasette containing the following message was sold by the Islamic “Culture” Institute in Milan: “Terrorism against the enemies of God is duty in our religion. Our Islam is the religion of violence:”
In Switzerland, a Muslim portion of the population of 76% has been predicted by the year 2040.
Therefore, it is only sensible that the largest Islamic center in Europe should come into existence in Bern for the price of 80 million Francs.
In Austria, the Viennese Imam Adnan Ibrahim was so free as to stir things up in the Arabic language on his homepage. The saying there was that Muslim men are not to enter into matrimony with Christian women, since that would bring “foreign blood to our descendants,” which is a “social crime.” Besides that, he indicated that all countries where Muslims hold “no power or rulership” are “lands of war.” His misfortune was that somebody took the trouble to translate these texts. So, in 2006, a charge was made against him for incitement to terrorism.
Der Vorsitzende der Österreichischen Kriminalbeamten Alfred Ellinger habe sich 2007 äußerst skeptisch angesichts des Umfangs der islamischen Einwanderung geäußert und von einem künftigen „Schlachtfeld Europa“ gesprochen:
The head of the Austrian Criminal Agency, Alfred Ellinger, in 2007 expressed extreme skepticism in the face of the extensiveness of Islamic immigration and spoke of a coming “Battlefield Europe.”
For Germany, Prognoses from Wallstreet online foresee a tipping of the majority proportion in the year 2051.
Studies about the criminality of immigrants are willingly suppressed by politicians and media. Michael Mannheimer has analyzed the conviction statistics from 2004 that document the startling developments:
The Hessen Report on the Security of the Constitution from the year 2004 comes to a sobering conclusion:
According to Islamic notion, the world is divided into the house of Islam and the house of war. The ultimate goal of all efforts must be to Islamize the whole world.
The Quran delivers the license, so to speak, for killing in this proposition:
Various citations from the Islamic world leave nothing out in their clarity. Thus Daniel Pipes justly makes a sobering conclusion:
In this situation parallels can be drawn with the time in which Hitler came to power in Germany. Mannheimer cites the historian Karl Dietrich Bracher:
“Paralysis and corruption of a free political system, if nothing else, were the results of confused standards, weakened readiness in defense and a false illusion about tolerance in the face of enemies of democracy.”
After the presentation there followed yet another hour of discussion in which numerous inquiries were made. How could it be that the danger of Islamization is still being trivialized in spite of the earth-shaking state of facts in the open. Mannheimer ascertained that there are simply too many ideologically settled left-wing Green agents of persuasion in politics and media. The deciding positions in the press landscape have been infiltrated by upwards of 70% left-wing Green 60s-Era individuals. And many conservative oriented powers simply feared violent reactions from the fundamental Muslim scene. This influences the treatment and expressions of many politicians. Besides this, some had already had their eyes on future voter blocs, and Muslims would build a future power potential in the face of demographic shifts. And ultimately the fear of future diplomatic entanglements with the Islamic world that one must depend on because of oil shipments and economic interdependence present a possibly higher threshold of suppression against speaking clearly against a power-oriented violence-praising ideology.
Of course the question was asked what could be done about it. Mannheimer urgently appealed to the civil courage of the citizens to get organized, as the citizen initiative Pax Europa and in the local PI groups have done by way of example. In the future, the ability to campaign with demonstrations and announcements will need to be proved. Politicians must feel that the people are developing a strong movement that can no longer be underestimated. Only when the will of citizens is articulated must politicians take consideration of it. If everything continues to run as quietly as it has so far, then there is also no compulsion to act by those responsible in our society. Mannheimer also lamented that there is still no Geert Wilders among us. But there has already been a positive development in that now there is a “Stop the Left Trend” initiative in the Union.
In conclusion, the critical note has to be made that throughout the hall there were still a few empty places. From this standpoint, there was no further development in comparison with the first conference event. Normally the room would have exploded at the seams for this top-class speaker. But our impression even from the information booths in the Munich pedestrian zone confirmed: The problem of Islam has indeed landed on the personal radar screen with many people. But as long as one’s life is not touched, there will be no further engagement. At least the radio station Bayern 5 was interested in the subject and will broadcast a report on the coming Sunday, April 18, in the time between 1 and 1:30 p.m. Besides that, a Munich TV station also mentioned interest in a broadcast.
Next week PI will follow up with an exhaustive video documentary of the sensational presentation here. Next we go once again to Berlin on Friday in order to give another try at conferring the 2009 Dhimmi Prize on Claudia Roth. And then on Saturday, we will attempt to show solidarity with Geert Wilders in a demonstration before the Embassy of the Netherlands. We hope that numerous Islam critics from all over Germany will make the trip to this enormously important event. Nothing would be more counterproductive than to have only a small group of a couple dozen steadfast individuals.
The next Munich conference event will as usual follow on Friday, May 14, at 7 p.m. in the Guild House. It will deal with the question of how dangerous Islam is. Besides this, the citizen initiative Pax Europa will present a 10-point plan that will be passed on to politicians and media. There will also be much time for an exhaustive discussion for citizens.
By the way, those who might be interested in having the CD-ROM with the exhaustive presentation by Michael Mannheimer, including all the slides, can order this for 12 Euros, including shipping and handling from the following E-mail address: Mimerk98@aol.com.
(Text: byzanz / Photos: RChandler / Slides: Michael Mannheimer / Translation: Anders Denken)