Hussein Fadlallah has been classified by the West as and Islamic terrorist. However, one can’t avoid the feeling that the left-wing media together with Abbas are mourning the death of the Islamic terror organization Hezbollah’s fascist.
Rationally speaking, one could say that the utopian, unbased left-wing have lost a spiritual leader. We remember that it was the left-wing MSM that fueled the flames when patriotism, national flags or national language were mentioned as intelligent aids for integration. Today, the same papers in condescending arrogance sell neo-conservative concepts as successful multi-culti assimilation. No problem — we already know where it originated. Neo-conservative thinkers entertain themselves in keeping right with the good conscience against an overpowering armada of left-wing journalists and politicians, and having presented the better concepts of society. Please!
However, in the head of a left-wing individual, this has long since not been reason enough to put his approaches on the testing bench. He also cannot. The Left has long since worked this way: The others have created something new, and the Left has then sold it as his own brainchild, or catastrophically distorted it. Intellectual copyright? That alone shows the incompleteness of the Left’s concept of thought. Ignorance is bliss. Therefore, the Left holds tightly onto its course of appeasement for Islam, while it’s the new-conservative thinkers that (attempt to) maintain Western societies and (attempt to) liberate the people within the Islamic sphere of influence. Just as a ’68 revolution against Capital was possible only inside the confines of a capitalistic state of prosperity, so the next experiment of the Left, of giving Islamic monoculture the label of multi-culti, is again possible only within the confines of neo-conservative societal order because of the massive possibility of collapse. It totally appears as though the Left is entertained by this, that it is a bully based on a robustly new-conservative foundation.
How pathological this Left worldview is in the meantime; the purely perverse reporting of the death and burial of the terrorst Fadlallah through the editorial being carried out by the left-wing ideologues and Islamofascists of the mass media (for example, BBC: “Fadlallah was an important man,” for whom? For the victims of the the assassin from Hezbollah?) Muslim Octavia Nasr is an emblem of this idiocy and its accompanying clique. Nasr is deified by a world of do-gooders not having a working knowledge of cultures, and has been heaped upon with accolades. In this the patrons hope for a blessing from the god of egotism. The spraying of a hint of “pseudo-holy Islamic monoculture/multi-culti” serves only as an appeasement for their own psychological shortcomings coming from a lack of genuine culture. After all, one builds only on the intellectual foundation of another. However, since CNN woman Nasr wears no head scarf, this allows the (secret) left-wing propensity toward the collectivistic totalitarianism of Islam for its own egotistical self-adulation to be well hidden. At least from the masses of their own dumbed down clientele.
It is only stupid that Mrs. Nasr apparently laid down an early start as regards the public disclosure of her radical Islamic persuasion. She doesn’t worship the left-wing synchretic ego-god, rather Allah, and thereby she commits a capital crime against her multi-culti promoters
On her Twitter account octavianasrCNN, Nasr has it reported after the announcement of the death of the Islamic stringpuller for terror (see picture), that she is “sad” about the passing away of the sacred Hezbollah leader. He was “one of the giants of Hezbollah whom they respected greatly”… Put it together: “Moderate Muslim” who is fostered by the Left intelligentsia, “respected” an Islamofascist terrorist? Moderate Islam + Left = Terror?
Honoring Fadlallah is no sign of advance, independent thought or a substantial distinction. Praising Fadlallah simply shows that mainstram Islam cannot be distinguished from “Islamic terrorists” in its strategic goals either. Just as mass murder by the terrorists is indeed rejected (merely) by the cultural Muslim on tactical grounds because it could shake up the masses in the West and it incidentally affects Muslims, so also the public disclosure of individual radical Islamic beliefs held by the Muslims is for the most part held back in editorial bureaus or given in a well packaged admission (“I am against terrorism!”). It is possible this way to put the achievements of Islam in the West in danger due to carelessness in. Ayaan Hirsi Ali calls these radicals the undercover Islamofacists, like “showcase moderate” Tariq Ramadan is also one, for an example. The goal remains the same for the bulk of the Muslims: The West has to become an autocratic Sharia society. Such is demanded in Islamic writings, in Islam.
In closing, we would therefore like to delight the Left of Europe with a truism: Only because something is new, different or “foreign” doesn’t mean it is positive per se for the coheision of a society. In reference to Islam, we would suggest to you with wise foresight that you separate from your Islamic and left-wing hate preachers and terrorist admirers. Then they could in a few years sell it as “their” success and “their” world view… Paying homage to terrorists is not progressive, it is only naive, stupid or otherwise calculated intention. Something like that should have been learned from characteristic socialist history with Stalin or Che Guevarra, don’t you think?
CNN, by the way, has fired Octavia Nasr.
(Guest Contribution by die Realität)
1 comment:





























The more they twit, the more they expose themselves.