Murder of a Vietnamese Mother

4 comments:

1. #1 yujiao   (09. Sep 2010 03:47)  

   This example indicated how the culture affects the business.
   There are four cultural dimensions that were defined in Hofstede’s research: Power distance, Uncertainty avoidance, Individualism, Masculinity, and recently Hofstede add one more: long-term-short-term orientation.ed hardy bags
   What I think the most significant influence in cultural difference is the power distance. (Hoecklin,1995:28)”It would condition the extent to which employees accept that their boss has moreed hardy perfume power than they have and the extent to which they accept that their boss’s opinions and decisions are right because he or sheed hardy shoes is the boss

2. #2 DP11   (11. Sep 2010 01:12)  

   Any further news on this despicable murder?

3. #3 DP11   (11. Sep 2010 01:14)  

   I think she is a Christian.

4. #4 DP11   (12. Sep 2010 21:33)  

   Generally I’m against burning books but there are a couple of points that negate that general principle

   1. Not burning the koran will be seen as indication that Western nations have caved, are cowards and will not defend even their own religion and culture, but will bow down to the koran.

   2. Most Muslims will see that even though we may be occupying a couple of Muslim countries, on the political front, we have surrendered, and admitted that Islam is more ‘powerful’ an ideology then anything we have in the West.

   From this they will naturally assume, and they are right, that politically and ideologically, they have conquered the West. The physical conquest is then only a matter of time.

   ——————————-
   Pastor Jones on his own has brought the whole established church of Liberalism of the West, screaming for his blood.

   Isn’t it interesting that just one man, has shaken the ground of this formidable church of Liberalism, backed by the entire media and all the politicians of the West. If one pastor can do this, it shows how fragile this Liberal PC church is.

   Pastor Jones may have a small tiny church, but it is built on solid ground, on a rock. The established church of Liberalism is huge, has the backing of every western state, in fact Liberalism is the state, has the total backing of the media, but is built on sand.

   This is happening when the Moslem population in Europe is 20m or so. What will happen when it is 30, 50, or 100m? Moslems will intimidate us to an extent that we will not be able to breathe till we have a mullah’s permission, and even then will be whacked on the head, have to pay the Jizya, and feel contrite.

   The Moslem population in Europe is now so large, that immigration measures are too late. If we wish to secure a free future then there is no path left now but the last one, the one that no one really wants to take. But it is the only one available, and the only one that secures our freedom while not compromising our principles.

   The trouble with all these brave warriors of Islam is that they are screaming threats of what they intend to do to us, and think that we will treat it as a joke. For some time yes, but I hope they do not provoke us too much.

   I would have hoped by now that they have some idea of the Western way of war – not much threats, just the delivery of death and destruction on a large scale.

   When that happens, Moslems will be begging for mercy – are we not human? Do we not bleed if you cut us? But they do not realise that their supplication to the ordinary soldier or even a senior army officer will have no effect. The modern Western way of war is a bureaucratic engine that simply runs and runs, grinding the enemy to nothing.

   They do not realise that our tolerance of their shenanigans is a measure of the supreme arrogance of our Western military.

   Let us hope they do not find out the hard way.

   As our elite ruling class bends over to appease Islam and Muslims, they might feel that they are doing it to prevent war, and thus working towards peace.

   But the fact remains that when Muslims see us hanging our own, a person who is simply stating the obvious, that the koran is an obnoxious book, while the US army burns Bibles, the founding book of our civilisation, they must feel nothing but contempt for people such us – a people who betray their own civilisation and themselves.

   Imagining that I stand outside the West, I too would feel nothing but contempt for a people who have elected such a shameful bunch of politicians. I too would feel, that such a people need to be conquered.

   As Muslims view the present scene of battle, they see an enemy that is not just in disarray, but is destroying the very warriors who wish to defend the West. They see an enemy that is ready and willing to be subjugated, for their ruling class has already thrown in the towel.

   The corollary to this is that if we had supported Terry Jones, Muslims would view us with respect. Muslims respect people who are confident with their own values and to stand up to them, and view Islam with contempt.

   In a way the last is normal and the best way to deal across cultures, for then there is no misunderstanding and wars are avoided.
   Obama was so upset and angry that a pastor was threatening to burn a koran.

   And yet, the US army burnt Bibles in May 2009, i.e., when Obama was the CinC of the US armed forces.

   Burning Bibles is not something Americans, particularly ones in the armed forces are likely to do. Advice must have been sought on this issue of what to do, and gone right up the chain of command. So did Obama give consent to the burning of Bibles? If he is a Christian, as he says he is, I cant see any Christian willingly burning Bibles or giving an order to do so.

   Even if he did’nt, as he is the CinC, he must bear the responsibility.

   The Islamic problem in the UK, and Europe is now so huge that nothing short of war will ensure the continuation of Western civilisation.

   Muslims will, when they have the numbers, institute sharia. That means Goodbye West. Fortunately for us, Muslims will not be content to institute sharia in a peaceful manner – For conquest to be sanctified, it can only be after bloodshed. Only blood will legitamise the conquest.

   So war be the final arbiter, as it should be in such circumstances.
   ———-

   This is worth reading. If D’Souza is right, it indicates the scale of blunder that was committed by Americans in electing not just un-American but an anti-American as POTUS.

   D’Souza on what drives Obama

   http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/017313.html Islam center’s eerie echo of ancient terror

   Islam center’s eerie echo of ancient terror

   In theory, at least, the culture of American Muslims should be American. Of course, this being America, each ethnic community has its distinct cultural memories — the Iranians in Los Angeles are different from the Arabs in Dearborn.

   In fact, the proposed structure is known in Islamic history as a rabat — literally a connector. The first rabat appeared at the time of the Prophet.

   The Prophet imposed his rule on parts of Arabia through a series of ghazvas, or razzias (the origin of the English word “raid”). The ghazva was designed to terrorize the infidels, convince them that their civilization was doomed and force them to submit to Islamic rule. Those who participated in the ghazva were known as the ghazis, or raiders.

   After each ghazva, the Prophet ordered the creation of a rabat — or a point of contact at the heart of the infidel territory raided. The rabat consisted of an area for prayer, a section for the raiders to eat and rest and facilities to train and prepare for future razzias. Later Muslim rulers used the tactic of ghazva to conquer territory in the Persian and Byzantine empires. After each raid, they built a rabat to prepare for the next razzia.

   http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/islam_center_eerie_echo_of_ancient_iRTMW6TprkULnaA1Nqi9xM

   It is this reason why imam Rauf is so adamant that a rabat is built at GZM – there is no other place in America except at the Pentagon.