The same ones are always raising the voice of warning and not agreeing with the general howling of those who only confirm Sarrazin’s subjects: Ralf Giordano, the former BDI president Hans-Olaf Henkel, the Islam critic Necla Kelek and the Berlin representative René Stadtkewitz. The all show that they have dealt substantially with Sarrazin, are addressing problems and not whitewashing them, and agree with his themes.

The BZ reports:

Excerpts from it have already been published in “Spiegel” and “Bild.” In it he sharply criticizes the current head of the Bundesbank, and the social, education, and immigration policies. A host of integration commissioners and Islam research scientists are looking for “minimization, delusion and denial of the problem.” In addition, Sarrazin with his 464-page work enters strong judgment with Islam and Muslim immigrants. For example, he writes, “In no other religion is there such a flowing descent into violence, dictatorship and terrorism.”

Which is really true. Or is it possible for one of the so-called critics to prove the opposite?

There are many who denote Sarrazins statements as injurious and defaming, among them even Federal Chancellor Angela Merkel (CDU). Party pals are even accusing Sarrazin of advocating the thought processes of the NPD.

For there isn’t another comparison. The Central Council of Jews distinguisheds itself the minimization of NS (Nazional Socialist – Nazi) times:

The Central Council of Jews called Sarrazin’s statements indeed “extremely dangerous,” because “His racist tirades of hate that he has launced for months resemble someone going back and forth with a lighter at a gasoline station.”

It does us well that there are still voices of reason among the hysterical howls of do-gooders:

“Of course, Mr. Sarrazin is a great warner. He is one of those telling the truth,” says publicist Ralph Giordano to the BZ. His critics, however, didn’t accept these empirical truths, Giordano said and he stressed, “nobody is analyzing the failed policies of integration in this country more transparently than Mr. Sarrazin.” (…) “I believe it is a mistake to push Mr. Sarrazin into the National Socialist corner. There is nothing compare with National Socialism here. I say that as a survivor of the Holocaust.”

We see it the same way. And to push somebody like Sarrazin into this corner has the same meaning as minimizing the grimness of this time.

Ex-BDI president Hans-Olaf Henkel also defends Sarrazin. “He is certainly no racist, but indeed an individual who is addressing the outgrowth of Islam,” Henkel stressed and elucidated: “Sarrazin always distinguishes himself through the same qualities: He is painstakingly oriented to facts and gets a thrill that touches on sadism in confronting people with inconvenient truths.

Berlin CDU head Frank Henkel, who has already undertaken the task of ejecting Stadtkewitz, pleases himself meanwhile with the following statement:

“Of course we can’t downplay the present problems,” CDU regional and fraction head Frank Henkel said.

Which our “elites” do on a permanent basis.

“But whoever bases educational problems on factors of heritage and obstructions among immigrants can no longer be helped. That is most profoundly misanthropic.”

In order to refute Sarrazin’s themes, was it really necessary to quote oneself as proof of the opposite?

René Stadtkewitz, member of the House of Representatives in Berlin, writes:

Most Honored Ladies and Gentlemen,

The sale of Dr. Thilo Sarrazin’s book “Germany Is Dismantling Itself (“Deutschland schafft sich ab”) has hardly begun and already his statements are being shred apart, judged and rubber-stamped as racist, and, of course, his ejection from the party is being called for. I see this development as notable. Hardly anybody has been able in advance to read the book completely. I, myself, just received the book, although pre-ordered a good while ago, only yesterday. Because, had the denouncers of Sarrazin taken the trouble to look through the book, at least to make a cursory pass through it, then they would have come to the realization that Dr. Sarrazin looks at the demographic development as well as immigration, which includes emigration as well as immigration, in a very discriminating way, and also supports that look with facts. Moreover, he offers the reader an array of recommendations that can and should be discussed.

I don’t want to hone in on the senseless allegations and demands of politicians from all parties who have expressed their opinions about Dr. Sarrazin’s statements with typical automation, but once again, I have concluded once how seriously policy has shackled itself, and as ever before is ready to debate the issues of integration, especially those of immigrants from Islamically shaped countries. It has been recognized already by the presently responsible politicians that this clash of two completely different models of society has to lead to increasing conflicts by means ofimmigration from the Islamic arena. Even more incomprehensible is how they are now reacting to this factual description of the situation. Even though the debate is urgently needed because only such things regarding the various approaches that can only be contemplated are being, now as before, rejected and the person introducing the debate tokenized as inhuman.

We are going to have to talk about these problems. If the politicians refuse, like they have already, to orient their action to the general well-being of society, then a change in the political landscape in Germany has to come about within a short while.

The same ones are always raising the voice of warning and not agreeing with the general howling of those who only confirm Sarrazin\'s subjects: Ralf Giordano, the former BDI president Hans-Olaf Henkel, the Islam critic Necla Kelek and the Berlin representative René Stadtkewitz. The all show that they have dealt substantially with Sarrazin, are ...

PI, 20. Sep 2010 |  Print This Post |  Email This Post | post a comment    
Kategorie: Courage, Islam, PC;

 Loading ...

look up...