On the Internet platform “Dialog für Deutschland” (Dialog for Germany), the demand for an “open discussion about Islam” received the greatest approval by far (currently more than 9000 votes) within the shortest of time. That entails – as is best known – that every survey in Germany and Europe should be the will of the people. Only, ZDF is exercising the bitterest anti-democratic resistance: This demand of course – yucky yuck! – “right-wing populist,” PI announced it – bad, bad.

(By G. Mayer, Rhein-Neckar PI Group)

Esteemed ladies and gentlemen of ZDF, nice that you read PI, and nice that you consider this blog to be journalistically relevant. That gives us the courage to answer your smear article “Right-wing populists find Merkel’s Internet dialog for themselves” on the spot.

1. The highest value for the call of an “open discussion about Islam” came to be long before the corresponding article was published on our blog. You could have researched a little more thoroughly here. Of course, we are accustomed to the production of erroneous reports by you – but why so obviously?

2. The term “right-wing populist” is semantically incorrect. “Populism” is defined as a “a policy that is undertaken to gain proximity to the people, that instrumentalizes unrest, fears and current conflicts for its purposes by addressing feelings and presenting simple resolutions.” Islam critics are not politicians, they don’t rely on capturing votes, they don’t present any resolutions. They want only to preserve the European culture, and they get involved for their children’s future.

3. The fact that you throw around such words as “right-wing populism” blindly and unprofessionally shows that you don’t intend to inform truthfully but rather carry on with mainstream-like opinion and propaganda. Only: The people have come to recognize that lately. In large parts of the viewership, you have been considered for quite a while as “Current Camera” of the 21st century. Bravo!

4. You may not like it, but that is how it is: The majority of the people in Germany and even far more in France are rejecting Islam, as you yourself had to notice in your Politbarometer 9/10 (even if you did delete this from your website). For good reason.

5. Islam critics criticize Islam because women in this religion are only half the value of the men in this religion; because homosexuals are persecuted and Israel is supposed to be exterminated; because apostates pursued with violence; because education, culture and science possess no value; because the religion is over the State; because the Sharia regulates the life of people even in the most intimate areas. Nobody escapes this system, you as “journalists” absolutely not.

6. Therefore, we are criticizing a religion and a societal model – that is supposed to become your ultimate business model? Didn’t you rant against the churches with malice and spite, throw yourselves into the gap with all your force for the “liberation of women,” set the atmosphere for quotas for homosexuals and other minorities, clamor for an unrestrained sex life? We expect that now from you – and indeed against the Islamic model. From where, simply, does your cowardice toward this issue stem?

7. In a democracy, it is normal for elections to be called so that majorities can be formed. Currently, on Facebook common to form swarms. According to countless articles by your institution, you find that good, don’t you? Or do we need to look at your accusation against PI of having called for a vote as a double standard that is hostile to democracy?

Your agitation against critics of Islam as an issue is, thus, invalid and irrational. Let’s speculate a little about your true motives: Have you lost the courage for truth? Do you no longer possess the formation of your own, founded opinion any more? Have you submissively (and well-paid) turned yourself into the mouthpiece of the ruling class and their ideology?

Or: Are you afraid that your business model of “right-wing” bashing could go down the drain? For this, we’ll give you a tip: check out the Antifa! They think similarly there as you.

And in conclusion, let us quote the Italian poet Ignazio Silone (1900-1978):

“If fascism returns, it will not say: I am fascism. No, it will say: I am antifascism.”

» info@zdf.de

Translator Note: ZDF is the tax-payer funded German TV Network “Zweites Deutsches Fernsehen”

Posted by PI / Translation: Anders Denken

On the Internet platform \"Dialog für Deutschland\" (Dialog for Germany), the demand for an \"open discussion about Islam\" received the greatest approval by far (currently more than 9000 votes) within the shortest of time. That entails – as is best known – that every survey in Germany and Europe should be the will of ...

freethink, 06. Feb 2012 |  Print This Post |  Email This Post | post a comment    
Kategorie: Fight against the Right™, Freedom of speech, Germany, Leftists, Media, PC;

 Loading ...

look up...