Why does one hear so little from Mazyek and consorts here in our country, who wouldn’t hesitate for a second to begin screaming if southern Nigeria’s Muslims would be driven out?

The pattern playing out right now in Nigeria and apparently being completed with success is spreading throughout the world. Muslims “purify” their area completely from non-believers, but settle in the areas of non-believers and begin right away to play the part of the offended if the despised infidels don’t like it. This can be seen in Turkey where the non-Muslims were cleaned out, which was called population exchange but in actuality was an ejection and mass murder. In Turkey, there are almost only Muslims, but in Greece’s northwest, the Muslims have remained. There wasn’t too much of an exchange, or at least in a certain direction. Before this, the Arabian peninsula was purged of infidels, but who are allowed to come when they need somebody to get them out of hot water, which the proud sons of the wilderness are either incapable of or too cowardly to do so themselves. That always applies when the Muslim ratio is not met, which we can learn on German streets that it comes to around five to one. In the Philippines a similar thing is occurring. In southern Mindinao, Abu Sayyaf has bitten hard and are driving out or kidnapping Christians for ransom. But other Muslims are spreading themselves unhindered in every region of the Philippines against the will of the population who would rather see these Muslims immediately driven off the islands in the direction of Malaysia. But that is only being said behind a held up hand where the government stands for peace between the religions.

Peace between religions is really only possible when Islam is not involved. Islam has written down in its constitution (Quran) the non-respect toward those of other faiths, and the infidels can only have success if they orient themselves according to the Quran. Unfortunately, that hasn’t gotten through to our politicians. In this country [Germany], one desires to engage Islam with the neighborly love of Christianity while at the same time demonize Christianity — even when the party name has a “C” in it.

As for Nigeria, it remains to be said: Nobody among us cares what’s happening there. Nothing will come outside of a few half-hearted suggestions to the Nigerian Al Qaeda, regardless of how many Christians are being brutally murdered. But woe if a hundred or more Muslims would be driven out of the south, then we will see how much we owe to the people of Africa because of neighborly love. The leftists will scream indignantly; Roth will look involved and shock us with another dance – we don’t deserve anything else – and organize a candle chain that has washed itself. And the party with the “C”? Does it really still exist?

Posted by PI / Translation: Anders Denken

Posted by kewil on PI / Translation: Anders Denken

Posted by PI / Translation: Anders Denken

Images of the situation in the Ivory Coast (Warning: Disturbing scenes in the second half of the video):

You can find further information regarding current events here.

(Hat Tip: LinksLiegenLassen)

Whoever is unable to cease from shaking hands and conversation or a walk together runs the risk of arrest, flogging and the death penalty.

Die Welt reports:

“That is a horrible regulation,” Hussein Ali from the city of Jowhar said. “I feel as if I am under arrest. I have begun to ignore the greetings of female acquaintances in order to avoid punishment.”

The al-Shabaab edict is being carried out in the city of Elasha as well. Female student Hamdi Osman said that armed individuals searched busses for women travelling alone or that weren’t appropriately dressed. They were beaten because they wore a traditional Somali dress instead of the long, black and shapeless robe that is preferred by the militia.

The new Islamic laws apply to women especially: they are no longer permitted to wear normal clothes, only black, shapeless sack-like robes. Also, what’s under has to be Islamically correct: bras are prohibited. Women are no longer allowed to work outside of their homes and risk their lives if they don’t want their children to starve. And just as prohibited are movies and music. Favorite measures for the punishment of (female) criminals are “public amputations, floggings and stonings.”

Note: The subject of “Sharia and Women” is “surprisingly” not an issue to be found on the German Amnesty homepage, nor on “Urgent Actions” nor on the “Somalia National Report”. As usually, this one pretty much got past Amnesty…

» info@amnesty.de

Part 2: What Dan Roodt is Struggling for

Part 3: Current Apartheid against Whites in SA

Part 4: About Eugène Terre’Blanche

Part 5: Who populated first South Africa?

Part 6: South Africa better & safer under Apartheid?

Part 7: ANC deadly regime favored by Globalists?

Part 8: About World Soccer Cup in South Africa

Part 9: Corrupted Police and justice in South Africa

Part 10: Orania experiment, an example to follow?

Part 11: A forthcoming Afrikaner State?

Part 12: ANC leaders to be prosecuted in The Hague?

Part 13: Europe’s responsibility towards Afrikaners

(By the Living Scoop)

SpOn gloatingly reports:

Israel is considered a nuclear power, even though its government has neither confirmed nor denied the existence of the weapens. The policy of duplicity offers a great advantage: Israel has nuclear deterrent potential at its disposal, without having to submit to the international monitoring authorities…

However, documents have now surfaced that could expose Israel in two ways, should they be authentic: They would be the first documented proof for the existence of Israeli nuclear weapons. Also, they would give the impression that Israel is responsible for dealing with the bomb, ad absurdum. That wouldn’t make it too easy for the government in Jerusalem to condemn the Iranian nuclear program in the currently on-going talks about weapons disarmament in New York. …

According to this, the former South African Defense Minister Pieter Willem Botha has asked his Israeli colleague Shimon Peres for “Jericho” missiles and the necessary warheads. Peres, Israel’s current president, offered them “in three sizes,” according to the documents – which were to mean conventional, chemical and nuclear warheads. In one letter from the year 1975, the Peres’ signature can be seen. He is recognized as the father of the Israeli nuclear program.

It has been considered a foregone conclusion for years that Israel and South Africa have cooperated in the area of nuclear research. …

Moreover, other sources have reported of Israel’s aid to the racist Apartheid regime – for instance, in the building of the Pelindaba research reactor, the construction of carrier systems after the model of the “Jericho” missiles, and the development of nuclear warheads. That Israel had been willing to pass on complete warheads including carrier systems to South Africa would however be a new class of information.

The historian Polakow-Suransky told the “Guardian” that the Israeli government had attempted to stop the release of the documents by the South African authorities. “It appeared not to matter to the South Africans,” Polakow-Suransky said. “It is not especially important to the ANC government to protect the dirty laundry of the old associates of the Apartheid regime.”

In other words, the heroes of the ANC have now brought the second Apartheid state down as well. If the former South African President Frederick Willem De Klerk (photo with Nelson Mandela at the awarding of the Nobel Peace Prize) had not been there to tell his side, the whole story would have amounted to nonsense. He thinks:

“I have no reason to question the information that was consistently conveyed to me by the relevant authorities that South Africa developed nuclear weapons on its own.”

This statement is covered by that of the accused Shimon Peres, who already declared on Monday, that the story is void of any foundation in reality. He has never made a nuclear weapon agreement with South Africa. The alleged accords have never existed. Also, the report of the Guardian is based on absolutely no facts, rather solely on the selective (anti-Israeli) interpretation of South African documents.

The speaker of the Israeli Foreign Ministry Yigal Palmor also adds:

“When headlines claim to reveal a hidden fact, and the documents presented as evidence indicate nothing of the sort, one has no choice but to call it as it is: biased babble.”

“This is nothing more than another shot by the “Guardian” at was has been the top item on their agenda in recent years; linking Israel to apartheid at all costs, including at the cost of proof and fact.”

Again, the propaganda of hostility against Israel has revived the fable of the “Jews”, and again there will be more faith placed in the lies than in the truth – as is clearly visible by SpOn‘s example.

(Translation: Anders Denken)

The girl had been forced to marry.

The Süddeutsche (newspaper) disinforms the reader:

A 13-year-old has died in Yemen from a vaginal hemorrhage, according to reports from human rights advocates – four days after her marriage to a man around 30 years old.

According to statements by the non-governmental organization El Shakaek, the evaluation of a coroner showed that the child had bled to death after an injury to the hymen. The girl had already died on April 2.

(…)
The little girl’s marriage was proclaimed widely throughout the bitterly poor country on the southwest portion of the Arabian peninsula.
(…)
In this country of strong tribal structures, a legal draft is currently being debated that would set the minimum age at 17 years for the marriage of young girls. Women’s rights advocates support the draft, conservatives and Islamists reject it.

Aha! Poverty is to blame. And tribal cultures! And – oh yes – a couple of (evil) Islamists. It was certainly not the “example” of the paedophilic “prophet.” Child marriage is Islamic!

(Contributor: Andreas / Translation: Anders Denken)

TT com. reports:

A few years ago an eight-year-old girl caused great furor by bravely marching into court and demanding a divorce from her husband, a man in his 30s.

The attempts at getting a ban on child marriage in Yemen has suffered a harsh setback lately; a few of the most influential Islamic scholars have declared endorsers of the ban as apostates. With this religious decree, a law that forbids girls under the age of 17 from getting married is hanging in the balance.

The marrying of girls still in childhood is common custom in Yemen. Abolishing it will not be easy because of the bitter poverty in the country. It is only difficult for poor families to forego a bridal price worth 100 Euros (about 140 US dollars at this time).

An important thing to consider. Bitter poverty is to blame. And custom. And right. But there was something else:

Following a report from the Social Ministry, over a quarter of Yemenis marry before their 15th birthday. Also, tribal customs play a role in this, as well the view that a young bride can be cultivated into an amenable wife that brings more children into the world, and no attempt is excluded for doing this.

In February of the previous year, the minimum age for matrimony was legally set at 17 years. However, the law was criticized by a few politicians as “un-Islamic,” attacked and handed back to the Parliament’s constitutional committee for further examination. A decision by the panel is expected in the coming month. Also part of this committee are a few of the clergy that signed the decree on Saturday.

(…)

The clergy organized a protest demonstration of women against the law on Sunday. Completely veiled from head to toe, they carried posters with the slogan: “Yes to the Islamic Rights of the Women.”

“I was married at 15, and today I have many children,” declares demonstrator Umm Abdul Rahman. “And I will marry of my daugther at the same age, if I conclude that she’s ready for it.”

And no left-wing or Green human rights person is interested in the right of children to self-determination. Human rights play absolutely no role when Islam comes into play.

Of course, this whole thing has nothing to do with paedophilia — and even less with Islam. And whoever says otherwise is lying. We know about this from Susanne Winter.

(Contributor: ComebAck / Translator: Anders Denken)

BILD reports:

She will never forget the moment her husband called, “Ines is in Tunisia; you won’t ever see her again!” Danuta K. (35) from Nürnberg worried for three months about her daughter. Her husband Mohammed K. (29) had kidnapped the 2-year-old and taken her to his homeland.

The Drama: In November 2009, the chemical laboratory technician separated from her husband. Shortly thereafter, he asked if he could take their daughter to the Tunisian capital, Tunis, for a few days. Danuta K. said, “I didn’t think anything of it.”

A week later, Mohammed returned to Germany — without their daughter. The girl had remained with the husband’s family. The mother said, “Never before in my life have I suffered so much. I filed a complaint right away.” Mohammed was arrested, but there was no trace of the daughter.

The despairing mother became acquainted with a Tunisian on the Internet — he offered her help. Together they crafted a clever plan: The mother flew to North Africa with gifts for Mohammed’s family — “perfume, clothes, money. All in all, 1,700 Euros worth.” The gifts placated the family. Danuta could take a walk with her daughter.

THE CHANCE FOR FLIGHT!

The mother and daughter drove with the Tunisian helper to Monastir. There, acquaintances smuggled the child through the passport check. For without the agreement of the father, Ines would never be allowed to leave Tunisia again!

Ines landed in Nürnberg in good shape. The mother said, “I can’t say at all, just how lucky I was at the time.”

(Contributor: Günther / Translation: Anders Denken)

The subsequently leveled the village to the ground.

(Translation of German PI article by Anders Denken)

(By the Editrix)

“All the blood, the cries, my own helplessness – all those impressions are deeply ingrained in my brain. I will never forget them.” Abdi Warsameh hopes to inform about what is going on in his country — a truly courageous thing to do. Will people be interested? I doubt it. Basically, this is not new.

Notabene that in the comment section of the Blick article America is compared to, or rather equated with, Somalia. Clearly, Europeans deserve what they are getting.

At the World Press Photo website all four pictures can be viewed in high resolution, which I recommend specifically for those who think that “some Sharia” in the West wouldn’t be all bad.

Die Presse, who mentioned the incident after all, relativizes about this situation that has even worsened, and says that the riots have occurred even against Muslims, suggesting with the title “27 Dead: Burning Mosques and Churches in Nigeria” that the violence was actually perpetrated by Christians against Muslims.

In bloody riots between Muslims and Christians in the Nigerian city of Los, there are at least 27 people killed and more than 300 injured according to official reports. The catalyst for the unrest was an arson attack by Muslim youth against a church filled with believers. As a result of the arson attack, 22 people lost their lives according to the statement of one of the speakers for the local Imam. Five more succumbed to injuries on Monday.

But that’s not the interesting thing. More interesting to the Western media is that there were counteractions against the Muslims, and this is supposed to prove that the Christians themselves are no better than the Muslims.

Even Mosques and apartment houses went up in flames as a result of the unrest. The police presumably arrested 35 participants.

That the apartment houses apparently belonged to Christians, and not really to Muslims, we can once again gather from the report from Open Doors. Jihad Watch mentions ten Christian churches that have been set on fire also. Reuters, mentions 13. The fairy tale about burning Mosques apparently comes from the BBC who keeps us in the dark as to the details.

(Translation of German PI-article by Anders Denken)

When will the world finally wake up? The Grüne Pest brings up the unpleasant truth: