(By Michael Stürzenberger)

Author Hans Rühle reports:

In all the schoolbooks, it is established that the islamic revolution of 1979 created an especially historical phenomenon: the first islamic government in 1400 years – an islamic theocracy. It is in their natural course of things to please Allah in everything, to lead the people to the real joy of the afterlife, and to spread Islam in the world. Since the islamic revolution was not just a victory over oppression by the Shah regime but also valued as the pinnacle of the battle against its foreign supporters, it has had an international dimension from the very beginning.

Iran has the religious duty of globalizing the islamic revolution and turning the local victory into a universal one. In one schoolbook for the 7th grade, it says regarding this subject: “In order now to advance the islamic revolution, it is our duty, with application of our full strength, to lead the uprising against the arrogant ones (meaning the United States) and the oppressors before all of Islam’s commands and the dissemination of the saving message ‘There is no god but Allah’ has reached the whole world.”

This message is being sent to all Muslims in the world:

Since the oppressors will not rest until they “have driven you from your Muslim identity,” all Muslims should decide to “smash the teeth of the American mouth” (Textbook 11th Grade). In this context, Khomeini’s call to the “Muslims of all the world’s lands” is quoted:

“Since a slow death was imposed on you under the government of the foreigners, you shall overcome the fear of death, and deploy the passionate and martyrdom-seeking youth who are willing to break open the borders of the infidels. Do not think at all about allowing the status quo to continue. Think much more of fleeing the prison, of escaping slavery, and attacking the enemies of Islam. Glory and life lie in the battle, and the first step of the battle lies in the persistence of the will. Afterward comes the decision to impose the ban upon yourselves so that you bring the supremacy of the world of unbelief and of polytheism under subjection, especially America.”

This war for the victory of Islam in the whole world shall be waged as a form of jihad. This victory, however, is not guaranteed. It is Allah’s decision to give Muslims the victory or to make martyrdom possible. In both cases you are the true victor in your convictions.

In Khomeini’s much quoted words: “I declare with absolutely no ambiguity to the world: If the devourers of the world (the USA and their allies) want to oppose our religion, we will stand against the whole world and will not yield until they have all been wiped out. Either we will all be liberated, or we will all enter the greater freedom – martyrdom. … Either we will joyfully shake hands over the victory of Islam in the world, or we will choose eternal life and martyrdom. In both cases victory and success belong to us.”

This view of things becomes understandable when envisioning the unalterable goals of Islam in this whole war: “total victory over the world of disbelief and the arrogance, the eradication of every oppression, the appearance of the Master of Time (the hidden imam), and the institution of Islam’s world government.”

This is a declaration of war on all of the non-Muslim world. And the worst: Allah’s warriors have no fear of death in this global confrontation, since they are promised islamic paradise with the fulfillment of every wish for death in battle – including 72 willing virgins:

The inclusion of the Shiite messianic way of thought of the return of the hidden imam into the list of battle objectives converts the confrontation into a form of Shiite Armageddon between the forces of good and evil. The Muslim who is killed in this fight is a martyr who is glorified in the Quran and to whom paradise has been promised. Much more significant, however, is the fact that, along with the quoted statements by Khomeini, the collective martyrdom of the Iranian people is portrayed as also possible and practical – as “victory.”

Young Iranians are being drilled in the schools to become hate-filled war machines:

In order to survive in this total war, an unbridled hate against the potential opponent is necessary. “The hearts of the pupils shall be filled with hate against the ‘arrogant ones,’” it says also in a teacher’s manual. In a language drill, the pupils are supposed to write the meaning of certain words, among others, the word “America.” The answer from the teacher’s manual reads: “America – the great Satan.”

Even though the Jews are traditionally not considered enemies (?? note the remark by PI below), they aren’t mentioned positively in any schoolbook. Much more of an account is given for Muhammad’s time about the “confrontation with the Jews’ conspiracy,” of “hostility and betrayal of the Jews,” this “greedy group of people.” The real object of hate, though, is the State of Israel. This forms “a basis for America and other aggressive powers” that have the goal of conquering Muslim territory. Israel occupies Jerusalem and the holy place of Islam, the al-Aqsa mosque, and oppresses and kills Palestinians, even children, living under their occupation.

First with the remark: In the Quran, Jews are called “apes and pigs,” they are considered inferior; Muhammad had 800 imprisoned Jews beheaded; in the Hadiths are found several commands by Muhammad to kill Jews, which are also quoted in the Hamas charter – how can they come to say that Jews weren’t “traditionally” considered to be enemies, Mr. Rühle?

Next point: Islam really cannot make any claim to power on Jerusalem, since Muhammad was never there. Also his nocturnal, ominous “flight by horse” to his Burak cannot have gone to Jerusalem, since at that time there was no mosque there. According to the Quran, this flight is known to have gone to a “far away mosque.” Therefore, the Dome of the rock out to be torn down and rebuilt somewhere on the Arabian peninsula. The al-Aqsa mosque ought to be reconverted into the Christian St. Maria Basilica because that’s what it was before it was conquered and made into a mosque eight years after Muhammad’s “fight by horse,” and six years after his death.

Islam is gravely dangerous. It gives the feeling of power and a collective identity as well in which one can feel like a better person. And the legitimization imparts the power to subjugate people of other faiths by expressly allowing violence – culminating in the license to kill.

When will the world wake up?

(Hat Tip: Islam-Nein-Danke, bernte, Hildesheimer, sincimilia, chessie)

Posted by byzanz on PI / Translation: Anders Denken

(By Raymond de Toulouse)

Here is the chronology:

The Shafia family, which came from Kabul, leaves Afghanistan in 1992 and lives in Pakistan, Dubai and Australia before moving to Canada in 2007. Here they receive immigration status. A few months later Mohammad Shafia’s first wife follows, her name, Rona Amir. She arrives in Canada in November 2007. A few months afterward, Rona Amir begins to keep a journal in which she speaks of abuses, threats and insults by Mohammed and Yahya.

One year later, April 2009, she flees with the oldest Shafia daughter, Zainab, 19, to a shelter. She would like to take her own life in hand and marry her boyfriend. The Shafia daughters left behind, Geeti and Sahar prompty call the police emergency number and tell about great fear of the father’s reaction over the running away of the oldest daughter. Two weeks later, while the father is on a trip to Dubai, Zainab gives in to the mother’s pressure and returns home. In addition, the mother promises that Zainab may marry her boyfriend. On May 18th, Zainab marries her boyfriend, but the family persuades her to have the marriage annulled a few hours later.

On June 20, 2009, the Shafias’ family computer is used for the Internet search on “how best to commit a murder.” On June 22nd, the three Shafia murderers begin with the concrete planning and carrying out of the murder of their three daughters and Mohammed’s first wife. And in later wiretapped telephone calls by the authorities, the murderers give the reason for their plan: The three daughters and the first wife had become too Western and had tarnished the honor of the family in doing this.

The Crime: The three murderers pretend to plan a vacation trip to Niagara Falls for the ten-member family. For this the need to get a second car. It is a Nissan SUV, which was later found at the bottom of a canal with the four drowned victims inside. On the return trip, a short touring stay in Toronto is planned in order to delay the return trip to Montréal and to find another reason to stay overnight. Then here, in Kingston, is where it happens: Father and son drown the three daughters and the first wife until unconscious or dead, then they put them in the Nissan, which they drove beforehand to the docks. The vehicle is shoved by hand into the canal. The four victims are hidden the next morning, floating around inside the Nissan.

Nevertheless, this sentence differs considerably from the pseudo-judicial German discussion group (“Schmoozing judiciary with an immigrant bonus to assess of the number of hours in social service”). But ultimately, when considering the fact it must be sustained that the people who hamper integration (and in the Shafia case, there were many hints before the murders) actively violate the Constitution. A claim for asylum or a residency permit in such cases should cease immediately, citizenship should be revoked, and legal steps should ensue.

(Sources: citytv.com and ctv.ca)

Guest Contribution posted on PI / Translation: Anders Denken

We find that it took a jury 15 hours to determine the guilt of Mohammad Shafia, his (second?) wife Tooba Yahya, and their son Hamed on four counts of first-degree murder. In Canada, first-degree murder fetches a sentence of life with a chance of parole at 25 years.

Who were the victims? and why?

The answer to the first question: Zainab, Sahar, Geeti, and Rona Amir Mohammad. All women.

The answer to the second question is a little more difficult to make out when looking at mainstream media (MSM) outlets. Readers on the North American continent need to get these three little letters – MSM – fixed in their mind, for the MSM will report what’s happening, but they tend to be selective in which parties they disclose that might be involved in the situation.

Looking at the articles, like in HuffPo, for example, we find that the three sisters, all in their teens, were murdered for defying their family’s rules of discipline regarding dress, whom they might date, with whom they might socialize, and what they would access on the Internet. HuffPo fails to tell us where these disciplinary rules come from.

In the HuffPo Article, however, was no mention of why the (first?) wife was murdered. Could it be that she was childless? This wasn’t in the HuffPo article, but it was in the New York Daily News. Apparently Mr. Shafia married his second wife because his first couldn’t bear children, but he kept both wives. Or, maybe she supported the Western lifestyle that is so despised by the unmentioned, so-called religion, as the prosecutors believed. NY Daily News doesn’t tell us why this Western lifestyle is so hated, either.

HuffPo doesn’t mention Islam at all in connection with these murders. We find the word Islam mentioned only when scrolling down to the comments, which themselves are pretty dicey, and surprisingly still there. They only talk about “family discipline rules.” HuffPo does give a little history of what led up to the murders, though, without stating the driving force behind the rage. So, were these arbitrary rules that this father fashioned just for his family. How is it that there are so many families that adhere to a certain unmentionable religion that have the self-same rules?

NY Daily News does give a little more through the information obtained by wiretap.

CNN took the feminist approach in the last paragraph of the article by attributing it to male sexuality and power and control over the woman’s body.

Interestingly, when scanning the CNN article, other devices of taqiyya (‘deception’ for those who haven’t read through other PI articles yet) can be found in the article. For example, Shafia swore on the Quran and said it doesn’t “condone killing people” to preserve the honor of the family. However, in Islam, many times the Quranic passages are supported by the Hadiths (for those who aren’t familiar with these writings, they are commentaries made by Islamic scholars throughout the centuries after Muhammad’s death), which are also considered dogma by Muslims. A good article to read for a quick introduction can be found at islam-watch.org. Also on the right sidebar of this PI page are good downloadable PDF articles that can give you more information regarding this strange ideology accused of being a religion.

By the way, in the quick scan of MSM (remember MainStream Media) articles, I didn’t find the word ‘Islam’ in any of the articles. They reported the court proceedings, some with more detail, some with less. The truth can be told, but it can also be twisted until there is no way to understand what it really is. Obviously, the western Western media have learned well from their European colleagues.

In Europe, they’ve already been told that such violence has nothing to do with Islam, or Islam is peace. But what has been said in the MSM, and what the complete reality of the matter is can be two totally different things.

Also, did anyone hear that the trial had to be delayed because of a bomb threat? Thanks to Pamela Geller, we are able to obtain this information. Something that wasn’t readily reported about in the M–S–M!

The verdict in the trial? Guilty of four counts of murder. The verdict for the MSM? Guilty of suppressing an important part of the truth.

Previous article about this subject:

» Honor Killings – In Canada?

Posted by Anders Denken

Here are links regarding the case:

- Daily Mail
- Asian Image
- Euro Weekly

Really, what good are all the cumbersome ground controls when islamists sit in the cockpit? And you’re not at all allowed to consider all the transportation workers and sanitation forces on the ground. Also, in Heathrow, hundreds of illegals are already employed at the airport! They haven’t had the first passport! With unidentified religion in any case!

Posted by kewil on PI / Translation: Anders Denken

The “Westfälische Nachrichten” :

Rheine (dpa/lnw) – The trial of a young man from the Münsterland, who allegedly boxed his girlfriend’s baby to death in the womb, will likely come before the court again. The defense has filed an appeal against the sentence, a judicial speaker said upon inquiry by the dpa news agency.

In the previous week, the Rheine regional court sentenced the German-Afghan to two years and nine months juvenile detention. According to the judgment, the 21-year-old intentionally dealt his girlfriend heavy fist blows to the belly during a quarrel last March.

At that time, the 19-year-old girl was in her seventh month. The baby died two days after an emergency Caesarean section. Ther had been arguing before the attack because the woman had allowed herself to be examined by a male gynecologist for the first time. If the appeal stands, the case will come bfore the Münster regional court. The accusation states illegal abortion.

Strictly speaking, the accusation reads accusation of pregnancy termination of an especially serious nature according to § 218 StGB. But to write something lik this wouldn’t have been politically correct. In the feminist view, any pregnant woman has the right to “terminate” the life of her unborn child

PI articles about the subject:

» Baby Boxer Gets 2 Years and 9 Months
» Unborn Child Punched to Death: Trial Starts Tomorrow
» Muslim verprügelt schwangere Ehefrau in Rheine

Posted by PI / Translation: Anders Denken

(By Michael Stürzenberger)

Various Swiss newspapers are reporting about the end of the ecclesiastical “investigation.” 20-Minuten Online, for example, adorned the story with the headline “Pastor To Keep Distance From Agitation Blog.” The synodal council, after ongoing investigations gave the decree: Hands away from PI. Even though her articles there most obviously produced nothing that could be objectionable:

The investigation resulted in no proof of islamophobic statements or writings by the pastor from Siselen-Finsterhennen, the synodal council recorded. No “hate sermons” were recognized, and the agitant expressions for which she was charged did not come from her.

But yet, she is supposed to stay away from PI, since “degrading and agitating articles” can be read there. At the end of the Inquisition, she bravely promised the following according to 20-Minuten Online (whether she had already been put on the rack wasn’t mentioned):

She stood positively in favor of dialog with an enlightened Islam.

The fable of the legendary “enlightened” Islam – also readily called “Euro-”islam – exists only as long as Muslims are in the minority. Anyone who has even a beginning in dealing with this ideology knows that. When positions of power are finally achieved, then the complete program of the Quran is employed. Anything else would mean blasphemy and apostasy. It is a tragedy that such a knowledgeable, well-read and likeable critic of Islam could be rendered invalid. That’s life in 2012.

“Whose bread I eat, his song I sing,” is how things are. What is left to do when someone is threatened with their existence? As for Islam, we have already long lived under lack of any democratic conditions. These unbearable measures of censorship and reeducation are all precursors of coming religious dictatorship, the full force of which our children and grandchildren will suffer.

The fact that 20-Minuten Online likes at times to fashion its own truths together can be recognized even from the article’s photo series where several factual errors can be seen right away. Fine that Christian Jung and Marco Pino are no longer with the FREEDOM party, but more than likely it still hasn’t been talked about much around Switzerland. But the fact that I was kicked out of the CSU for “islamophobia,” is something new to me. I always thought I had declared my departure in writing on May 25, 2011, so that I could candidate on June 4th for a post on the Bavarian regional FREEDOM committee. But perhaps somebody in the 20-Minuten Online editorial office knew better. And without asking at the branch office of the Munich CSU, as journalists who are interested in objective reporting should actually do.

Der Bund in Bern also reports about the subject: “Seeland Pastor Keeps Hand Away From Agitation Blog“:

The synodal council concludes in their investigation that the controversial Seeland pastor has improved her ways.

“Improved.” Isn’t that nicely formulated. The main thing is that the pastor no longer write anything negative about Islam. Hardly worth talking about is the fact that annually 160,000 Christians are murdered in islamic countries, and around 100 million are being persecuted or discriminated against. It is much more important that a pastor “improve” her ways.

If every critic of Islam had such rigid employers as Christine Dietrich, then we could just hand over the keys to the local imams in a couple of decades. And the Swiss church rulers would be able to turn their churches into mosques and their towers into minarets. My compassion in such a case would be held in serious check because the butchers themselves are paying courtship to only the stupidest of calves.

Posted by byzanz on PI / Translation: Anders Denken

(By PI Munich)

The Turkish author Zafer Senocak, who has dealt in extensively with Islam, summed it up in a clear and unmistakable way in his detailed article “Terror comes from the heart of Islam” at Welt Online:

“Even when most Muslims don’t want to admit it, terror comes from the heart of Islam; it comes right out of the Quran. It is oriented against everyone who doesn’t live and behave according to the rules of the Quran, thus against democrats, Western-inspired thinkers and scholars, against agnostics and atheists. It is especially oriented against women. It is the handiwork of a male-centric Islam, one that would exert all power possible to prevent women from being equal and finding an end to their centuries-long subjugation.”

The ageless relevance of the Quran, the immense consequences of its contents and its disastrous implication for us “infidels” can’t be the subject of discussion often enough. PI Munich, therefore, has prepared an analysis about this titled “The Quran – The World’s Most Dangerous Book. Here are a few excerpts from it:

This book is grossly underestimated in the Western world. But it is not just any book: it is the Holy Book of all Muslims. For them, every word in it comes directly from the god Allah:

“The sending down of this book is doubtlessly from the lord of the worlds” (32:2)

The Quran is full of guidelines and commands. They are clearly formulated and, according to Islamic opinion, ageless as well as unalterable:

“This is with all certainty the book of Allah, that gives no reason for doubt; it is a proper guide for the devout.” (2:2)

This religion has easy to understand, simple principles: Muhammad is the last of the prophets, for Muslims the “perfect person” and their “perfect example.” He received every instruction from Allah through the angel Gabriel. Islam means submission, and thus all believers must submit themselves to Allah’s will. Any form of criticism or contradiction is uncompromisingly prohibited:

“This happens because they resist Allah and his emissary; and those who resist Allah – truly Allah is strict in punishment.” (59:4)

Muslims must recognize the teachings which Muhammad used to influence his compatriots in the Arab bedouin society as universally applicable. His god Allah intends that belief in him be enforced against all other religions. And in a militant way, to be sure:

“It is He who sent his emissary with leading and the true religion so that He will cause it to be the victor over every other religion. And Allah is witness enough.” (48:28)

Therefore, a battle follows, willed by God against Christians, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists and others, that has already caused 270 million deaths, according to estimates by the Shoebat Institute. This god Allah, in all seriousness, wants the battle to the ultimate victory against his own creatures:

“Allah has commanded it: Of a certainty, I will win, I and my emissary. Truly, Allah is strong and mighty.” (58:21)

Islam is also supposed to seize international authority, which makes a separation of state and religion impossible:

“To Allah belongs the lordship over heaven and earth. Allah has the authority over all.” (3:189)

This god leaves no question about his plans. Non-believers don’t need to have illusions about supposed tolerance or peacefulness:

“Allah will prove the devout and exterminate the infidels” (3:141)

Any person that doesn’t accept this idea of a threatening and battle-thirsty god is bullied:

“This is nothing other than an admonishment and a clear Qur’an in which he warns everyone alive and fulfills the word against the infidels.” (36:69)

It has been handed down through islamic history that Muhammad had many of his critics killed. This killing is not only allowed in the Quran, rather it is explicitly instructed. The word “kill (or ‘slay’)” appears 189 times in the Quran, 27 times in the imperative:

“And kill them wherever you happen upon them, and drive them out from the place where they have driven you out; for the deception of the infidels is worse than killing. However, do not fight them at the holy mosque unless they fight against you there. Attack them, however, and slay them dead. Such is the reward of the infidels.” (2:191)

Have you not wondered about the notorious assurances by Muslim representatives since 9/11 that Islam is a “peaceful religion” and that violence has “nothing to do with Islam”? Mohammed Atta and his co-believers acted, for example, according to the following verse in their airplane attacks in the US among others:

“Allah has redeemed the life and goods from the devout for Paradise: They battle for Allah’s cause; they kill and are killed” (9:11)

Such unmistakable instructions are learned in 40,000 Quran schools worldwide. In Germany, around one hundred thousand young Muslims are indoctrinated each year with such verses. It is to be feared that the breeding ground has been cultivated for future terrorist generations.

“And when the holy months are over, then kill the idol worshippers wherever you find them, and attack them and besiege them and lure them out with any trap. However, if they repent and carry out the prayer and pay the Zakah, then make the way free for them. Truly, Allah is all forgiving, merciful” (9:5)

These clear calls for killing apply for all time, and especially when Jihad is declared. Osama bin Laden, Al Qaeda, Taliban, Hamas, Hezbollah and other fanatical theocratic warriors are obedient pupils of their master Muhammad:

“When you meet the infidels, then off with the head, until you have wreaked a massacre among them; then tie the bonds. After this, do not demand grace or ransom until the war takes its burden from you. It is that way. And if Allah had willed, he could have done the extermination himself, but he wanted to test one of you through the others. And those who have fallen in the way of Allah – he will never nullify it.” (47:4)

Therefore, battling and Islam quite plainly belong inextricably together:

“It is commanded of you to fight, even if it is repulsive to you. However, it may be that the thing repulsive to you is that which is good for you; and it may be that the thing you like is bad for you. And Allah knows, but you do not know.” (2:216)

When infidels stand up against the warlike islamic expansion or criticize its ideology, monstrous punishment is thought out for them:

The reward of the one who feuds with Allah and his emissary and carries out corruption on the earth is that they will be killed or crucified, or that their hands and feet will be cut off in turns, or that they will be driven out of the country. It will be a disgrace for them in this world and in the afterlife a serious punishment will be meted out to them. (5:33)

Every warrior of god is instilled with the idea that in all his work he is constantly being monitored by his strict lord in heaven:

“And fight in Allah’s way and know that Allah hears all and is omniscient.” (2:244)

But not only is battle a duty in Islam, the goading of other believers into holy war is as well:

“Therefore battle for Allah’s sake – you will be held responsible for nobody but yourself – and encourage the believers to battle. Perhaps Allah will hold back the power of those who are unbelieving; and Allah’s power is much greater, and he is stricter in punishment.” (4:84)

This battle is also richly rewarded in which Muhammad plays down the meaning of terrestrial life, but emphasizes that of the afterlife:

“Therefore, let those fight for Allah’s sake, who sell the earthly life for the prize of the hereafter. And to the one who fights for Allah’s sake, whether he is killed or wins, we will give a great reward.” (4:74)

According to official islamic sources, Muhammad was involved in 89 military actions in the space of ten years. Thus, since its beginnings, Islam has been an ideology of perpetual battle to the end that there will be only Muslims in the world:

“And battle against them so that no more seduction can take place, and fight until all honor is given to Allah alone. Separate yourself, however, from the infidel, for truly, Allah sees very well what you do.” (8:39)

In the face of these perpetual war campaigns, Muhammad had to motivate his followers effectively. This was accomplished with the help of Allah:

“Oh prophet, stir the fires of battle within the believers. If there are only twenty among you that have patience, they shall overcome two hundred; and if there one hundred among you, they will overcome one thousand who do not believe, because they are a people who do not understand.” (8:65)

There is much of battle and killing in the Quran; talk of love, in contrast, appears only seldom – except for with brave warriors:

“Truly, Allah loves those who fight for his cause, arrayed in an order of battle as though they were entrenched stonework.” (61:4)

Scruples or a bad conscience in killing is removed from the Muslims – for it is really Allah himself killing through the hands of the devout:

“You did not kill them, rather Allah has killed them. And you have not thrown as you have thrown, but Allah threw, and through that he causes the devout to undergo a beautiful test from him. Surely, Allah is all hearing and all knowing.” (8:17)

The most dangerous thing about the islamic ideology of violence is the absence of the fear of death. For the god of the Muslims rewards all who die in battle:

“And truly, if you are slain or die in the way of Allah, truly, Allah’s forgiveness and mercy is better than that which you scrape together. And if you die or are slain, you will be gathered together before Allah.” (3:157)

Muhammad recognized that the fighting power of his companions was considerably greater with a contempt for death than with a fear of death:

“And do not consider those as dead who have fallen in Allah’s way. No! They live with their lord, and there they are cared for.” (3:169)

Fallen warriors also receive a remission of sins with Allah and are taken directly to Paradise. This separates them from all other Muslims who do not know for sure whether they will enter Paradise.

“And those who migrated away and were driven out of their houses and suffered in my way and fought and fell – truly, I will wipe away all their misdeeds, and truly, I will lead them into gardens where the brooks hasten by, as a reward from Allah. And with Allah is the best reward.” (3:195)

Muslims are instructed in the Quran to wage battle without compromise as soon as they find themselves in a promising position.

“Truly those who are infidels and turn away from Allah’s way, and then die as infidels – Allah will in no wise pardon them. Therefore, do not diminish the battle and do not call for a cease-fire where you have the upper hand. And Allah is with you, and he will not diminish your deeds.” (47:34)

This warlike prophet sees himself as the inexorable pioneer employed by his god Allah in the slaughter of the “infidels”:

“It doesn’t befit a prophet to make prisoners until he slaughters on earth. You desire this world’s goods, but Allah desires the afterlife for you. And Allah is mighty and wise.” (8:67)

All “infidels” are dedicated to destruction according to the Quran:

“But those who are unbelieving – down with them! He causes their works to fail. It is this way because they hate him whom Allah has sent; therefore he brings their works to nought.” (47:8)

Muhammad demands uncompromised battle with a contempt for death from his followers, and for this he promises them Paradise in the afterlife:

“However, the Sent One and the devout ones with him who fight with their goods and their blood are the ones on whom good will be bestowed; and they are the ones who will have success. Allah has prepared gardens for them through which brooks flow; there they are to spend eternity. That is the greatest bliss.” (9:88)

Allah cares for his warriors after the death of battle:

“And for those who migrate away for Allah’s will and then are slain or die, Allah will prepare a splendid provision. Truly, Allah – he is the best provider.” (22:58)

But in Paradise, not only worldly goods await the devout. Muhammad knew how to entice his warriors with sexual temptations:

“… and we will wed them with virgins. They will desire fruits of all kinds there and live in security. Death they will not taste there except for the first death. And he will keep them from the punishment of the Jahim as a grace from their lord. That is the greatest bliss. (44:51)

Muhammad describes these virgins in the afterlife very vividly so that he can develop the desired effect among his warriors:

“Truly, there is gain for those that fear God: Gardens and berry hedges and girls with swelling breasts, companions and cups filled to overflowing.” (78:31)

In contrast to the enticing promise of Paradise, all “infidels” are threatened with the worst hell:

“…We have prepared a fire for the evil doers so that they will be enclosed as in a tent. And when they cry for help, they will be helped with water like molten metal that burns the faces. How terrible is the drink and how wicked their place of rest!” (18:29)

Muhammad’s fantasy knew no limits where it had to do with the deterring portrayal of suffering in hell:

“For those who are now unbelieving, their clothing will be singed by fire; boiling water will be poured over their heads so that what is in their bellies and their skin will melt. And iron clubs have been determined for them. As often as they try to escape the distress, they will be driven back to it; and that means: Taste the punishment of burning.” (22:19)

The prophet also promised earthly goods, which he very easily has taken away from the “infidels.” And thus, in the Quran there is a complete Sura that bears the name “The Spoils.” For himself, he secured a 20% commission:

“And know that whatever you may take as spoils, a fifth of that belongs to Allah and his emissary and the relatives and the orphans and those in need and the son of the way, if you believe in Allah and in that which we have sent down to our servant on the day of decision, the day when both hosts met together; and Allah has authority over all things.” (8:41)

So motivated, the Muslim armies were able to subdue the Arab peninsula in just a few years.

“Allah has promised much booty, which you will make, and he has given this quickly over to you and has held the hands of men from you so that this will be a sign for the devout, and that he will lead you on a straight path.” (48:20)

This way, Islam expanded with lighting speed in all directions because Allah promised rich spoils throughout:

“And another part of the spoils that you have failed to obtain, Allah has done so in his power. And Allah has power over all things.” (48:21)

The quickly growing armies were instructed to leave their homeland in order to carry the battle to other lands, and thus increase Islam’s dominion:

“Those that believe and migrate away, and fight with their goods and their blood for Allah’s sake receive the highest rank with Allah; and they are the ones who will overcome.” (9:20)

With such godly instructions in their baggage, the Muslim armies were able, even after Muhammad’s death in 632, to plow through unprecedentedly successful campaigns all the way to France.

“Move out, light and heavy, and fight with your goods and your blood for Allah’s sake! It is better for you, if you only knew it!” (9:41)

A disregard for this philosophy of expansion brings serious consequences with it:

“If you do not move out, he will punish you with painful punishment, and will choose another people in your place, and you will certainly will not be able to hurt him. And Allah has the power over all things.” (9:39)

Muhammad also convinced the Muslims of a superior position of exception, which principally means the justification for the takeover of power in any country:

“You are the best fellowship that has ever existed for the people. You will command that which is right and forbid the wrong, and you will believe in Allah. And if the people of the scriptures had believed, it would have been good for them! There are believers among you, but the majority of them are evil doers.” (3:110)

The “people of the scriptures” are Christians and Jews. Everyone among them who doesn’t believe in Allah are therefore evil doers. In the course of taking over power, the humiliation of those in other faiths is highest law:

“Humiliation is commanded for them wherever they are met, unless they would be secure because of their bond with Allah or with the people. And they draw to themselves the anger of Allah, and poverty is commanded for them because they denied Allah’s signs and unjustly murdered the prophets. Such a thing happens since they were rebellious and transgressors.” (3:112)

Every dissident thinker is warned about resistance:

“Truly, those that resist Allah and his emissary will certainly be humiliated, even as those who were humiliated before them; and truly, we have already sent clear signs down. And the infidel will be imparted with a shameful sign.” (58:5)

The principle of subjugation and demand for tribute can also be best recognized from the supposedly peaceful period of islamic government in Spain. For in “Al Andalus” relative quietness ruled when the Jews and Christians bowed to massive pressure, submitted themselves as second-class people, accepted considerably fewer rights and paid additional taxes.

“Fight against those who do not believe in Allah and in the last day, and those who do not declare forbidden what Allah and his emissary have declared forbidden, and those who do not follow the true faith – from those who have received the scriptures until they pay tribute from their own hand in complete submission.” (9:29)

Mercy exists in Islam only among one another in the Umma, the fellowship of Muslims. Infidels, on the other hand, deserve harsher forms of handling:

“Muhammad is the emissary of Allah. And those who are with him are harsh against the infidels, but merciful to each other. You see them bow in prayer, prostrate themselves and strive for Allah’s grace and favor. Their character can be seen in their faces: the signs of prostration.” (48:29)

The one who resists Islam is threatened with the worst punishment. Long-term pPeaceful coexistence with such an ideology is impossible.

“The lord instructed his angels: “I am with you; therefore, strengthen the believers. Into the hearts of the unbelievers I will cast fear. Therefore, slit their throats and strike every finger off from them!” (8:12)

Europe has defended itself successfully throughout the centuries against the islamic attempts of invasion: 732 Poitiers, 1529 Vienna, 1571 Lepanto and 1683 Vienna yet again. Islam has never belonged in Europe, but it has constantly wanted to conquer it. It didn’t work militarily, so now they are attempting to do so by stealth. Thus it behooves every European with common sense to make the statement: Islam, at least in its 1400 year old empirically comprehensible from, should also not be allowed in Europe!

Dutch politician Geert Wilders says the following about this:

“Islam is not a religion but an ideology that labels itself through murder and killing. We Europeans have the duty to resist it.”

If the islamic associations and organizations in Europa do not distance themselves in an obliglatory way from the Sharia, the verses in the Quran that legitimize violence and killing, from the discrimination against those of other faiths, from the oppression of women and from the sole claim to world power, then there is the threat, considering developments in demographics, of the complete islamization of the continent within few decades.

The original German article of this Quran analysis can be found here.

PI Munich is in the process of working on the production of a video, which is extremely time consuming, about the world’s most dangerous book. If you would like to support Michael Stürzenberger’s volunteer educational and informational work, you can do so through the bank connection listed below:

Deutsche Kreditbank
Michael Stürzenberger
Account Number: 1014947137
Bank Routing Number: 120 300 00

Posted by byzanz on PI / Translation: Anders Denken

Posted by byzanz on PI / Translation: Anders Denken

(By Michael Stürzenberger)

Welt Online makes a striking remark under the headline: “Parliament of the Beards – The Islamists now rule”:

The Egyptian parliament has truly never seen so many beards since its founding in 1923 in the British Mandate Authority. More than ten million voters cast their vote for the Muslim Brotherhood – that is 47 percent. Most of them wear suits.

Another 7.5 million Egyptians, or 25 percent, voted for the radical islamic party of the Salafists. They immediately announced that they would have their representatives swear on the Sharia, the theocratic-islamic law. However, the confrontation fails to materialize.

The men in long beards and white robes read the universal oath from the paper well: “I swear by God that I will maintain the integrity of the nation and the Republican system. I will care for the interests of the people. The Constitution and the law, I will respect.” A few radical islamists add the sentence fragment “as long as this does not contradict the laws of God” and thereby earn sharp criticism.

Allah will soon show in Egypt how things go. The Potsdamer Neuesten Nachrichten already reports of a “Tumult in the Egyptian Parliament“:

In the morning, shortly before ten o’clock, the first of 498 newly elected met at the rear entrance of the highly secured dome building, being received with applause and “Allah is great” calls. (…)

Inside the assembly room, the representative roll-call then started with an oath. For three hours, senior chairman Mahmud al-Saqqa had each individual swear, himself a corpulent jurist from the ranks of the liberal Wafd faction, who, in spite of his 81 years doesn’t give the impression that he will put up with contradiction. When ultraconservative attorney Mamduh Ismail of the Salafist Truth Party added to the oath “I swear to maintain the security of the nation and the interest of the people as well as observe the laws and the Constitution,” but on his own impulse he added the words, “unless the laws of God be offended,” the energetic senior chairman made him repeat the oath formula so long that the devout man finally gave up and did without his theocratic oath. He immediately turned the microphone away from other Salafists that followed this example. A request of the devout ones to interrupt the session for midday prayer was mopped aside with annoying gestures.

There were already the first tumults and vociferous verbal battles in the choice for the heads of parliament and his representatives, especially since the factions had agreed last week on the distribution of offices. And thus, the highest post went in the mentioned vote to Saad El-Katatini, former speaker for the Muslim Brotherhood. Representatives became members of the Salafists and the liberal Wadf party, which entered parliament as the third strongest faction. According to the rules of business, the heads of parliament have a strong political position. They determine the agenda; they can stop debate over specific subjects – a power of decision that especially the twelve remaining small opposition factions look upon in concern.

The “Süddeutsche Zeitung” adds:

The election victory of the Islamists on the Nile is official: The Muslim Brotherhood will be the strongest power in the new Egyptian parliament, followed by the radical islamic Salafists. The young revolutionaries from Tahrir are, in contrast, hardly represented – just as little as women and Christians.

The Egyptians voted green. Green is the color of hope and the color of Islam. The voters provided the islamic parties with more than 70 percent of the seats in parliament, coupled with the hope of a social revolution.

The strongest political power is the Muslim Brotherhood: after the official results published on Saturday, the Party of Freedom and Justice, which followed the Muslim Brotherhood, was able to gather 47 percent of the votes. It will be represented in parliament with 235 representatives and has already announced that they will nominate Saad al-Katatni as their general secretary. In addition, they stated that they would improve the health, education and supply systems.

The parties that could be ascribed to the so-called democratic movement came right at 3.4 percent. Islam and democracy – two worlds that couldn’t be more different, are colliding in Egypt. And in Tunisia, Libya, Syria…

(Hat Tip: TheAnti2007, Lepanto)

Posted by byzanz on PI / Translation: Anders Denken

(By Michael Stürzenberger)

According to Conny Axel Meier, managing director for the Pax Europa Citizens’ Movement (BPE), the OIC has for two years been operating an office for the battle against “islamophobia.” Sören Kern reports the following at europe news about the wheeling and dealing by the internationally well networked islamic organization:

The European Union has offered to be host for the next meeting of the so-called Istanbul Process, an aggressive attempt by the islamic countries to make criticizing Islam an international crime.

The announcement followed less than a month after the United States hosted their own conference over the Istanbul Process in Washington, DC.

The Istanbul process – whose explicit goal it is to anchor a global ban into international law against any critical examination of Islam and the islamic Sharia – is promoted by the Organization for Islamic Cooperation (OIC), a block of 57 islamic countries.

Located in Saudi Arabia, the OIC has longed pressed the European Union and the United States to impose limits on the freedom of opinion and speech regarding Islam.

But now, the OIC has doubled its efforts and finds itself in a diplomatic offensive to convince the Western democracies to enforce Resolution 16/18 of the UN Human Rights Council that calls for all countries to battle against “intolerance,” negative stereotyping and stigmatization of … religions and faiths.”

The plan, therefore, is to make this UN Resolution 16/18 flow into a law of the EU so that it is possible to muzzle all Islam-critical people in Europe. This censorship, this massive restriction of free opinion and speech, this backslide into dictatorial practices of oppression is getting, in all seriousness, diplomatic support:

Resolution 16/18, that was adopted at the main headquarters of the UN Human Rights Council, plays a pioneering role in the efforts to advance the international legal concept in connection with the denigration of Islam.

However, the HRC resolution – and likewise the OIC promoted resolution 66/167 that was quietly approved by the 139-member UN General Assembly – remain inefficient as long as strong support in the West is missing.

Therefore, the OIC landed a political coup when the Obama administration agreed to set up a three-day conference on the Istanbul Process in Washington on December 12-14, 2011. In this, the US gives the OIC political legitimacy that it has sought for the initiative to globalize the ban against critique of Islam.

Following Obama’s lead, the European Union wants to bring itself into the activities by serving as host for the next Istanbul Process summit in July 2012.

The EU appears to be caving in, and OIC-”General” Ihsanoglu is exulting:

Up to this point, the European Union has kept the OIC initiative at arm’s length. But Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, the General Secretary of the OIC, states according to the view of the International Islamic News Agency (IINA), that the offer to set up the meeting represents a “qualitative change” of the activities toward the phenomenon of islamophobia.

The direction of impact for these plans to muzzle is obviously against the strengthening Islam-critical parties in Europe:

The “Istanbul Process,” by means of the meeting taking place in Europe, which is more strongly smitten by the phenomenon of islamophobia and antagonism against Islam, has gained additional momentum.”

The OIC is especially irritated over its incapability of silencing the increasing number of democratically elected politicians in Europe who are expressing concerns about Muslim immigrants’ refusal to integrate in their countries and the consequent establishment of parallel islamic societies in many parts of Europe.

Following IINA, “Ihsanoglu said that the growing role of the extreme right in the politics of numerous European lands has become stronger than the capacity of the organization (OIC); he explained that the extreme right, which hates Muslims, has become leverage in the hand of politicians. He also added that the climb of the extreme right through elections has become a issue that cannot be opposed when considering the democratic way by which these extremists achieve their positions. As an example, he referred to the referendum that was held in Switzerland and which, through the voting decision of the Swiss citizens, ended in a ban against the erection of minarets.

In other words, the OIC is now looking for support from the unelected bureaucrats, in the headquarters of the European Union in Brussels, to issue a pan-European law over “hate speech” (national incitement), to regulate through decree what 500 million European citizens – including their elected politicians – can say about Islam and what they can’t.

The OIC, therefore, intends through undemocratic means to bring critique of Islam to silence. Here is a short interview with BPE director Conny Axel Meier:

How large do you estimate the danger to be that the OIC can come through with the “Istanbul Process”?

Now, the idea that the Istanbul Process will lead directly to the desired result, that is the prohibition of blasphemy and criticism of Islam, is rather improbable. However, only so much a result as is fought for in the diplomatic arena with which both sides can live and sell as a success. It was that way as well in December at the 2nd Conference of the Istanbul Process in Washington where Hillary Clinton buckled and guaranteed future accommodation on the part of the US regarding this issue, even though the First Amendment of the US Constitution point-blank codifies freedom of speech and allows little wiggle room for interpretations.

How would this affect German law if this UN Resolution 16/18 would be implemented?

The danger appears more to be that a decree or edict on the part of the EU, which has been placed over national laws, will lever out the national laws and thereby render them useless. With a so-called EU guideline, as was often the case before, they won’t hold back, and the national legislature will not be asked first. This will then come directly out of the EUSSR politburo.

Would this be the end of Islam critique?

Certainly not. There have been many prohibitions in recent history that punished unfavorable opinions. And there were and are more attempts to do so. Sooner or later they have altogether failed or will threaten to fail. However, the fear is that the persistent appeasement of the educational elite will soon be able to degenerate into tyranny, and critics of Islam will have an even worse position and have to employ even more public courage for democracy, freedom and human rights. We will do everything in our power to prevent legitimate criticism of a totalitarian ideology from being punished as “racism” or “blasphemy.”

Posted by byzanz on PI / Translation: Anders Denken

The “Rheinische Post” writes:

Fatal Quarrel Over Gynecologist Visit: Because he allegedly killed the baby of his girlfriend by boxing, a 21-year-old from the Münster region must now go to prison for two years and nine months.

The Rheine district court sentenced the young man on Wednesday for illegal abortion. According to the court, he intentionally dealt his female partner a heavy pounding in the belly during a quarrel last March. The 19-year-old was in her seventh month of pregnancy. The baby died two days after an emergency Caesarean section.

The cause of the quarrel was a gynecologist visit. The pregnant woman had had a gynecological examination on the day of the crime – for the first time by a man. “That didn’t please you,” the judge told the accused during sentencing. The German with Afghan roots had made serious accusations against his girlfriend. It later led to the attack. The judge said of the act: “There is no reason for such a thing, and there is no justification. The child was viable. According to everything we heard, he came into the world healthy.”

The 19-year-old girlfriend comes from a German Catholic family. She had always been treated by a woman. She had found out only in the treatment room that this time a man would be operating the ultrasound machine – and allowed it. She was in the seventh month. When her partner came into the practice and saw that, he was silent right away, then later enraged. “He was upset that a doctor examined me. It wasn’t the first time that he was jealous.

He visited her late in the evening. There was arguing. “I said: I don’t want to be with you any longer. That’s when he freaked out.” He beat her with his fist in her belly. “He said: ‘You will not bring my child into the world alive,’” the delicate woman described and then cried.

A court physician who examined the child stated: “We usually see such injuries in court medicine after traffic accidents where pregnant women were involved.”

When one considers that unborn handicapped children can be killed with a shot of poison up until right before the birth in the Federal Republic of Germany, this was an exemplary sentence for the protection of life. PI reader Mike P. from Rheine observed the trial for us:

Unfortunately, I read only this morning around 9 that the trial of the accused Sherzai for interruption of pregnancy would take place. I was then on site around 10:50 in order to observe this procedure.

A camera team from WDR as well as a local reporter were on site for reporting. The newspaper reporter especially gave everyone without exception the impression of a 60s liberal, from his clothing to his actions, the do-gooder reporting was already set for the next few days.

In the process of various pauses, I was able to speak with a few of the victim’s loved ones as well as the victim herself. The victim told me that she was hassled many times for an interview especially by the WDR reporters, but she constantly told them that she didn’t wish to make a statement.

Outside the familiar surroundings of the victim, however, I wasn’t so clever during the whole course of the trial. For her loved ones were Germans, German-Turks or Turks. A young German-Turk girl told me that she, too, had been together with the victim and that back then he would break out in uncontrolled fits of violence because of his jealousy. Besides that, it was read out in the trial that the accused came from a very devout home; his family was able to flee from Afghanistan in the turmoil of war, and that the father had also been violent.

Furthermore, it was reported that the accused was no stranger. Thus, between 2007 and 2009 he attracted attention many times for driving without a valid driver’s license, and, in spite of much prompting, did not carry out his community service.

The district attorney saw a certain lack of maturity in him and asked for 2 years and 6 months juvenile detention for the accused.

And even though the newborn lived two days after the emergency delivery, the trial proceeded only on the basis of interrupted pregnancy and not due to negligent or intentional homicide.

The defense argued that it couldn’t be proven 100% that the massive, blunt impact on the belly of the pregnant woman was really responsible for the death of the child and called for acquittal.

However, that had already been presented before in a believable fashion by the medical consultant. According to him, only a serious traffic accident or even the massive hits to the belly of the pregnant woman could ultimately produce fatal injuries for the baby.

After short deliberation, the judge read the sentence around 3:20 p.m.: 2 years and nine months.

After the trial, I asked the defense attorney whether he would challenge the sentence. He told me that he would first have to examine the files and the sentence and to be able to plan further steps.

Therefore, whether and how this story continues remains to be seen…

By the way, Ahmad Sherzai is meanwhile under investigation for extortion. The presumed victim: his own mother.

PI articles on the subject:

» Unborn Child Punched to Death: Trial Starts Tomorrow (English)
» Muslim Beats Pregnant Wife in Rheine (German)

Posted by PI / Translation: Anders Denken

‘Foreign man in long white robe’ stabbed three people at random yesterday in a coffee shop.

From Joost Niemöller, Dagelijkse Standaard

Update: Other than first reported, none of the three victims died.

Yesterday in the Piramide coffee shop in Bussum, three random people were stabbed. One of the three allegedly died, although, the one didn’t according to the politically attached report in the Bussums Niews. The report about the perpetrator is much shorter in many newspapers.

De Telegraaf simply reports:

Bystanders describe the perpetrator as a man in a white robe.

Het Parool is even shorter:

a man

At NOS, they found that to be too much information. They ended up with:

The perpetrator

We become a little more knowledgeable with the local press. The Gooi- en Eemlander gives a somewhat more precise description of the man’s appearance:

He was clothed in a white robe with a black jacket over it.

In an earlier report by De Gooi- en Eemlander is the description:

The likely perpetrator, a foreign man in a white robe and black jacket

The fact that this has to do with a foreign man, and that he wore a white robe (in other places, we also read about a long white robe) and a black jacket, is kept out of the newspaper in the later reports. Why is that? We can think of a very good reason. We are not allowed to think bad things of foreign men in long white robes, thus we, in any case, had better not know.

From the descriptions by witnesses of the incident, it appears that it was the matter of a wild, random stabbing spree in which three persons turned out injured.

A eyewitness report in the Gooi- en Eemlander:

The somewhat older man is a regular visitor of the coffee shop on the Kapelstraat. There were around ten, fifteen people sitting in the coffee shop when the knife bearer ran in. “The atmosphere was very relaxed, as usual.” According to the man, there was no noticeable speaking before the stabbing spree. “He simply stabbed someone twice in the chest. A friend of mine tried to overpower him and was stabbed in the back. They weren’t very well off.” How the third man came to be injured is unknown by the regular customers. “I fled to the bathroom amid all the tumult. ‘Get the cramps, though, I’m not going to let myself be stabbed,’ I thought.”

From an audio recording by RTV Noord Holland it has just recently come out, according to two girls speaking for a friend who was there, that it was somebody ‘not of Dutch origin.’ According to them, the perpetrator ran in but sat inside. He stabbed one of those present directly in the heart.

In another audio fragment on the RTV Noord Holland site, a speaker for the police said that the perpetrator was ‘somebody from Bussum.’ So, there we have to deal for the time being with official position.

A puzzling incident. According to Het Hart van Nederland, the man in question was supposedly schizophrenic, but didn’t give a source.

The Islam-critical website Vlad Tepes, however, gives an explanation that is possibly not quite so strange:

My Dutch source on all this tells me that all cases of ‘Sudden Jihad Syndrome’ by Moroccan Muslims is always referred to as by “schizophrenics”.

Islam critic Daniel Pipes has given this name to sudden outbreaks of Jihad for which a number of examples exist and that are for the most part covered up by the media.

It doesn’t look to me at all like such a strange idea is spoken of here. The long white robe. The dark jacket. The foreign background. The relatively young age. There’s still hope that the authorities and the media won’t stay stuck too long in their politically correct spasms and come out with the facts.

Source: “Was steekpartij in Bussum uitbarsting Jihad?” in the Dagelijkse Standaard / Translation: Anders Denken

the Internet portal ‘Politically Incorrect’ is part of an international network of Islam haters and Muslim stalkers. This is confirmed by research conducted by the Frankfurter Rundschau.

Vulgar? Sometimes. When the truth is shown, it can sometimes be a bit vulgar. One only has to look through the pages both on PI German and PI English to see this is the case. But when reading the articles in which vulgar material might be portrayed, the nasty truth about the parties involved is also portrayed. Also, it would be recommended to take a good look at where and who the vulgarity is coming from. One can only act or react properly to a situation when presented with all of the facts. Sadly, however, the left-wing media like to leave out that which doesn’t fit into their paradigm of beauty, and thus the whole truth doesn’t get said, or it becomes seriously twisted so that the words may be true, but in an alter-universe.

Uninhibited? Yes. When informing the public, the truth should be uninhibited. Period. End of story.

The reports and contributions that PI posts are well-documented – most of the time from the left-wing media itself. PI simply finishes the job of making sure the truth is presented – completely. Again, one only has to look at the articles on PI in both languages to see the documentation behind the articles posted here. And if the media wish to accuse PI of fostering hate, then by transitive logic, they are attacking their own reporting which has been used in documenting many of the articles on this site.

Racist? Absolutely not. As PI has shown countless times, it stands against racism and oppression, and for freedom of speech. And yes, PI does stand against systems that present themselves as religions, but in reality and practice function like a rogue state bent on world domination. Islam is a fine example. It is supraracial. There are Indonesians, Malaysians, Chinese, English, Americans, Europeans, Africans, etc. who are Muslims. Thus to question the principles that Islam lays down is simply not racist. It is also not hate speech to show when a system such as Islam abuses its followers. Consider the following practices in Islam: stoning, honor killing, hanging of homosexuals, deceit, fraud. All of these are allowed to further the gospel of Islam according to the Qur’an, not to mention the issue of forced marriages as well. This is information that can be obtained from well-documented articles on PI.

Again, there are many well-documented articles and downloadable essays that show forth this fact. The MSM simply gets in a dither because PI does not mince words about what is really going on in the world. Thus, they must categorize us in the camp of the extreme Right so that they can accomplish their objective of silencing us and others from standing up against their leftist campaigns.

Perhaps BfV should also monitor the MSM as well. They just might find out who is telling the unadulterated truth, and who is telling the truth to fit their comfort zone. They will also find out that the motto under our banner is just that: “Against the Mainstream, Pro-American, Pro-Israel, Against the Islamization of Europe,” and furthermore: “Against the Islamization of Europe,” and, for that matter, Islamization anywhere because of the destruction it brings, and “For Fundamental Laws and Human Rights.”

Freedom of speech is an elementary right. If PI, along with others who are telling the rest of the story, is suppressed, then we are one more step toward totalitarianism in Europe and in the world.

Check us out. You will find that the information conveyed under the banner is the unadulterated truth. Pretty or not.

Posted by PI

Don’t believe it could happen in the good ole’ US? What about the Christmas Day family massacre in Texas? Or the New Jersey man who had his wife killed? Or perhaps, the Somali sex slavery ring which you can read about here?

And don’t forget 9/11!

Make no mistake. It can happen and is beginning to happen in the United States of America. This kind of violence and crime has been going on for years in Europe, and if you wish to see what will come our way, just read more articles on this website. It is here to inform you about the truth – that the mainstream media will withhold from you or hide on some fifth page in a paragraph article.

The current administration is encouraging Muslim business to be built up in this country. The MSM is already on their side. Notice the program on The Learning Channel – All American Muslim

Can it happen? Yes. And it is happening. Although, thanks to the MSM, not quite directly before our eyes.

Yet.

–Anders Denken

Posted by PI

Our newspapers and politicians often lie to themselves, their readers and voters, while some decision or law is exchanged with reality. The Greek government made difficult decisions about austerity measures; which means then that we can again give them money. Or in Turkey, religious freedom is in the law, and that is graded positively by Brussels; nothing more stands in the way of their joining the EU. One never reads about the fact that the Christian cloisters are in reality being cheated out of land and property, and no Catholic could ever become a driver for the governor of the smallest province.

And this affects the whole world. The foul yellow press prints what certain agencies prepare, self-research is too expensive, to troublesome and apparently they also aren’t interesting. Der Spiegel writes a critical article here about the Imam wedding in Turkey. Great! Super! Agreed, but even in this article one gets the impression that everything is copied from articles in other newspapers. And since the Spiegel correspondent in Istanbul doesn’t know Turkish, it apparently comes from the English division of the Hürriyet (newspaper). In any case, everything can be read there. SPIEGEL doesn’t research anything in East Anatolia; that’s too far away and too arduous! In this vein, the totally useless correspondents of taxpayer TV are totally bad with their blah-blah-blah commentaries.

Posted by kewil on PI / Translation: Anders Denken

In the opinion of the PVV, the queen, by doing this, is legitimizing the oppression and discrimination of women. PVV representatives Geert Wilders, Joram van Klaveren and Andre Elissen are asking questions in the Dutch parliament because of the “sad performance.” The PVV would like to find out from Prime Minister Mark Rutte (VVD) and Geerd Leers (CDA), Minister for Immigration and Asylum, what they think about said garment. Moreover, the party wants to know whether this “sad presentation” couldn’t have been stopped. After the visit in Abu Dhabi, the Dutch queen will be travelling on to Oman.

» More photos of the head-covered Queen Beatrix in Abu Dhabi here

(Source: elsevier.nl / Translation: Günther W.)

Posted by PI / Translation: Anders Denken)

Why does one hear so little from Mazyek and consorts here in our country, who wouldn’t hesitate for a second to begin screaming if southern Nigeria’s Muslims would be driven out?

The pattern playing out right now in Nigeria and apparently being completed with success is spreading throughout the world. Muslims “purify” their area completely from non-believers, but settle in the areas of non-believers and begin right away to play the part of the offended if the despised infidels don’t like it. This can be seen in Turkey where the non-Muslims were cleaned out, which was called population exchange but in actuality was an ejection and mass murder. In Turkey, there are almost only Muslims, but in Greece’s northwest, the Muslims have remained. There wasn’t too much of an exchange, or at least in a certain direction. Before this, the Arabian peninsula was purged of infidels, but who are allowed to come when they need somebody to get them out of hot water, which the proud sons of the wilderness are either incapable of or too cowardly to do so themselves. That always applies when the Muslim ratio is not met, which we can learn on German streets that it comes to around five to one. In the Philippines a similar thing is occurring. In southern Mindinao, Abu Sayyaf has bitten hard and are driving out or kidnapping Christians for ransom. But other Muslims are spreading themselves unhindered in every region of the Philippines against the will of the population who would rather see these Muslims immediately driven off the islands in the direction of Malaysia. But that is only being said behind a held up hand where the government stands for peace between the religions.

Peace between religions is really only possible when Islam is not involved. Islam has written down in its constitution (Quran) the non-respect toward those of other faiths, and the infidels can only have success if they orient themselves according to the Quran. Unfortunately, that hasn’t gotten through to our politicians. In this country [Germany], one desires to engage Islam with the neighborly love of Christianity while at the same time demonize Christianity — even when the party name has a “C” in it.

As for Nigeria, it remains to be said: Nobody among us cares what’s happening there. Nothing will come outside of a few half-hearted suggestions to the Nigerian Al Qaeda, regardless of how many Christians are being brutally murdered. But woe if a hundred or more Muslims would be driven out of the south, then we will see how much we owe to the people of Africa because of neighborly love. The leftists will scream indignantly; Roth will look involved and shock us with another dance – we don’t deserve anything else – and organize a candle chain that has washed itself. And the party with the “C”? Does it really still exist?

Posted by PI / Translation: Anders Denken

Idea reports:

Churches in Hesse have aided the islamic social service “Green Crescent” in the education of volunteer hospital chaplains. It involved a “very successful cooperation, the charitable organization, which is located in Frankfurt/Main, communicated.

Participating in the education, according to the statements, were departmental representatives from the Hesse-Nassau Church and the (Catholic) diocese of Limburg. As idea found out, there were ten Muslim chaplains educated in the previous year. In addition, in January, the Green Crescent will begin a course for Islamic emergency chaplain that will likewise be accompanied by the Hesse-Nassau church. The education stretches over a half year and takes place one weekend each month. Islamic scholars and evangelical partners are collaborating as lecturers. The organization is counting on 20 to 25 interested individuals. The Green Crescent was founded in 2006 in Frankfurt and sees itself as “transcending the bounds of confession,” although it provides guidance primarily for Muslims. It is active in the areas of nursing service, social and family counseling, private tutoring and islamic pastoral care. Of around six million residents in Hesse, almost 300,000 are Muslims.

Many Christian Missionaries around the world are often active in islamic countries under danger to their lives in order to bring the Christian message of love to people. At the same time, the Church here in Germany is working on sacrificing its Christian fundamentals for Islam.

Contact:

» info@ekhn.de
» ordinariat@bistumlimburg.de

Posted by PI / Translation: Anders Denken

One would like to help oneself often to these – which, of course, is not allowed. A Muslima (Muslim woman) named Ayesha Hübsch, apparently the daughter of Hadayatulla Hübsch, did it anyway and thus she along with her [female] companion got into a quarrel the employee in charge of security at the time. In a following conversation with the manager, the two head-covered women felt unsatisfied. After the Lübecker Nachrichten newspaper let Ayesha Hübsch make an incredibly long complaint about her suffering, watchman Manfred Buchholz was finally allowed to give his version of the story:

Kruse and Buchholz confirmed that some customers reached into the fortune cookie pot and that it wasn’t always noticed. In this concrete case, Buchholz became very watchful of the two female customers because the older one of the two had already taken a cookie. On the accusation by Ayesha Hübsch that he held the hand of her aunt back when she reached into the drum, Buchholz countered: “I didn’t touch the lady.” Incidentally, the two lady customers didn’t welcome any discussion, he was offended most seriously – with scatological language. Ayesha Hübsch furthermore refuted this: “I never say anything like that. That is not my style.” She did, however, admit to having screamed.

Ayesha Hübsch did, however, receive a coupon from manager Peter Kruse as compensation for the trouble she suffered. However, a cheap coupon is truly not worth the words in light of the hellish torture from Miss Hübsch. Therefore, here is our recommendation: Let Ayesha Hübsch fill her hijab with fortune cookies. Because if a devout Muslima supposedly berated an infidel Harbi “in the worst way” – and that in scatological language – that for the sake of us at PI is too hard to imagine.

(Hat Tip: Wächter der Wüste)

Posted by PI / Translation: Anders Denken

Posted by kewil on PI / Translation: Anders Denken