Matthias Heinzel writes the following:

A few days after the murder of a 26-year-old female student, the violent act is now being used for religious and racist propaganda. Several Israeli and German Internet media report that an Arab was the perpetrator and has already been arrested. None of that is the truth, the Göttingen police assures us.

Göttingen. In the version by media outlet Arutz Sheva (Israel), Haolam.de and Eipnews, the reasons behind the murder of the female student sound something like the following: The family of the victim lives in an Arab village in Galilee. The mother of the 26-year-old, though, is a Jew, which according to Jewish belief means that the daughter is a Jew as well. The police suspect this issue and, therefore, suspect a nationalist-ideological motive as cause for the murder, and have already determined a suspect – a citizen from one of Israel’s neighboring Arab countries. Meanwhile, the police have also confirmed that this suspect has already been arrested. Why and with what legitimacy the suspect was staying in Germany is still unknown. Ynetnews, however, reports that the investigators went on the assumption that the 26-year-old was the victim of a sexual assault.

Everything was clearly invented and fabricated, Jasmin Kaatz, speaker for the Göttingen police, says. A political motive for the murder being ruled out at the time. By the way, the murdered 26-year-old was of Muslim faith. Besides that, there is still no indication of a sexual offense. Important indicators in connection with the investigations are the facts that the apartment was not violently broken into, and apparently nothing was stolen or robbed. Furthermore, the Göttingen district attorney also is ruling out xenophobia as a cause.

A [Göttingen] Tageblatt survey with Arutz Sheva regarding the origin of the questionable information remained unanswered. The true reason for the story of the alleged criminal activity of an Arab can actually be better found in the ideological background of the participating media. Arutz Sheva, for example, is an Israeli media network considered to be religious-Zionist and an anti-Arabic mouthpiece for the Israeli settler movement. A whole array of various Internet media, many of them decidedly Israel-friendly, have apparently accepted the information there without any followup research.

Reader Adam Danial Poznanski writes the following splendidly in a comment regarding this Israel bashing:

Even the murder of a female Israeli – on German soil – is being used by the inherently socialist German press for an Israel hunt! This article serves in the smallest way for the information of the reader about the reasons of the murder that is allegedly as good as settled. Of course (!) there is nothing political behind it!! An Arab who murders a half-Jewess with an Israeli passport is generally left out for noble reasons which don’t have to be mentioned by the author. On the other hand, the author sees in this a necessity to go on about the propaganda of Jewish-Israeli media. I DEMAND an immediate STATEMENT OF OPINION from the CHIEF EDITOR!!!

If the victim should in fact be “of Muslim faith,” this could likewise be a motive for murder. The attractive student lived in a civilized and Western fashion.

» E-mail: m.heinzel@goettinger-tageblatt.de

Posted by PI / Translation: Anders Denken

“We have the setback of the 70s not the least [...] to thank for the fact that the others have taken possession of the language, have used the language as a weapon, that they have created ideas, filled others with different meaning and then used them all at once as a projectile against us, and not without success. Therefore, for me, the battle for the language is one of the most essential requirements for intellectual self-assertion.

(By Rosinenbomber, PI-Münster)

The quote above comes from no less than CSU bedrock Franz Josef Strauss. His rise from son of a butcher to one of the most polarizing politicians in modern German history would have been unthinkable without a well-contrived speech agenda. And Strauss’ estimation has lost none of its validity to this day: Anyone who wishes to bring about political changes must occupy ideas and defend the dominance of the airspace around them. If their spokesman had ignored this mantra – the 60s-Liberal ideology would have failed in grand style and would never have been able to penetrate even the tiniest pores of our society. In this article, we would like to take a linguistic inventory and develop strategies for the reacquision of linguistic dominance.

Tolerance, integration, sustainability, social justice – in the country there rules no lack of political ringing of words that present an unhealthy mixture of conceptual obscurity and leftwing connotations. The greatest success of the socialists doubtlessly stems from having achieved that the terms “right” and “extreme right” are now being used synonymously. This is so devastating and disgraceful because by this means anything outside of leftwing ideology can be branded as illegitimate. And so, really only one civilizational certainty should be offered: that along with a democratic leftwing way, there is also a democratic rightwing way that has its place in the politcal landscape. Anyone who denies this has understood nothing about democracy, which depends on the contest for the better argument.

Also, in this place it needs to be emphasized that the position of “political moderate” – readily used by the CDU as a self-description – is subjective and therefore unsuitable as a description. The right-left pattern is not revised, despite all the assertions to the contrary by CDU representatives who shy away from the term “right” as much as the Devil does from holy water. There is simply no convincing alternative. The clear one-dimensionality of this yardstick of political position determining can be easily broken apart when the categories “socio-political (social)” and “economic-political (fiscal)” are added. For Germany, elevations are constantly being produced, for example, since many citizens think socially somewhat to the right while at the same time they can be found to be relatively left, fiscally speaking. The CDU, in its entirety, is an (extremely moderate) rightwing party because it doesn’t represent decidedly leftwing positions in every point.

Now, the one who still doesn’t always want to declare himself publically as rightwing can participate more subtly in the reacquisition of linguistic dominance: by constantly referring to “Neonazis” as “Neo National Socialists” and thereby exposing their socialist character. And by NEVER, NEVER, NEVER calling them “rightwing” or “rightwing radicals,” but rather “rightwing extremists.” By the use of this term, it will become automatically clear that a difference exists between “rightwing” and “extreme rightwing.” The term “rightwing radical,” however, is unsuitable because it sounds too mild and is used in political science (in any case among the followers of the totalitarianism theory) for the characterization of positions that are actually radical and rightwing (see horseshoe diagram).

Another example for the intentional distortion of language is shown by the term “nationalism.” I assert: The majority of the German nation is comprised of nationalists. Don’t you think? Then you ponder for a moment how a nationalist is defined from the pure meaning of the word: According to the definition, it has to do with a person who – in opposition to the communistic utopia of an international state – advocates for the existence of national states and would like to see the interests of his own protected. And note here: The advocates of the national state model have absolutely nothing at all to do with ultranationalists of the NPD ilk.

When you, dear reader, soon fall once again into a heated debate, instead of speaking about “integration,” calmly use “assimilation” (adaptation), and instead of “social equity or justice” use “equity or fairness of achievement.”

(Posted on PI November 10, 2011 / Translation: Anders Denken)

Somehow, the idea floats around in the heads of some here that PI should only be nice and express themselves in a refined fashion like the queen, and then finally they would be accepted by the mainstream media and accepted as a serious partner in the debate. Nothing could be farther from the truth. Our mainstream media, the ruling political science, and the leftwing parties (i.e. Edathy, SPD, communists like SED-Jelpke) would like to spread their ideology uninterrupted and ban, wipe out, isolate and destroy dissident thinkers.

The spiel of leftwing gang after gang is as primitive as it is effective. The ball is thrown back and forth, which the other party picks up and plays it back to the other opponent with renewed drive; the main thing is that the collection of lies continues to swell and influence unsuspecting contemporaries. One fine example is the manipulated discussion for stirring up Constitutional Defense against PI. The concerted effort is summarized here:

The current campaign started with the terrorist Breivik on 7/22/2011. After the initial shock, the search for whom to blam quickly commenced, and the leftwing mob was only too glad to make a direct connection between PI and the mass-murderer. When this didn’t work, the question was disingenuously posed whether it would be possible that also in Germany someone like Breivik might surface, having been stirred up by PI articles, which was thrown to the air with affirmation. On 7/26/2011, the eco-red periodical founded by RAF sympathizers, taz, wrote with concern:

Still unmentioned [in the Constitutional Defense Report 2010] is the central organ for the German enemies of Islam, the blog “Politically Incorrect” (PI). In an intentional stand of defense, PI warns of a self-proclaming religious dictatorship in Germany.” The influential blog is clicked on around 60,000 times each day. 52 “PI groups” around the country are introduced on its homepage.

No doubt, extremely dangerous! Also, on 7/26/11, the same day, Florian Rötzlöffel Rötzer seconded with the same garbage in the pink Telepolis On 8/18/2011, the SED communists made a “little” inquiry with the German federal government under direction from red hairdresser Ulla Jelpke:

Moreover, there is an increasing number of anti-Islamic Internet sites. Where things are often being stirred up in a way that is racist, hostile to foreigners, insulting, filled with hate, and that often promotes violence against people of Muslim faith and Islam, and in general against immigrants from Near- and Middle-East countries.

And further down:

10. How much of the anti-Muslim, racist and violence-encouraging statements does the federal government recognize?

a) Does the federal government consider such expressions of disturbing the public peace and the peaceful cohabitation of people acceptable?

b) How much is the federal government of the persuasion that PI’s confession is distinguished by the Constitution per se as a rightwing orientation compared to that of having a focus contrary to the fundamental order of peace and democracy?

The answer was handed down by the government on 9/2/11, note their conclusion here that anti-Muslim and racist entries were found to be only isolated and in the comment area.

It simply couldn’t be left this way. On 9/12/11, the privately and publically red-leaning hairdresser Jelpke complained on her Internet page that we “don’t show up in brown shirts with Hitler moustaches.” Otherwise her game would have been much easier. Simultaneously – there are coincidences – red aide-de-camp Florian Rötzlöffel Rötzer took up words on 9/12/11 in Telepolis with the information from his bosom buddy Jelpke.

On 9/14/2011, the Dumont press then commenced with their elaborate, song-like campaign with a couple of presumably stolen E-mails or illegally monitored Skype dialogs, blew them up, lied in addition, and portrayed PI as a danger for Germany that should be taken seriously; the only thing missing was the hint of a coup against the state. The article appeared on this day in the Frankfurter Rundschau, the Berliner Zeitung and the Kölner Stadtanzeiger simultaneously (links and commentary here)! One day later came the ready echo from the red-leaning pool of lies, Telepolis.

In the meantime, on 9/17/11 the leftwing Press of the Confederation awakened and began taking shots at a former colleague of PI, a glowing champion and defender of Israel, so that they could shoot her down as a pastor with cruel and devious smears. (This action is still going on.)

On 9/18/11, the rear gun of democracy, der SPIEGEL printed and online, shot its barrel burst. When you compare the texts with the Dumont smears, you’ll notice that there’s nothing new in them, only the same “proofs.” That same day, also on 9/18/11, the Islamic submarine Meli Kiyak served up “her own research” about PI with complete “vulgarity and uninhibited” in the Berliner Zeitung, again the same old rotten stuff.

On 9/26/11, the rear of democracy’s rear gun, the red-leaning, nihilist SPIEGEL was burning, so it plugged together deep psychological analyses of Brevik-PI! One day later, on9/27/11, the barrage of fire from the red-leaning Dumont artillery ensued, Frankfurter Rundschau and Berliner Zeitung appeared with identical articles. The ruminating Geyer intended at all costs to achieve Constitutional Defense monitoring.

After their concoction started to appear as a fad, just two days later, on 9/29/11, they fired their great barrel burst and stated that PI had threatened the secret service. None of that worked, though, for Constitutional Defense would simply not “monitor” PI. On 10/1/11, the leftwing inquiry was flanked once again in the Frankfurter Rundfunk by “Kröver Nacktarsch” Sabine Schiffer.

Anybody who thinks that red nobodies will simply give up have deceived themselves. On 10/31/11, the communist hairdresser Jelpke made another “little” inquiry with the federal government. In this one, the Dumont articles that have meanwhile appeared are named as new evidence, and the government is being asked whether they still maintain that PI is no danger:

We ask the federal government:

1. How much and with what backing does the federal government continue to hold to its assessment found in Bundestag publication 17/6910 with regard to the website Politically Incorrect and other websites and organizations hostile to Islam and Muslims, in light of press reports in the meantime (see previous note)?

Two days ago, on 11/6/11, the rear gun of democracy followed with a rehash. Thus yesterday, on 11/7/11, the second inquiry by the communist Jelpke mentioned above landed in the Bundestag. And so, this has now continued month after month without yielding anything new. Everything simply gets reheated and repackaged. Read whatever you wish, it’s always the same.

Of course, those belonging to the Red Combo are sympathizers such as Antisemitism-Benz who are quoted as authorities, and other informers and secret helpers of the journalists that quote each other mutually, for example, the infamous political blogger Näher and journalist Geyer. They are all on Wiki. The journalists’ smears about PI are collected on leftwing-twisted Wiki as an objective lexicon of truth, and then two weeks later, the erstwhile fabricated web of lies appears in the press as evidence from Wiki. A vicious circulus vitiosus! But the Left is dilligent. Meanwhile, in Wiki there are more footnotes about PI than in the lexicon entry about Jesus Christ!

The photo above shows a panel with a quote from Augstein mounted on the recently inaugurated, new SPIEGEL high-rise in Hamburg. “Tell it like it is!” That has yet to occur with a leftist!

By kewil for PI. Translation by Anders Denken)

This thanksgiving by the Junge Welt lets a little slip out from the catalog of demands by the DGB (German Union Federation) – if only this wouldn’t be so honest – how the people need to be walled in against such fortunes.

In this place we’ll simply say: Thanks for 28 years of securing peace in Europe

for 28 years without the participation of German soldiers in war missions

for 28 years without welfare and unemployment

for 28 years without homelessness, soup kitchens and “panels”

for 28 years of provisions with places for nursery and kindergarten

for 28 years without neonazi “give GAS” posters in the capital city

for 28 years of historical scholarship instead of Guido Knopp documentaries

for 28 years of Club Cola and nude colonies

for 28 years without hedge funds and private-equity grasshoppers

for 28 years without co-payments and second-class medicine

for 28 years of Hohenschönhausen without Hubertus Knabe

for 28 years of perky sex without “wetlands” and Bild expertise

for 28 years of universal education

We also say thank you – to Junge Welt – for the honesty of the long-time fighters against the Right and for religious tolerance – at least or continuously glamorized Islam – that the newspaper so openly expresses the political tastes of the Left Party (photo) which is advertising right next to the picture of the wall murderers.

» Interview with Wolf Biermann about the Left Party:

Biermann in the Interview

Wolf Biermann belongs to those communists because of whom some who are now active in the area of conservative critique of Islam previously felt drawn to the Left. Because Biermann was basically honest, and where could one or can one find this both then and now in politics? The best: He has remained this way. Here is the interview with Wolf Biermann about the Building of the Wall on Deutschlandfunk (Radio Germany) in its entirety. There are texts for which there is no further need of comment:

Christoph Heinemann: 50 years ago tomorrow, the people in the GDR were walled in: August 13, 1961 – clattering pneumatic hammers, GDR troops at the Brandenburg Gate, barbed wire was rolled out, people waving to one another. We asked songwriter Wolf Biermann before this program what goes through his mind when he hears and sees sounds and images from back then.

Wolf Biermann: A feeling of shame passes through my soul because back then, I was among those – this must stay among us and so I’m also saying it on the radio – who were for the building of the wall.

Heinemann: Why?

Biermann: Because back then, I as you know even went from Hamburg to the GDR (East Germany) at 16 years old and was of the opinion that the GDR could become the better Germany, in comparison with the time of the Nazis in any case, but also with West Germany. Indeed, a more just society was supposed to be set up there under the name of socialism. And certainly you know that I come from a communist labor family, that my people were almost all killed during the time of the Nazis, but my mother did survive and had the ambition of making me into a little communist – I was supposed to rescue mankind and for that reason I went to the East at 16 years of age. And then I really saw that socialism didn’t even work in the GDR. Then, of course, I began to criticize them and was of the opinion that the building of the Wall was our fault, not that of the West, not the fault of the headhunters as they were called. And because of this, I was of the opinion that this wall was an act of defeat for us from which we should learn painful lessons. And with this position, as you already darkly suspect, I was not in sync with the party line, the official line of the powers in the GDR.

Heinemann: Which had consequences a late as 1976 for you. Now, back to the explanation: Gesine Lötzsch, the president of the Left Party, has now said that the wall was the result of the Second World War and the German raid on Russia. In a pointed question: Is Hitler responsible for the Wall?

Biermann: Then let’s start with the Thirty Years’ War and Adam and Eve. That is the typical historical view from people with no history, who want to hide, cover up or embellish something and look for anyone to blame in world history, but the most important ones they should find they don’t, namely, they themselves. And this Gesine Lötzsch is, of course, a political heiress of the powers that were to blame for the building of the Wall. That, indeed, is the heritage of this old Stalinist Pact. Also, without Stalin, and without Ulbricht, and without Honecker, they are in my opinion reactionaries, stupid people, who play no good role for the development of mankind and for their own people.

Heinemann: Mr. Biermann, which intentions do you suspect are behind Mrs. Lötzsch’s statements?

Biermann: Of lying her and her party’s way out of the liability that has historically burdened these people. Those are the heirs of the GDR nomenclature, and in truth, financially and politically and morally, or more accurately put, amorally. This is the degenerate pack that oppressed us for decades in the GDR, and of course they’re doing anything they can to piece together a historical image where they can get by with a black eye rather than lose their head.

Heinemann: Berlin historian Hubertus Knabe, on the topic of piecing together a historical image, has accused the West-German sixties liberals that many of them collaborated with the Stasi (translator note: East German State Security), and he talks about the most fruitful reservoir for Stasi informants in the West. Why of all things was this movement so susceptible to this totalitarian way of thinking?

Biermann: Because people are always that way, we know that already. One tries to get out of a certain mire only to fall into the next one. People, unfortunately, are always this way, they can’t do it differently. These sixties liberals wanted to put distance between themselves and the debt-ridden generation of their parents, position themselves against them, ultimately stand bravely for antifascism – and then they fall into the arms of the new, the second dictatorship, as Ralph Giordano rightly called it, and lie in bed with them and go, so to speak, from one hardship and lie to the next hardship. Unfortunately, that’s how it often is in history. And because of this, we apparently need one, two or three, four generations after the collapse of the GDR and Reunification before these drunken swings from one stupidity to the corresponding opposing stupidity … that takes a while.

Heinemann: Mr. Biermann, the signs and support of communist or GDR-socialist organizations, should they be subject to punishment?

Biermann: Oh, I don’t know. Of course, that was criminals; of course, they’re not only guilty before history but most of all before living people whose lives they have destroyed, whom they killed, tortured, humiliated and mutiliated. But: Where does that bring us if the emblem of the GDR is forbidden like the swastika from the Nazi times? The embarassment that happens when such a symbol of criminal power shows up should be grabbed by the horns and used as an opportunity to mingle with the fight of the world over the truth of the process of history, even in the sense of enlightenment.

Well, just lately I experienced it – in the train, a young man addressed me, Mr. Biermann, I am a national socialist, thus a young Nazi, and you were formerly a communist, so we really do belong together. Look, we want the same thing, I only want national socialism and you likewise want international socialism or the like. I tried as well as I could to explain to him that symbols or even slogans – thus phrases are just like symbols, right – keep their significance in the process of history through that which actually happened within these symbols or names.

Look, my father was detained in Nazi times because he was a communist and was tortured and bravely stood against the Nazis, and then was murdered in Auschwitz. For him, the word communism was a holy word. And thus I was raised by my mother as an example, therefore I went at 16 years of age to the GDR. But meanwhile the word communism has come to mean that cynical opposite to a better, more just society for normal people with whom we live here. And because of this, this word has been nailed fast for all time to such historical truths as oppression, muzzling, torture, lies, hypocrisy double and triple exploitation and mass murder of millions of innocent people because Hitler had only twelve years of time and murdered six million Jews, a half-million gypsies that we must not forget in a hurry – but Stalin, the historians disagree whether he murdered only 20 or 80 million innocent people.

Heinemann: Back to the Wall: If the GDR had survived, do you believe that the Wall would have ever become a normal national border?

Biermann: No, no, I don’t believe that at all. With walls that tear a nation apart in time, where humanity needs to grow together as a whole, not only Europe, but the whole world – we are even now painfully experiencing with the whole global crisis –, that would never have been able to continue to exist. And I am glad that I have so wonderfully erred. Namely, I always believed that the Wall would last longer than Wolf Biermann and knew exactly that I would not outlive it. But I am glad that I was able to contribute something with my songs and poems in the GDR, that I was so wonderfully wrong in my determination, that the wall, therefore, did actually fall before I died. That is really wonderful! Nobody could ask more from world history.

Heinemann: We recorded the conversation with Wolf Biermann before this program; you can listen to or read this interview again at dradio.de.

Statements of our interview partners are reproductions of their own opinions. Deutschlandradio does not accept responsibility for the statements of its interview partners in interviews and discussions.

» The interview on Audiostream

The artist Wolf Biermann – timeless, then as now: “I have had enough”

(By Team Quotenqueen for PI. Many thanks to all contributors! Translation: Anders Denken)

Leftwing Junge Welt swaggers:

Following the example of the former Berlin CDU politician René Stadtkewitz, who in October 2010 founded a regional chapter of the rightwing “Freedom” party in the capital, around 50 rightwing individuals assembled on the weekend in Unterhaching near Munich and started the regional chapter of the racist little party there. For the president of the chapter, those who present elected Christian Jung who – according to information by the Bavarian Refugee Council – was employed until just recently by the Immigrant Division of the Munich Department of Regional Administration (KVR).

The Refugee Council is of the opinion that Jung’s political persuasion has been having an effect on his work at the KVR. Whether he has transgressed legal limits is actually clear at the present time. What is clear, however, according to the Bavarian Refugee Council is that his use of liberties afforded him by the authorities has hardly benefitted the individuals in question.

Speaking for the fears of the organization is the fact that Christian Jung is part of the group who published a paper titled “Secure Borders – A Munich Thesis Regarding Immigrant and Integration Policy.” In this thesis, the authors among others state that sentencing for specific crimes should lead to an “automatic deportation” of immigrants, and not just that the corresponding law should be the determining factor for the degree of punishment.

“When a rightwing populist employee within the immigrant authorities is allowed to decide on the fate of refugees, that is like turning the goat into the gardener,” Matthias Weinzierl of the Bavarian Refugee Council said to “Junge Welt.” The Refugee Council is demanding “the further examination of all cases worked on by Christian Jung and, if necessary, the possibility of reentry be granted for those persons who have been deported in said cases.

The Süddeutsche also reports:

Christian Jung worked of all places in the Immigrant Division of the Department of Regional Administration (KVR) before he fell into the public eye as the chapter president of the new Islam-critical ‘Freedom’ Party. The Bavarian Refugee Council has now demanded that all cases processed by Jung be examined by external experts and that deported people, if necessary, be given the possibility of reentry. Vice president of KVR, Claudia Vollmer, doesn’t consider that necessary, though, because ‘up to 90 percent’ of the caseworkers’ decisions ‘are placed under judicial scrutiny.’ The Greens are requesting that Jung, who is currently away on vacation, not be allowed to return to his post.

It’s official now. The Left-Green faction is now feeling the force of the new conservatives in the country. And now they are desperately trying to rescue their totalitarian influences by means of blind incitement and naïve propaganda.

(Translation: Anders Denken)

Particularly interesting was that on the the 24th of February she was assisted by a group of neo-Nazis. Indeed, normally the SP finds no shame in calling Israel the new nazi-Germany like so many other ultra leftwing networks in the Netherlands do. Though the SP sees no harm in representing the interests of people who would like to see the state of Israel annihilated and the Jews exterminated. A while ago Harry van Bommel from the SP had proven himself solidary with Palestinian terrorists in the good company of Greta Duisenberg. This movie shows how Harry van Bommel calls for an intifada (holy war) and even when it becomes obviously apparent that his fellow demonstrators are not only interested in a Palestinian state but also in the total annihilation of the Jewish people (in the background the crowd yells ‘Hamas, hamas, Jews should be gassed’) this wasn’t reason enough for Harry van Bommel to stop his march.

Though the SP had always denied that they meant it this way and Harry van Bommel has had his slap on the wrists by Agnes Kant from the SP. That this is all a charade also becomes pretty obvious when Anja Meulenbelt accepts assistance of neo-Nazis on the 24th of February. She allowed for the neo-Nazis to share her slogans.

‘Shame, shame, blood on your hands’, was sung by SP-members, pro-Palestinian demonstrators and neo-Nazis, but hey who can tell the difference anymore?

Earlier that week, us of the Dutch Defence League also attended a concert of Tzahal, but because we didn’t want to claim the media-attention that the concert had brought we kept a low profile and just sat in the audience. We did however respond to the calls of Ben Kok and utmost sympathetic Judeo-Christian pastor who fights for the interests of Jews and Christians in the Netherlands. Too bad we weren’t there when the neo-Nazis were; I would have loved to ask them a few questions on the matter. A friend of ours however was there that day and when he told the neo-Nazis they should go home, they mocked the Jewish people saying ‘You don’t have a home, you don’t have a country.’

This probably made the day for Anja.

The link between Islamism and Nazism is controversial; it is one of the reasons why Geert Wilders has to face trial in the Netherlands. Specifically the comparison of the Qur’an and mein Kampf, but how unfair is that comparison? Surely anyone who has read the Qur’an can testify to the fact that is full of anti-Semitic texts? How coincidental is it that Hitler was very popular at times in the Arab world? How coincidental is it that certain divisions of the SS consisted entirely of Muslims? And the fact that German soldiers of SS were allowed to practice Islam under Hitler? The fact that grand mufti Mohammad Amin al-Husayni received a considerable salary from Hitler’ Germany and that he was allowed to brainstorm alongside the Germans in attempts to exterminate Jews all over the world?

Untill recently people found it laughable when others saw links between the scriptures of Islam and Nazism and people that warned about it were easily called bunkers or worse; racist. But on a day like the 24th of February it becomes clear once more that it might become ever more hard to deny. It is the double standard of the Netherlands and at the same time a paradox, if you think that every culture and religion is equal do you allow for a culture or religion to want to exterminate others or at least wish for the complete subordination of other cultures and religions? If you’d ask a typical Dutchman this in the context of Nazism, you’d get an immediate and resolute answer ‘No!’, but if you’d ask this in the context of Islam, everybody becomes timorously quiet. Whoever dares to criticize Islam is called racist or xenophobe invariably, but the racism or xenophobia in Islam we don’t mention.

(By Shirai, Dutch Defence League, Picture: keesjemaduraatje)

(By Alster and M.H. with thanks to Lübeck colleague Tobias & Co. / Translation: Anders Denken)

While on the one side of the street a martial demonstration march of diaspora-Tunesians which had started in front of the downtown mosque (!) passed loudly by, several boys who weren’t in agreement with our statements gathered at our info-stand.

They held among other things that Christians were just as violent. They didn’t like the counter-question of whether Christians would blow themselves up then to kill those of other religions. In their difficulty, they called us “racists.” When we then started to explain patiently to them that Islam was no race, they ran out of arguments and had to vent their frustration. While one of them (in the following photo with the blond hair and pierced lips) tried to make off with a packet of flyers and thereby attacked a colleague, a black-clad companion (on the right beside him) wiped all the flyers and brochures off the information table. Unfortunately, we couldn’t hold the two (circled in red) back, but we have a nice picture of them:

We filed a complaint of attempted bodily harm and vandalism with the police that were called over. The police are only too glad to receive relevant clues regarding the criminals.

The passersby in downtown Hamburg had, of course, no sympathy for this violent method of censorship: Through the attacks the attention of several was upon us; they gathered up the flyers, brought them back to the table and took some.

Here are two posters:

Welt Online reports:

During a leftwing demonstration in Berlin against an upcoming eviction of an occupied house things came to a massive outbreak of violence. Followers of the unregimented scene thereby injured several people.

The cause for the demonstration was the announced eviction from the house on Leibigstrasse 14 in Friedrichshain. 25 people are living their without a valid tenant agreement.

Several police officers and a journalist were injured when hooded demonstrators dressed in black threw rocks, bottles and fireworks at the officers and passersby. Several of the independent demonstrators also allegedly attempted to blind the officers with laser pointers. “We estimate the injured to be in the double-digit range,” a speaker for the police said.

The police spoke further of a “sudden discharge of violence that was unforeseen.”

The “discharge of violence” was hardly unforeseeable, as will become clear later in the article:

The inhabitants of the house and their supporters had called for weeks for resistance on February 2nd. On the radical leftwing Indymedia Internet site were the words: “Let it crash; let it bang.” Also violent resistance was also signaled indirectly: “We will not rely on registered actions, but be spontaneous, costly and uncontrollable.”

Spontaneous, costly and uncontrollable, there could be no better way to explain the actions of the Left in this country. One could only imagine that it wasn’t leftwingers but rather rightwing idiots who would be to blame for “injuries in the double-digit range.” It would be the main theme in all the media, and the first human chains would already be in planning. But this time it is indeed the illustrious left, and thus the bulk of the media would rather take care of “more important” things, like for example, the Jungle Camp on RTL! If there were yet proof needed for the mass-stultification of the German people, please: his name is Peer Kusmagk, from now on he’ll be called the Jungle King.

Video of Leftwing Terror in Berlin (of course, right in the middle is Ströbele at 2:36 min. who would rather not see anything of violence):

In this context, a report from the Interior Secret Service AIVD has come to us from the Netherlands that without doubt and ideological deceit names the true political processes.

Since the fundamental conditions in the Netherlands and in German could be considered equivalent, here is the translation of a corresponding article from the TELEGRAAF on November 3, 2010:

“Leftwing much more dangerous than right”

The threat coming from rightwing extremists has almost disappeared. So says the General Information and Security Service (AIVD, Dutch Secret Service) in a report presented yesterday (Nov. 2). In contrast, the real threat comes from leftwing organizations such as the Anti-Fascist Action (AFA) and the Collective Anti-Fascist and -Capitalist Archive (KAFKA), according to the Secret Service. According to the Service, these leftwing clubs employ methods that “violate democratic rule of law.”

The Secret Service classifies AFA and KAFKA overall as dangerous: “AFA is prepared to take the law into their own hands against racism and fascism, with or without violent confrontations. Thus AFA goes into action where the State ‘appears to have neglected’its duty in which rightwing extremist manifestations, for example, have been tolerated. When such demonstrations take place, AFA regularly intervenes with violence or has others do so. This violence then gets pinned on the rightwing demonstrators and used by the AFA as an argument for having demonstrations banned,” according to the AIVD.

A well-known tactic of leftwing extremists is the instigation of foreign youth to interrupt rightwing demonstrations violently, as the Secret Service previously communicated. Local politicians are also pressured into forbidding rightwing demonstrations.

The KAFKA research group is also considered as dubious by the Secret Service: “The group strives in conjunctionwith the AFA to ban anything coming from the public that is deemed to be rightwing. In this antidemocratic effort, both groups employ undemocratic methods such as violence, incitement to violence, intimidation and the hiding of their own identity and true intentions.”

That the real threat coming from the rightwing sector is smaller than often thought springs from the image that AFA and KAFKA foster, according to the Secret Service. According to the Service, they intentionally exaggerate the danger coming from rightwing extremism.

“Thus they derive their right to exist from the threat that comes therefrom and foster the image that this threat is great and growing,” according to the AIVD, who emphatically disputes this image. The number of active rightwing extremists is falling when follwing the AIVD statistics. Three years ago their numbers were estimated at 600; in the meantime, their number has fallen to below 300.

At the beginning of the year, the Secret Service informed of the practices of AFA in a letter to all the mayors in which false pretenses are undertaken to compel local administrations to ban the assemblies of parties that are in their eyes “rightwing.” “If AFA receives information about a demonstration planed by rightwing individuals, somebody appears at community administrations and before owners of convention centers and warns of material damages that could arise from such demonstrations. However, ensuing damages are usually the rule with counterdemonstrations by AFA,” the Secret Service siad.

(Text and translation from Dutch Andreas F. / Photo above: AFA demonstration in Maastricht 2009 / Translation into English: Anders Denken)

(Commentary by Frank Furter)

Package bombs at the Chancellor’s office – that truly is a remarkable means and way to express thanks for billions of German taxpayer money. In fact, the procedure by the senders from the leftwing Greek sector was in itself so foolish and absurd that one would be inclined to ask whether these powers spent a significant amount of their life under the enriching influence of Islamic hate preachers. In any case, it can be suggested that the bombs in this case were of better quality. For in dealing with terrorism, Europe is a developing land. National bankruptcy? What a joke! Look at Afghanistan, Pakistan or Iraq: civil wars, assassinations, massacres and plunderings. A Greek anarchist just has to explode for jealousy.

But no worry. The European Left is on the advance. Today Greece, tomorrow the whole continent. In fact, the question is increasingly being asked in connection with globalization, in which direction this process has really gone. Has the world become more peaceful and in better condition during the past decade? Has it become more like us who were once leading nations in the West? Or are we threatened by the opposite, that these grievances that are present everywhere else will gain influence here at home because of globalization.

The truth apparently lies somewhere in the middle, as is often the case. Thus it fits the picture pretty well when, for example, today the report was spread by the news agencies that China’s head of state Hu Jintao has displaced US President Barack Obama as the most powerful man in the world. Even the harshest critics of Obama can be pleased: a socialist dictator as the most powerful man in the world. Isn’t that just the horror scenario believed by the West, that it was hampered by the fall of the Soviet Union?

No way! Indeed the suggestion can be made that the producers of the Forbes attach more significance to the economic factors they use in the creation of their rankings than they do, for example, to military factors. And, thank God, the US are still as ever the uncontested world power, and indeed the only one in history that hasn’t abusively applied their power in the attempt to subject the rest of mankind – a circumstance that is gladly pushed aside when haters of the West blather on about evil American imperialism. But that doesn’t change the foreseeable trend any: 20 years after the fall of Communism they are experiencing that heresy on which the rogue states of the past century have been erected, a scary renaissance.

And in the shadow of the moderate agents of socialist thought, their extremist brethren in the faith are running rampant and are recently finding themselves “on the threshold of a new leftwing terrorism.” Such is the headline of a notable Welt-Online article by Günther Lachmann who uses the package bomb at the Chancellor’s office as an occasion to cast a more precise look at the extreme leftwing scene in Europe.

It still isn’t clear who sent the package bomb to the Chancellor’s office. Since it was posted from Greece, security groups suspect those leftwing extremists that were also held responsible for the letter bombs sent to various embassies in Athens. The police arrested several suspects.

Their motivation is nourished by an opinion increasingly critical of Europe and capitalism in Greek society in which the consequences have been a decaying attitude toward Germany. Angela Merkel’s recommendation that the EU in the future should retract the voting rights of highly endebted deficit offenders like Greece led to violent reactions. The ranking “leftwing” daily newspaper “To Ethnos” headlined, “Merkel is turning the EU into Dachau.” The paper called the recommendation “scary” and called for “the nations of Europe” to stand up against the “Germans of the Fourth Reich.”

This shows how heated up the debate is in Greece, and “gives a foretaste of the emotions that the subject stirs up in the ranks of the leftwing extremists.” In fact, one would be inclined as an exception in this place to wish for just a little bit more political correctness from those by whom the people of this country are already overburdened by inflation. Finally, terms like “Dachau” and “Fourth Reich” are, in this context, not only stupid and unsuitable, rather also simply and poignantly insulting to a country that on the other side has already most apparently felt this way enough to make its taxpayer money available for the remediation of the squandered Greek economy.

Such a view, however, would require a feeling for economic temperance that apparently has gotten lost by agents of popular media. If such tones, however, are already being struck there, what can the attitude among the people now be – above all among the extreme agents themselves?

Perhaps Greece is simply a step ahead of us in that direction. After all, that country already has it bankruptcy behind it – ours ist still before us, if the exploding social apparatus and the overwhelming debt aren’t soon battled with seriousness. That suggests that the “civil warlike circumstances” that Udo Ulfkotte described in his book “Warning, Civil War” in 2009 could enter the picture sooner than many here consider possible. For at the beginning of an increase in political extremism there is all too often a loss of wealth with concomitant deficits in education – that furthermore hasten the loss of wealth, which then likewise increase the deficts in education. A downward spiral in which our country – as we have known only since Sarrazin – has been caught for a long time.

And just this spiral is increasing noticeably as well as the constant influx of political extremists. From the circumstances in the Muslim world themselves, one can deduce that radicalism and terrorism are more strongly represented the poorer the region involved becomes. In fact, Islam itself stimulates the portrayed spiral not only with a multitude of hate-filled and fascist ideology, but also with a veritable God-appointed aversion to education; presumably a deciding reason why terrorism not only increases on Muslim fertile soil, but it proliferates even when someone has hardly sown the seeds for it.

Even the people of the West are not completely free of such insane ways of thought and action. IRA and ETA might still be local occurrences that are difficult to explain (from without) and which are founded in the regional history. However, leftwing terror, as Germany, for example, has experienced since the end of the 1960s and even into the 80s, was in many respects of a similar type throughout as that of the fundamentalist Muslims: at the core are the crazy and – objectively speaking – ludicrous belief of being agents of the only true worldview on earth, inspired with the commission of blessing all of mankind with the gift of the perfect society – whatever the cost.

This commission, which is tantamount to an elementary blinding of worldview, unites those leftwing extremists – not just with Muslims, but with everone whose hate is oriented against the fundamental order of peace and democracy that the West has developed. No wonder, therefore, when Günther Lachman describes in the following section with whom and what is done as common cause among extremists these days.

“The world has changed, and extremism has adapted to it” Moreau wrote in 2004. Back then he was referring to an “antimperialist congress” that was in session in Italian Assisi that visualizes very well the international networking of militant leftwing extremists. “Not only militant leftwing extremists of any thinkable orientation are meeting there – from Maoists to Trotzkyites all the way to anarchists, just to name a few,” as Moreau said. “There are also supporters of the armed resistance in Iraq and in Palestine, Islamic fundamentalists, extreme rightwing negationists (deniers of the Holocaust) and ultimately violence-oriented opponents of globalism.” This mixture itself appears rather surprising to him, but it encompasses the future geography of leftwing extremism. “It is allied with all extremist currents under the banner of anti-Americanism, of anti-Zionism and antiimperialism, or it seeks political allies among them,” Moreau writes. As a result of this international networking, for example, those like the Greek communists or perhaps the Italian “Rifondaziona Comunista” are also active in Germany. Contact is kept over the Internet with others.

This new leftwing extremism is carried on by a new intellectual process of reflection. The demise of the communist bloc was “noticeably stomached.” “An analysis of the world and its order is in process (…) The exchange of ideas, texts and criticisms happen very quickly, since the translations are undertaken by engaged members and sympathizers,” Moreau wrote, not even imagining that just a short while later the financial crisis would break out over the world, and thus the resurrection of revolutionary-Marxist ideas would roll out the red carpet.

Even more startling that the observations of Moreau cited here have become somewhat passé, and the “financial crisis” of today is even more alarming. Thus, the “capitalism” of the West, therefore, and its great crisis is becoming fire rescue for the restrengthening of those political ideologies, against whose real and existential image the economic crises here appear as heydays.

Especially noteworthy in this context is the fact that those very crises had their origin long ago not just in capitalist greed and economic failure. Thus, for example, US Democrat Bill Clinton stood at the beginning of subprime the “Community Reinvestment Act” whose noble sociopolitical object it was to finance the home of every American; if necessary, on credit. This sociopolitical doctrine was proced by national banks and financers of construction – indeed everything else was typical capitalistic forms of enterprise. The situation in Greece presented itself more blatantly where the benefits guaranteed by the State were never in a proper proportion with economic net product throughout the years. In fact, the crisis, upon closer look, was not a bank, financial or capitalism crisis; at its core it was primarily a crisis of debt, and social policy was often the source of that debt.

The societies of the West, above all the social market economy of the Federal Republic, are not purely capitalistic, as leftwing extremist circles like to portray. Recently, they have been a mixed form in the constant search for balance. And in a crazy way, it is primarily the social elements of Western national structures that produce counterproductive incentives, and that ultimately promote economic and intellectual impoverishment.

It is now five before midnight! The package bomb at the Chancellor’s office was not just a warning that the the standards of security need to be considered. It was also a warning that the future of this country needs consideration. It demonstrates where this political journey is headed, if the people of this country should be fundamentally threatened by poverty. For the greater the loss of wealth in our society, the stronger the throng toward political extremists of any color will be. If it would come to a collapse on the level of the Greek collapse, there would be nobody in the EU who could stand in the gap with their taxpayer billions. In contrast, such a scenario could be the beginning point for a new chapter in history – presumably a gloomy one.

For the allure of the “revolutionary-Marxist” idea has the potential to become the “Islam of the West.” There will be no God or Allah necessary for this; all that will be necessary is intellectual and material poverty, then the self appointed prophets, liberators and revolutionaries will appear all by themselves.

(Photo above: The presumed members of the “Cell of Fire,” from left to right: Alexandros Mitrousis, Michael Nikolopoulos, Gergios Karagiannidis, Georgios Nikolopoulos, Ntamiano Bolano / Translation: Anders Denken)

(Commentary about the US elections by Joachim Steinhöfel / Translation: Anders Denken)

Shortly before that, in the scope of the presidential election campaigns, the Americans met Obama for the very first time. A former social worker, then junior Senator from Illinois, with an interesting personal history, rhetorical talent and totally unencumbered by any kind of legislative or other résumé.

“As a result, he was canonized as a saint and elected President,” said Bret Stephens of the Wall Street Journal.

Yesterday (Nov. 3), the Americans voted. And at the core of the election was one issue: Obama himself. And the message could not have been more clearly stated. Never before in their recent history had Americans positioned themselves in such a devastating fashion against their president and his party as they did yesterday. The loss of 30 seats alone in the House of Representatives is seen as an earthquake. According to the last counts, the Democrats lost 60. There hasn’t been such a devastating vote since 1948.

Even independent voters positioned themselves with unmatched vehemence against the Democrats whom they helped into power back in 2006 and 2008 at the end of the Bush years. There was a clear rejection of the economy-strangling trio comprised of Stimulus, Cap and Trade and Obama’s bureaucratic monster of Health Care Reform (Obamacare).

In exit polls at voting precincts, nearly half of all voters (48%) indicated that Congress should rescind Obamacare. These voters cast their votes 9 to 1 for the Republicans. 56% of the voters said the government was doing too many things, and that the economy would be better left to the citizens. So much for Obama’s desire to be a reverse Reagan and of creating a the reputation of government-above-all. Nobody since Lyndon B. Johnson has increased the influence of government as much as Obama has. And nobody since 1948 has received so much rejection for their position.

More on steinhoefel.de…

TRANSLATION:

On Monday a week ago (Oct. 25), Obama did an inteview with the Latino network Univision, and scolded the viewers who decided not to vote and said instead, “We will punish our enemies and reward our friends with whom we share positions that are important to us.” Our enemies. The true face of a figurehead. The great savior that transcends parties called the Latinos to get revenge on their enemies. So says this messiah who refuses to refuses to use the use the words of the Islamic Mullahs that call for more stonings and the killing of American soldiers in Iraq.

“Thus ends the great non-partisan, race-neutral, ‘new policy’ presidency. Not with a bang and not with a wimper. Rather with a desperate call to ethnic revenge on the eve of an election.” — Charles Krauthammer.

Obama stood far left of the American mainstream from the beginning. His voting activity, his political associations made this readily understandable for anyone. But in this unique summer of 2008, in which America and the world found themselves in a dreamy mass hypnosis, nobody wanted to recognize or hear such things.

Obama is conceited, narcisistic beyond all measure and incapable of handling criticism or any dissident opinion. Therefore, it is doubtful whether he really gets the message sent to him by the voters, just as how Clinton could navigate to the center after the epochal Democratic defeat of 1994. For the most part, Obama knows this better. However it is questionable whether the Democrats who have have rested on this pied piper will follow him any farther if their careers are put on the line on the local, state or national level in 2012.

Those who are “to be blamed” in this democratic election – more than ever among the German legacy of the “modern camera” such as “heute-journal,” “tagesschau,” “tagesthemen” or “Spiegel Online” – are the “extremists, racists, rightwing dissidents and the rightwing populists” from the Tea Party. Therefore, several million Americans, among whom some even voted for Obama two years before. The class of “journalists” that the Tea Party is now denouncing are the ones who before were not so outspoken about Jeremiah Wright, William Ayers, Van Jones or Anita Dunn.

American voters make mistakes. And hardly any of thes had such an effect as the one of 2008. But in their wisdom, they are correcting this one quickly for all intents and purposes. The license was taken away from the ideological Left yesterday (Nov. 3).

However, it is also clear that the Republicans must recognize that it wasn’t they who won this election, rather it was Obama who lost it.

In the coming days, this means that we must be courageous so as to overcome the confusing, untrue and overwhelmingly ideologically drugged din of the German (Americans could put ‘American’ here) mass media, who will be primarily concentrated on parroting the talking points of the Democratic Party machine in a believable fashion.

© Joachim Nikolaus Steinhöfel 2010

The Süddeutsche reports:

The SPD Party head Sigmar Gabriel has announced that he will examine the new, controversial book from SPD politician and Bundesbank committee member Thilo Sarrazin. He will check to see if Sarrazin makes character judgments about foreigners in his book. ‘If he did that, then it is certainly racist,’ Gabriel said in Worms. As far as expulsion proceedings by the party, Gabriel didn’t want to state any details. Such a decision has to be able to stand up in court. In his book on the subject of integration, the former Berlin Finance Senator Sarrazin charges many immigrants of not intending to integrate into German society and bring more expenses than benefits.

In Spring he said that Arabs and Turks had ‘no productive function other than for the fruit and vegetable trade.’

Bet Dr. Christian Pfeiffer gets a well remunerated commission very soon…

BILD Series on the new Sarazin book “Germany is Dismantling Itself”:

» Every pupil should wear a uniform!
» We’re becoming foreigners in our own country
» Germany is becoming more impoverished and stupid!
» Why Islam makes integration so difficult

(Hat Tip: M.S. / Translation: Anders Denken)

“Junge Freiheit” (Young Freedom) reports:

Hopeless Battle Against Wikipedia

The “Outraged Citizens” (Bürger in Wut) group is upset at Wikipedia. At the online-encyclopedia site, until last week, there was a statement about the nationwide voter coalition stating they were “right-wing populist.” The “Outraged Citizens” do not agree with this evaluation.

In addition, they reject the statement in the Wikipedia article that the group arose from the Schill party. This couldn’t be, since “Outraged Citizens” had already been founded in 2004, however, the Schill party dissolved only in 2007. The voter alliance, therefore, is calling for an appropriate change in the Wikipedia article. But this will only happen with difficulty.

Basically, any user of Wikipedia can put together articles and change texts. Thus, even “Outraged Citizens” have started to try and change the article according to their ideas. The new version, however, was reformulated an hour later back to its original version by another author — a common and often criticized practice with Wikipedia.

The approach on the discussion page at Wikipedia about the BIW article is, in fact, incredible. It seems especially important to Wikipedia author ‘häuslebauer’ to press the stamp of “right-wing populist” on various political groups…

It appears important to that populist practice be recognized and shut down.

Let’s look and see what the “populist” future has in store for us…

Rationally speaking, one could say that the utopian, unbased left-wing have lost a spiritual leader. We remember that it was the left-wing MSM that fueled the flames when patriotism, national flags or national language were mentioned as intelligent aids for integration. Today, the same papers in condescending arrogance sell neo-conservative concepts as successful multi-culti assimilation. No problem — we already know where it originated. Neo-conservative thinkers entertain themselves in keeping right with the good conscience against an overpowering armada of left-wing journalists and politicians, and having presented the better concepts of society. Please!

However, in the head of a left-wing individual, this has long since not been reason enough to put his approaches on the testing bench. He also cannot. The Left has long since worked this way: The others have created something new, and the Left has then sold it as his own brainchild, or catastrophically distorted it. Intellectual copyright? That alone shows the incompleteness of the Left’s concept of thought. Ignorance is bliss. Therefore, the Left holds tightly onto its course of appeasement for Islam, while it’s the new-conservative thinkers that (attempt to) maintain Western societies and (attempt to) liberate the people within the Islamic sphere of influence. Just as a ’68 revolution against Capital was possible only inside the confines of a capitalistic state of prosperity, so the next experiment of the Left, of giving Islamic monoculture the label of multi-culti, is again possible only within the confines of neo-conservative societal order because of the massive possibility of collapse. It totally appears as though the Left is entertained by this, that it is a bully based on a robustly new-conservative foundation.

How pathological this Left worldview is in the meantime; the purely perverse reporting of the death and burial of the terrorst Fadlallah through the editorial being carried out by the left-wing ideologues and Islamofascists of the mass media (for example, BBC: “Fadlallah was an important man,” for whom? For the victims of the the assassin from Hezbollah?) Muslim Octavia Nasr is an emblem of this idiocy and its accompanying clique. Nasr is deified by a world of do-gooders not having a working knowledge of cultures, and has been heaped upon with accolades. In this the patrons hope for a blessing from the god of egotism. The spraying of a hint of “pseudo-holy Islamic monoculture/multi-culti” serves only as an appeasement for their own psychological shortcomings coming from a lack of genuine culture. After all, one builds only on the intellectual foundation of another. However, since CNN woman Nasr wears no head scarf, this allows the (secret) left-wing propensity toward the collectivistic totalitarianism of Islam for its own egotistical self-adulation to be well hidden. At least from the masses of their own dumbed down clientele.

It is only stupid that Mrs. Nasr apparently laid down an early start as regards the public disclosure of her radical Islamic persuasion. She doesn’t worship the left-wing synchretic ego-god, rather Allah, and thereby she commits a capital crime against her multi-culti promoters

On her Twitter account octavianasrCNN, Nasr has it reported after the announcement of the death of the Islamic stringpuller for terror (see picture), that she is “sad” about the passing away of the sacred Hezbollah leader. He was “one of the giants of Hezbollah whom they respected greatly”… Put it together: “Moderate Muslim” who is fostered by the Left intelligentsia, “respected” an Islamofascist terrorist? Moderate Islam + Left = Terror?

Honoring Fadlallah is no sign of advance, independent thought or a substantial distinction. Praising Fadlallah simply shows that mainstram Islam cannot be distinguished from “Islamic terrorists” in its strategic goals either. Just as mass murder by the terrorists is indeed rejected (merely) by the cultural Muslim on tactical grounds because it could shake up the masses in the West and it incidentally affects Muslims, so also the public disclosure of individual radical Islamic beliefs held by the Muslims is for the most part held back in editorial bureaus or given in a well packaged admission (“I am against terrorism!”). It is possible this way to put the achievements of Islam in the West in danger due to carelessness in. Ayaan Hirsi Ali calls these radicals the undercover Islamofacists, like “showcase moderate” Tariq Ramadan is also one, for an example. The goal remains the same for the bulk of the Muslims: The West has to become an autocratic Sharia society. Such is demanded in Islamic writings, in Islam.

In closing, we would therefore like to delight the Left of Europe with a truism: Only because something is new, different or “foreign” doesn’t mean it is positive per se for the coheision of a society. In reference to Islam, we would suggest to you with wise foresight that you separate from your Islamic and left-wing hate preachers and terrorist admirers. Then they could in a few years sell it as “their” success and “their” world view… Paying homage to terrorists is not progressive, it is only naive, stupid or otherwise calculated intention. Something like that should have been learned from characteristic socialist history with Stalin or Che Guevarra, don’t you think?

CNN, by the way, has fired Octavia Nasr.

(Guest Contribution by die Realität)

In Hamburg left-wing extremists demonstrated in usual peaceful fashion against “police violence” and the State that supports them. That couldn’t occur without injured police officers. The Hamburger Morgenpost reports:

Unidentified individuals attacked the assignment forces with fireworks and bottles, set garbage bags on fire and smashed through the glass of the Hamburg Sparkasse bank. The police believe that the attackers come from the left-wing scene.

Twelve police officers were hit and injured. Three others were injured by flue gas. The police arrested two rioters under preliminary suspicion of vandalism. Four other people were taken into custody. Only in the early morning hours did the situation calm down around the “Rote Flora.”

With that, the demonstration against police violence and State repression began to proceed peacefully overall. Around 800 participants were present until around 5:30 p.m. marching from the Landing bridges in the direction of Sternschanze.

And by the same token, we are astonished how the Journalists of Quality at the Morgenpost and the police experts even had the suspicion that the matter could have been an event by left-wingers. Who would have thought of that!

(Hat Tip to Thomas D. / Translation: Anders Denken)

(By the Editrix)

His babblings about the Jewish perpetrators of Stalinism who had been no real Jews because they didn’t believe in God, and the Nazis who didn’t believe in God, so the Germans were no “people of perpetrators” either, revealed more about the state of the nation than about him or the Holocaust. Nobody laughed, instead, he was expelled from his parlamentiary group and later stripped of his party membership as well. All of Germany was split in two factions. One thought that he was quite right and that the Jews get away with everything, the rest felt noble.

Things were a bit different, when Annette Groth and Inge Höger, two German Bundestag backbenchers from the post-Stalinist Left party joined the recent terrorist-aid convoi to Gaza. It was, after all, about Jews who are still alive.

Being safely home and dutifully fussed over, they were eager to convey their message. “We have a moral and Christian commitment to speak out aloud against any sort of human rights violations,” said Groth, who used to work for ecumenical institutions and an organisation linked to the Evangelical Church in Germany (EKD), Germany’s main Protestant umbrella, before becoming a member of the Bundestag.

Groth said she had been on the women’s deck (sic!) of the Mavi Marmara, having joined the Muslim women for their morning prayers (sic!) as every good Protestant Christian ought to, when Israeli special forces attacked. “There were soldiers everywhere, heavily armed and pointing their guns at us,” she said. “There was an attitude of terror and humiliation. They did not allow old men to go to the toilet … It was mere terror, creating a situation full of anxiety.”

Her colleague Höger said the women on the ship were quickly (sic!) shut in at a lower level of the ship, the so-called “women’s deck” (sic!) during the night and that they “… couldn’t get out, we didn’t know what was going on above because we were locked in,” she said. “We put on our life vests and eventually we figured out that the ship was occupied, that the Israelis had taken it over”, which doesn’t quite go together with Groth’s vivid description of heavily armed soldiers everywhere who pointed their guns at them and didn’t allow old men to go to the toilet, but whatever.

Different from Hohmann, who had been torn to shreds seven years ago, there was a fussing and clucking and general “there there I can relate yo you” over the two “visibly shaken” victims of Israeli savagery all through the media, because — did I say this already? — this was about Jews who are not yet dead.

There is a petition online to have the Stalin-sisters expelled from the Bundestag with, while I am writing this, 1820 signatures. Will it bring about anything? No, but I signed nevertheless because I thought everybody who got his knickers in a knot over Martin Hohmann seven years ago is somewhat morally obliged to do so.

In the meantime, the German mainstream is eagerly awaiting that the poor, beleaguered Pals and their assorted cronies in the Middle East will finish what had to be cut short 65 years ago in Europe, so that they can go on standing in firm solidarity side by side, upright, solemn and serious, with dead Jews again.

The blogkeepers from the ranks of the apologetics scene are no longer enough. But the statements thus aren’ t any more competent than before, rather they keep the same vagueness, or are kept vague, in order to support the idea of supposed racism. In the headline, Cigdem Akyol already makes it clear: One is only capable of thinking, if the result of the process necessary for doing so is the same as the one the author has come to. This is a traditional practice with the Left, who likes to put “deviants” in lunatic asylums. For whoever doesn’t think the same as we do is either stupid and/or crazy. The kinds of errors in thinking that can be made as deemed by the left-wing powers remain unclear in the context of the article.

And thus, the idea that “critical Islam scholars” have also turned against “this” criticism ends up getting lost in vagueness:

Critical Islam scholars like Ursula Spuler-Stegeman are surprised at how heated the debate has become about Muslims in Germany. Spuler-Stegemann is recognized for her harsh criticism of Islamic associations, however she warns against the populist actions because of fears. “Being critical is OK, but this exaggerating of the situation, it just can’t be.”

Unfortunately, the reader is left alone guess what Mrs. Spuler-Stegeman means by criticism and “this (?!) exaggeration of the situation.” It should be assumed that she means any group that is mentioned by critics, and even the content of their criticism as well. Or did the author possibly put the stamp “Approved by Islam Critics” on her whole article by one of these unintended amplifications here?

We would like to deal primarily with the assertions of the article with relation to PI!

Just one word about the outrage stated in the taz article concerning the approach of the Cititizen Movement Pax Europa to the incompatibility of Islam in letting itself to be tested in court by the constitutional values of a peace-loving democratic society. On the one hand, this outrage is already unfathomable, since this appears to be a discussion in harmony with rule of law. On the other hand, it would already serve to complete the picture by mentioning that the “World Week” already dealt with this very theme a few days before, and introduced Islam scholar Lukas Wick’s dissertation. In his dissertation, e finds “precious few criteria” for the above-mentioned compatibility, and for the ability of Muslims in integrating with a constitutionally ordered state. Incitement? Racism? What the taz author thinks about this doesn’t get disclosed. Thus, she remains in the company of her universally recognized experts.

Of course, Mathias Rohe, who feels he has been pilloried by PI, is certainly not to be missing from this group. It’s possible that Rohe feels this way when Nassim ben Iman asks himself in an interview with PI from where Rohe got his apologetic thesis that the Quran is to be read historically. Rohe is also not asked by the taz author why he isn’t defending his assertion in the discussion. But since that’s not to his liking, he would rather complain to taz about his alleged agitators. But one should show sympathy for that because at the taz it has been decided that no critical questions are to be asked dealing with the uniqueness of “Islam expert” Rohe’s thesis (see interview starting at 8:40).

Unfortunately, neither Nassim ben Iman nor the taz reader can gather from the article where Rohe draws his crude theories, and therefore one has to accept that he relies on his own isolated opinion — as some jurists do — in some aspects of his lectures and presentations. He also understands how to do this rather creatively, as if the agent of this opinion would
a) propagate all his theses in the Islamic World b) and as if he were one of many agents. This he achieves by constantly invoking “for example…” in the course of his lecture. After all, he is aware of his function. Concerned individuals come to him WANTING to be informed that Islam means peace so that they can once again sleep well. Thus, in the respective lecture, his catalog of problems with Islam has the effect of objectivity. But he returns very quickly to the point that Euro-Islam is right at the door. And that is just about as true as it would be with Santa Claus.

“Islamism expert” Claudia Dantschke determines the feeling of “Islamism hostility” with connection to the increase in the number of “PI Action Groups.” Whether the “Islam expert” can really say something about the subject of Islam is questionable, since Islam and Islamism have no real points of connection. But Mrs. Dantschke doesn’t seem to be so ceartain about this. According to Wikipedia, she calls Islamism a religious ideology in her essays. Perhaps “one” might ask, could it be possible that hostility to Islam is directed against a religious ideology rooted in Islam? And this “one” apparently doesn’t buy into the taz author’s ideas.

However, in all seriousness, one has to credit taz for the fact that these individuals — even Dantschke — are dedidicating more and more critical time to the worst excesses of Islam. However, they refuse to take the step of recognizing that these excesses themselves are rooted in Islam, and that the difference between Islam and Islamism is only an artificial one. This is also true when someone — like PI — recognizes that there are Muslims who simply have a mystical approach to their religion or are simply Muslim on paper. In the conclusion of Nassim Ben Iman, it remains that the Muslims spreading terror are exercising their faith from A to Z. The constantly invoked expression, “abuse” of Islam, which thankfully isn’t used in this article, is a chameleon. See Nassim Ben Iman regarding this aspect right here (after 1:00 min).

Yet, a discussion about the content of the criticism cannot be found in this article. Otherwise it wouldn’t be so easy to push all the differing opinons from taz’s into the corner of right-wing extremism.

And of course, Edathy, in his demand that PI be watched for Constitutional Protection, should not be excluded from this group. Since Edathy — in accordance with his basic attitude about policy — wishes to hand everything to the State, including political debate. We recommend a look at this text and the videos corresponding to it here in which a demonstration by the “League for Freedom of Thought” is shown where “We don’t want any Christian pigs” is being chanted. It could be a conviction, considering his desire for balance, that a letter of complaint should be filed and the demand made for surveillance under Constitutional Protection. But possibly, Mr. Edathy — as well as PI — looks at this as a indication of a free society when somebody is allowed to desecrate a crucifix with something like a multiple-headed phallus. Nobody has to like it, but in a free society, one must live with such things. Or is it the case in a certain religion that this Constitution is somewhat invalid? Let us take a guess, Mr. Edathy, one has to differentiate, right? (We hope, Mr. Edathy, that you have not somewhat overlooked the articles at your obviously zealous PI lectures?! We had hoped for your outrage.)

And because Edathy and taz are in agreement that they are the ones to determine who should be allowed to speak out about a societal question, they get upset when not everyone sees it their way. Thus they find it completely monstrous when citizens in fact do join in a debate. What would we come to, if the Sovereign would also join in the political discussions of this country? They would have to be totally and completely involved in financing of billions for the Euro-Misery that they have never been able to inquire about.

So that there are no misunderstandings: every thought about, moreover, every actual threat, act of violence or suppression of debate will be most harshly rejected on the side of PI. Such a debate can only happen in an atmosphere totally free of fear. It is only sad that the Religion of Peace™, with over 14,000 attacks since September 11, 2001, doesn’t contribute to this debate. Therefore, it is especially regrettable that some Islam critics — especially when they are also still apostates — must fear for their lives in palpable measure. But we cannot forget: It is clear once and for all, with the murder of the Egyptian woman Marwa El Sharbini, from whom the danger truly originates. How simple, though, the world is. At least for those who assume that nobody besides them is capable of thinking.

(By the Editrix / Big hat tip: Rainer Bonhorst)

(By Yorck Tomkyle / Translation: Anders Denken)

I see, one says to himself. From an occupying regime occupied by one man at the top, who has at least 20 million people on his conscience, a system is called to life that robbed hundreds of thousands of their possessions, tens of thousands were imprisoned for political reasons and some tortured, a system that had more than 1,000 people shot simply because they wanted to leave the country, and that locked all residents behind barbed wire to keep them in, simply because there was no other reason to do so.

A system that installs the most effective monitoring apparatus in the world for for spying on its citizens. A system that satisfied a great part of its hunger for currency by the sale of its detained citizens. A system that viewed itself during its existence as part of the ideological and intellectual tradition of the second worst mass-murderer in world history (see above). This system, therefore, is not supposed to be a system of injustice. Who are really the ones making this assertion?

Is it a certain Gysi, who as Stysi (var. of Stasi) laid the foundation for this system and profited from it; who only wishes to know now about mountains of records? Perhaps, a certain Wagenknecht, who is now sits on any talk show and makes herself electable for the people by means of our Media of Quality, even though she is an avowed Stalinist (“Stalin did what was politically necessary”) and friend of caviar? And a few old West German communists who were kept afloat with Stasi funds, and thus having been unfettered from their retirement wouldn’t now bite the hand that once fed them? Those are the same dubious types with loads of skeletons in their closets who wish to whitewash the Nazis in the young, post-WWII German Federal Republic. Back then, it initially worked pretty well, until the whole thing finally imploded.

After seeing the SED-Left Party courted so zealously by their supporters in the Media of Quality, an honest person shouldn’t expect the true profession of dictatorship and mass murders to be announced in this same media. Therefore, we will take over that for them. We will demand very clearly that a dictatorship having such a contempt for human beings should be named as such, so that there is finally an end to the hypocritical relativism and to the use of Nazi horrors for the propagandistic embellishments of their own misanthropic ideology.

Whoever doesn’t brand the SED dictatorship as an unlawful regime is a hypocrite if he does describe the Third Reich as one, because to him it has nothing to do with condemning totalitarianism, rather it is simply another ideology. Such types would seek to reestablish such conditions once again, if they could. With their ‘no’ to the condemnation of the Stasi regime, this party has once again shown what it really wants: another country. A country with concentration camps, spies, draconian penalties for independent thinkers, and a political caste that drinks the wine it withholds from the people.

What’s piquant in this whole process is that it really has nothing to do with the the subject itself, for large sections of the Greens and SPD really do see it the same way as the SED successors. But Greens from the east, especially, have many more party members in their ranks who recruit from the GDR resistance movement. A merger with those who deny the State of Lawlessness would therefore put the party before a crucial internal test for which it (still) has not matured enough. However, this problem may be demographically solved within time.

Just as the impotence of the Sovereign (the people) has been seen in the past months in the face of the cold-hearted decisions of the political class, one must acknowledge that the way of democracy has, in the sense of the word, been pushed back to at least an authoritarian partial state within the mob-ruled EU Super-State. Will we recognize these warning signs and resist these obvious beginnings this time, or will Germany be savagely torn from its social(ist) dreams yet again.

(Photo, left to right: Hannelore Kraft, SPD – Bärbel Beuermann, Left-Wing – Sylvia Löhrmann, Green)