We find that it took a jury 15 hours to determine the guilt of Mohammad Shafia, his (second?) wife Tooba Yahya, and their son Hamed on four counts of first-degree murder. In Canada, first-degree murder fetches a sentence of life with a chance of parole at 25 years.

Who were the victims? and why?

The answer to the first question: Zainab, Sahar, Geeti, and Rona Amir Mohammad. All women.

The answer to the second question is a little more difficult to make out when looking at mainstream media (MSM) outlets. Readers on the North American continent need to get these three little letters – MSM – fixed in their mind, for the MSM will report what’s happening, but they tend to be selective in which parties they disclose that might be involved in the situation.

Looking at the articles, like in HuffPo, for example, we find that the three sisters, all in their teens, were murdered for defying their family’s rules of discipline regarding dress, whom they might date, with whom they might socialize, and what they would access on the Internet. HuffPo fails to tell us where these disciplinary rules come from.

In the HuffPo Article, however, was no mention of why the (first?) wife was murdered. Could it be that she was childless? This wasn’t in the HuffPo article, but it was in the New York Daily News. Apparently Mr. Shafia married his second wife because his first couldn’t bear children, but he kept both wives. Or, maybe she supported the Western lifestyle that is so despised by the unmentioned, so-called religion, as the prosecutors believed. NY Daily News doesn’t tell us why this Western lifestyle is so hated, either.

HuffPo doesn’t mention Islam at all in connection with these murders. We find the word Islam mentioned only when scrolling down to the comments, which themselves are pretty dicey, and surprisingly still there. They only talk about “family discipline rules.” HuffPo does give a little history of what led up to the murders, though, without stating the driving force behind the rage. So, were these arbitrary rules that this father fashioned just for his family. How is it that there are so many families that adhere to a certain unmentionable religion that have the self-same rules?

NY Daily News does give a little more through the information obtained by wiretap.

CNN took the feminist approach in the last paragraph of the article by attributing it to male sexuality and power and control over the woman’s body.

Interestingly, when scanning the CNN article, other devices of taqiyya (‘deception’ for those who haven’t read through other PI articles yet) can be found in the article. For example, Shafia swore on the Quran and said it doesn’t “condone killing people” to preserve the honor of the family. However, in Islam, many times the Quranic passages are supported by the Hadiths (for those who aren’t familiar with these writings, they are commentaries made by Islamic scholars throughout the centuries after Muhammad’s death), which are also considered dogma by Muslims. A good article to read for a quick introduction can be found at islam-watch.org. Also on the right sidebar of this PI page are good downloadable PDF articles that can give you more information regarding this strange ideology accused of being a religion.

By the way, in the quick scan of MSM (remember MainStream Media) articles, I didn’t find the word ‘Islam’ in any of the articles. They reported the court proceedings, some with more detail, some with less. The truth can be told, but it can also be twisted until there is no way to understand what it really is. Obviously, the western Western media have learned well from their European colleagues.

In Europe, they’ve already been told that such violence has nothing to do with Islam, or Islam is peace. But what has been said in the MSM, and what the complete reality of the matter is can be two totally different things.

Also, did anyone hear that the trial had to be delayed because of a bomb threat? Thanks to Pamela Geller, we are able to obtain this information. Something that wasn’t readily reported about in the M–S–M!

The verdict in the trial? Guilty of four counts of murder. The verdict for the MSM? Guilty of suppressing an important part of the truth.

Previous article about this subject:

» Honor Killings – In Canada?

Posted by Anders Denken

(By Michael Stürzenberger)

Welt Online makes a striking remark under the headline: “Parliament of the Beards – The Islamists now rule”:

The Egyptian parliament has truly never seen so many beards since its founding in 1923 in the British Mandate Authority. More than ten million voters cast their vote for the Muslim Brotherhood – that is 47 percent. Most of them wear suits.

Another 7.5 million Egyptians, or 25 percent, voted for the radical islamic party of the Salafists. They immediately announced that they would have their representatives swear on the Sharia, the theocratic-islamic law. However, the confrontation fails to materialize.

The men in long beards and white robes read the universal oath from the paper well: “I swear by God that I will maintain the integrity of the nation and the Republican system. I will care for the interests of the people. The Constitution and the law, I will respect.” A few radical islamists add the sentence fragment “as long as this does not contradict the laws of God” and thereby earn sharp criticism.

Allah will soon show in Egypt how things go. The Potsdamer Neuesten Nachrichten already reports of a “Tumult in the Egyptian Parliament“:

In the morning, shortly before ten o’clock, the first of 498 newly elected met at the rear entrance of the highly secured dome building, being received with applause and “Allah is great” calls. (…)

Inside the assembly room, the representative roll-call then started with an oath. For three hours, senior chairman Mahmud al-Saqqa had each individual swear, himself a corpulent jurist from the ranks of the liberal Wafd faction, who, in spite of his 81 years doesn’t give the impression that he will put up with contradiction. When ultraconservative attorney Mamduh Ismail of the Salafist Truth Party added to the oath “I swear to maintain the security of the nation and the interest of the people as well as observe the laws and the Constitution,” but on his own impulse he added the words, “unless the laws of God be offended,” the energetic senior chairman made him repeat the oath formula so long that the devout man finally gave up and did without his theocratic oath. He immediately turned the microphone away from other Salafists that followed this example. A request of the devout ones to interrupt the session for midday prayer was mopped aside with annoying gestures.

There were already the first tumults and vociferous verbal battles in the choice for the heads of parliament and his representatives, especially since the factions had agreed last week on the distribution of offices. And thus, the highest post went in the mentioned vote to Saad El-Katatini, former speaker for the Muslim Brotherhood. Representatives became members of the Salafists and the liberal Wadf party, which entered parliament as the third strongest faction. According to the rules of business, the heads of parliament have a strong political position. They determine the agenda; they can stop debate over specific subjects – a power of decision that especially the twelve remaining small opposition factions look upon in concern.

The “Süddeutsche Zeitung” adds:

The election victory of the Islamists on the Nile is official: The Muslim Brotherhood will be the strongest power in the new Egyptian parliament, followed by the radical islamic Salafists. The young revolutionaries from Tahrir are, in contrast, hardly represented – just as little as women and Christians.

The Egyptians voted green. Green is the color of hope and the color of Islam. The voters provided the islamic parties with more than 70 percent of the seats in parliament, coupled with the hope of a social revolution.

The strongest political power is the Muslim Brotherhood: after the official results published on Saturday, the Party of Freedom and Justice, which followed the Muslim Brotherhood, was able to gather 47 percent of the votes. It will be represented in parliament with 235 representatives and has already announced that they will nominate Saad al-Katatni as their general secretary. In addition, they stated that they would improve the health, education and supply systems.

The parties that could be ascribed to the so-called democratic movement came right at 3.4 percent. Islam and democracy – two worlds that couldn’t be more different, are colliding in Egypt. And in Tunisia, Libya, Syria…

(Hat Tip: TheAnti2007, Lepanto)

Posted by byzanz on PI / Translation: Anders Denken

Our newspapers and politicians often lie to themselves, their readers and voters, while some decision or law is exchanged with reality. The Greek government made difficult decisions about austerity measures; which means then that we can again give them money. Or in Turkey, religious freedom is in the law, and that is graded positively by Brussels; nothing more stands in the way of their joining the EU. One never reads about the fact that the Christian cloisters are in reality being cheated out of land and property, and no Catholic could ever become a driver for the governor of the smallest province.

And this affects the whole world. The foul yellow press prints what certain agencies prepare, self-research is too expensive, to troublesome and apparently they also aren’t interesting. Der Spiegel writes a critical article here about the Imam wedding in Turkey. Great! Super! Agreed, but even in this article one gets the impression that everything is copied from articles in other newspapers. And since the Spiegel correspondent in Istanbul doesn’t know Turkish, it apparently comes from the English division of the Hürriyet (newspaper). In any case, everything can be read there. SPIEGEL doesn’t research anything in East Anatolia; that’s too far away and too arduous! In this vein, the totally useless correspondents of taxpayer TV are totally bad with their blah-blah-blah commentaries.

Posted by kewil on PI / Translation: Anders Denken

(From GO)

In the print edition, Angelika Wölk (the name is routine) reports about the well-enough known infirmity of the Catholic church in this region. Marxloh has been hard hit by it. Three to five church buildings are threatened with closings. No wonder when one considers that only 3000 Catholics live in this part of town. As always in such cases those affected are offered something more digestible, only half of the eradication. Say – two buildings should continue to be used, then later the information from the church leaders would be shared regarding the total degree of the devastation; all five are to be closed. The Duisburg Catholics can’t accept this at all; three closings might be reasonably acceptable, but this complete eradication, that goes too far. People chains, bell-ring protest, occupied churches.

Now comes the hour of the medicine man, or better yet, the medicine woman. Author Angelika Wölk reports how exemplary the Muslims are behaving side-by-side with the Catholic remnant in this battle for the local culture. IN a mutual letter to the bishop, they wrote, “We are impressed and we have shared our feelings with him.” Along with this, the reader gets a sense of a broadside “successful integration” that truly isn’t without tensions (like now then, successful or full of tension) but how can it be any other way, thus it goes on in the article, “in this part of the city riddled with social problems.” Both sides, Christians and Muslims, fear in any case that the future will find its place on the side of the stately mosque without a Catholic church.

The report was even announced on the front page in the following way. “Duisburg Muslims battle for Catholic church.” This headline is a slap in the face of persecuted Christians worldwide and a further building block with which the natural sense of the people about this religion is to be walled in.

Of course, PI has already reported in other places about this very thing, however, this infamous keeping of the people in the dark by the WAZ should not be glossed over. Citizens be vigilant, you are being sold the goat as the gardener. How can a mosque that has contact with the Grey Wolves contribute to the general welfare? Pope attacker Mehmet Ali Agca, for example, is a figurehead for the Grey Wolves.

And here is where we come full circle, the article is embarrassing and typical for our situation here in Germany. The real problems are being suppressed, trivialized, spun, distorted. How will our grandchildren ever cope with all the problems?

» Contact: zentralredaktion@waz.de

Guest Contribution on PI / Translation: Anders Denken

An alleged NPD donor list, customers of certain fashion brand and a list (according to tagessau.de) with rightwing extremists from Junge Freiheit (Young Freedom), among whom are people listed who are dead, former interview partners and authors. An example:

Dr. Franz Alt
Zum Keltenring 11
76530 Baden-Baden
07221/31 540
07221/25064
0172/19 42 143
franzalt@t-online.de

Yes, it has to do with the retired, red-Christian Eco-Jesus Franz Alt, whose own lunatic asylum called ARD is now indirectly counted among the “extreme Right” with the Indymedia list at hand! This is how it happens, when leftwing pipe bowls exert their perverted bird brain. In the process, the highly dangerous names – of all things not with address and telephone number – appear for anyone to read in the newspaper. One can only laugh.

However, it is sad when the same schizophrenic yellow press, who since the forestalled census of in the middle of the 80s has pitched a perpetual wail because of egregious breaches of data protection, lets their pseudo-democratic mantle quickly fall when it is an issue of rightwing dissidents. The leftwing Press of Quality can playfully accommodate with any Nazi block leader, and the red socks from the Nazi pocket network in any case. And among the red-colored fascists from Indymedia the headline for the JF list reads “We accept all of you”! Arrested or shot in the head?

Posted by on PI / Translation: Anders Denken

Matthias Heinzel writes the following:

A few days after the murder of a 26-year-old female student, the violent act is now being used for religious and racist propaganda. Several Israeli and German Internet media report that an Arab was the perpetrator and has already been arrested. None of that is the truth, the Göttingen police assures us.

Göttingen. In the version by media outlet Arutz Sheva (Israel), Haolam.de and Eipnews, the reasons behind the murder of the female student sound something like the following: The family of the victim lives in an Arab village in Galilee. The mother of the 26-year-old, though, is a Jew, which according to Jewish belief means that the daughter is a Jew as well. The police suspect this issue and, therefore, suspect a nationalist-ideological motive as cause for the murder, and have already determined a suspect – a citizen from one of Israel’s neighboring Arab countries. Meanwhile, the police have also confirmed that this suspect has already been arrested. Why and with what legitimacy the suspect was staying in Germany is still unknown. Ynetnews, however, reports that the investigators went on the assumption that the 26-year-old was the victim of a sexual assault.

Everything was clearly invented and fabricated, Jasmin Kaatz, speaker for the Göttingen police, says. A political motive for the murder being ruled out at the time. By the way, the murdered 26-year-old was of Muslim faith. Besides that, there is still no indication of a sexual offense. Important indicators in connection with the investigations are the facts that the apartment was not violently broken into, and apparently nothing was stolen or robbed. Furthermore, the Göttingen district attorney also is ruling out xenophobia as a cause.

A [Göttingen] Tageblatt survey with Arutz Sheva regarding the origin of the questionable information remained unanswered. The true reason for the story of the alleged criminal activity of an Arab can actually be better found in the ideological background of the participating media. Arutz Sheva, for example, is an Israeli media network considered to be religious-Zionist and an anti-Arabic mouthpiece for the Israeli settler movement. A whole array of various Internet media, many of them decidedly Israel-friendly, have apparently accepted the information there without any followup research.

Reader Adam Danial Poznanski writes the following splendidly in a comment regarding this Israel bashing:

Even the murder of a female Israeli – on German soil – is being used by the inherently socialist German press for an Israel hunt! This article serves in the smallest way for the information of the reader about the reasons of the murder that is allegedly as good as settled. Of course (!) there is nothing political behind it!! An Arab who murders a half-Jewess with an Israeli passport is generally left out for noble reasons which don’t have to be mentioned by the author. On the other hand, the author sees in this a necessity to go on about the propaganda of Jewish-Israeli media. I DEMAND an immediate STATEMENT OF OPINION from the CHIEF EDITOR!!!

If the victim should in fact be “of Muslim faith,” this could likewise be a motive for murder. The attractive student lived in a civilized and Western fashion.

» E-mail: m.heinzel@goettinger-tageblatt.de

Posted by PI / Translation: Anders Denken

The story is told quickly: The two go cheerfully to the local mosque and wash their hands and feet first according to prescribed guidelines. They then enter the instruction area where they already expect to see their veiled teacher and many head-covered girls sunken deep into the Quran. Everyone is friendly and kind, and of course both of them put a veil over their head and focus on the Quran. Then, at sometime the Quran instruction is over and the two buoyantly leave the mosque. The message to be conveyed to all of the clueless children in front of the television goes: Such a Quran school like this must certainly be cool!

But see for yourself:

» E-mail the NDR (producer of the Sesame Street): ndr@ndr.de

Posted by PI / Translation: Anders Denken

The interview has been published in the meantime, and we don’t want to hold it back from our readers. Of course, the unfair editors – the query came from a Merve Durmus – still had to place a mendacious introduction above it and identify us as leading thinkers of lunatic neonazis without any kind of argument. Otherwise, the interview was reproduced word for word (See translation in English below). There is also a comment area. Too many comments, however, would perhaps exaggerate the value of this medium.

Translation of the interview in German Turkish News (Deutsch Türkische Nachrichten):

German-Turkish News: You write: “A terror that is not perceived as terror is no terror at all.” Do you not believe that nine murdered immigrants have called up feelings of being terrorized among the Turks – perhaps precisely because nobody had any idea where the enemy was located?

Politically Incorrect: No, because the murders were spread out over an extended period of time and several kilometers apart, the last one in 2006. Other than the direct family, everone has long forgotten about it. Besides that, even the Turks didn’t know who it was.

German Turkish News: You write: “What have these leftist NGOs done until now other than discuss things with themselves.” What needs to happen in order to stop extreme rightwing acts of violence?

Politically Incorrect: Nobody knows of a recipe, otherwise it would have been employed. Besides police and justice for deterrence of totally stupid felons of all shades, it would certainly be helpful if politics would not constantly shift to the left. During the times of conservatives like Franz-Josef Strauss (CSU), there weren’t any acts of violence due to hostility against foreigners in Bavaria. But when young people are told every day how stupid and dumb and old-fashioned they are, and that they are scum and nobody asked their opinion, and that they deserve to be exterminated, then some will dig in their heels and fight back against genuine and supposed antagonists.

German Turkish News: You write about the neonazis in Zwickau: “At this point, we have a confused, xenophobic and murderous trio from the precariat.” Do you believe that extreme rightwing thought has something to do with the social environment? Is there also a confused and xenophobic body of thought in increased measure among the parents?”

Politically Incorrect: No, in the precariat, more right thoughts are found than among the upper ten thousand because these people who are the first feel the drawbacks of unbridled immigration. One should house 1000 Rotation Europeans (previously called gypsies) in the new Spiegel high-rise in Hamburg, let’s say for one year. The weekly Spiegel would then be purest joy. Xenophobic way of thought can hardly be found in Germany, in contrast to in Turkey.

German Turkish News: You write: “If everything comes true this way, then a wave of outrage will spread through the country, light chains, memorial services, demos, addresses, debates in state and federal congress, political demands, a ten-fold increase of millions in the “Battle against the Right” and the question of who is responsible for it. For it won’t be long before the leftist-filthy Dumont publisher and tutti quanti happen to stumble completely surprisingly upon PI as the main instigator.”

Politically Incorrect: Are you trying to set a big trap for us? Our answer is totally simple: We hope that as many people as possible, old and young, right- and leftwing radical, conservative and moderate, male and female, Germans and Turks and Arabs, Chinese and Eskimos, Catholics, Hindus and Muslims read PI. The more the better!

German Turkish News: You write: “Therefore, we can luckily say that the series of devious murders played out against eight individuals of Turkish origin and one Greek victim between 2000 and 2006; the last murder was on April 6, 2006. PI, however, was established only on 11/11/2004.” Do you believe that a publication like PI is contributing more to the reduction of violence – because, in a sense, you are offering a release valve by making use of the right to free speech?

Politically Incorrect: Maybe or maybe not. Who can know? Our goal is primarily to correct the reporting of the other media who never report about deficiencies in Islam or in the uncontrolled immigration. We attack the so-called political correctness that we hold to be an evil, but also any other possible areas, be it Euro or Eco!

German Turkish News: You write: “Der SPIEGEL article about PI, (notation DTN) serves only one purpose: To give Constitutional Protection arguments as to why PI should be monitored now.” Are you afraid that the media will now be able to take a new approach in agitating Constitutional Protection against you?

Politically Incorrect: No, we’re not afraid of that because we have nothing to worry about, anyone can read the articles, even Constitutional Protection. We do expect, however, that the red-leaning mass media will pick at us for so long that Constitutional Protection will eventually be weakened and give in, which, of course will make no difference. They can’t ban us. As you perhaps know already, the communist and atheistic Left Party is also being monitored by Constitutional Protection but yet is still sitting with party strength in Congress.

Caption under image in German Turkish News: Members of PI recall the times of the great propagandists when they think about the German media: “The propaganda machinery of Goebbels-like political correctness is running full steam ahead!”. (photo: archive)

Posted on PI by kewil / Translated by Anders Denken

Somehow, the idea floats around in the heads of some here that PI should only be nice and express themselves in a refined fashion like the queen, and then finally they would be accepted by the mainstream media and accepted as a serious partner in the debate. Nothing could be farther from the truth. Our mainstream media, the ruling political science, and the leftwing parties (i.e. Edathy, SPD, communists like SED-Jelpke) would like to spread their ideology uninterrupted and ban, wipe out, isolate and destroy dissident thinkers.

The spiel of leftwing gang after gang is as primitive as it is effective. The ball is thrown back and forth, which the other party picks up and plays it back to the other opponent with renewed drive; the main thing is that the collection of lies continues to swell and influence unsuspecting contemporaries. One fine example is the manipulated discussion for stirring up Constitutional Defense against PI. The concerted effort is summarized here:

The current campaign started with the terrorist Breivik on 7/22/2011. After the initial shock, the search for whom to blam quickly commenced, and the leftwing mob was only too glad to make a direct connection between PI and the mass-murderer. When this didn’t work, the question was disingenuously posed whether it would be possible that also in Germany someone like Breivik might surface, having been stirred up by PI articles, which was thrown to the air with affirmation. On 7/26/2011, the eco-red periodical founded by RAF sympathizers, taz, wrote with concern:

Still unmentioned [in the Constitutional Defense Report 2010] is the central organ for the German enemies of Islam, the blog “Politically Incorrect” (PI). In an intentional stand of defense, PI warns of a self-proclaming religious dictatorship in Germany.” The influential blog is clicked on around 60,000 times each day. 52 “PI groups” around the country are introduced on its homepage.

No doubt, extremely dangerous! Also, on 7/26/11, the same day, Florian Rötzlöffel Rötzer seconded with the same garbage in the pink Telepolis On 8/18/2011, the SED communists made a “little” inquiry with the German federal government under direction from red hairdresser Ulla Jelpke:

Moreover, there is an increasing number of anti-Islamic Internet sites. Where things are often being stirred up in a way that is racist, hostile to foreigners, insulting, filled with hate, and that often promotes violence against people of Muslim faith and Islam, and in general against immigrants from Near- and Middle-East countries.

And further down:

10. How much of the anti-Muslim, racist and violence-encouraging statements does the federal government recognize?

a) Does the federal government consider such expressions of disturbing the public peace and the peaceful cohabitation of people acceptable?

b) How much is the federal government of the persuasion that PI’s confession is distinguished by the Constitution per se as a rightwing orientation compared to that of having a focus contrary to the fundamental order of peace and democracy?

The answer was handed down by the government on 9/2/11, note their conclusion here that anti-Muslim and racist entries were found to be only isolated and in the comment area.

It simply couldn’t be left this way. On 9/12/11, the privately and publically red-leaning hairdresser Jelpke complained on her Internet page that we “don’t show up in brown shirts with Hitler moustaches.” Otherwise her game would have been much easier. Simultaneously – there are coincidences – red aide-de-camp Florian Rötzlöffel Rötzer took up words on 9/12/11 in Telepolis with the information from his bosom buddy Jelpke.

On 9/14/2011, the Dumont press then commenced with their elaborate, song-like campaign with a couple of presumably stolen E-mails or illegally monitored Skype dialogs, blew them up, lied in addition, and portrayed PI as a danger for Germany that should be taken seriously; the only thing missing was the hint of a coup against the state. The article appeared on this day in the Frankfurter Rundschau, the Berliner Zeitung and the Kölner Stadtanzeiger simultaneously (links and commentary here)! One day later came the ready echo from the red-leaning pool of lies, Telepolis.

In the meantime, on 9/17/11 the leftwing Press of the Confederation awakened and began taking shots at a former colleague of PI, a glowing champion and defender of Israel, so that they could shoot her down as a pastor with cruel and devious smears. (This action is still going on.)

On 9/18/11, the rear gun of democracy, der SPIEGEL printed and online, shot its barrel burst. When you compare the texts with the Dumont smears, you’ll notice that there’s nothing new in them, only the same “proofs.” That same day, also on 9/18/11, the Islamic submarine Meli Kiyak served up “her own research” about PI with complete “vulgarity and uninhibited” in the Berliner Zeitung, again the same old rotten stuff.

On 9/26/11, the rear of democracy’s rear gun, the red-leaning, nihilist SPIEGEL was burning, so it plugged together deep psychological analyses of Brevik-PI! One day later, on9/27/11, the barrage of fire from the red-leaning Dumont artillery ensued, Frankfurter Rundschau and Berliner Zeitung appeared with identical articles. The ruminating Geyer intended at all costs to achieve Constitutional Defense monitoring.

After their concoction started to appear as a fad, just two days later, on 9/29/11, they fired their great barrel burst and stated that PI had threatened the secret service. None of that worked, though, for Constitutional Defense would simply not “monitor” PI. On 10/1/11, the leftwing inquiry was flanked once again in the Frankfurter Rundfunk by “Kröver Nacktarsch” Sabine Schiffer.

Anybody who thinks that red nobodies will simply give up have deceived themselves. On 10/31/11, the communist hairdresser Jelpke made another “little” inquiry with the federal government. In this one, the Dumont articles that have meanwhile appeared are named as new evidence, and the government is being asked whether they still maintain that PI is no danger:

We ask the federal government:

1. How much and with what backing does the federal government continue to hold to its assessment found in Bundestag publication 17/6910 with regard to the website Politically Incorrect and other websites and organizations hostile to Islam and Muslims, in light of press reports in the meantime (see previous note)?

Two days ago, on 11/6/11, the rear gun of democracy followed with a rehash. Thus yesterday, on 11/7/11, the second inquiry by the communist Jelpke mentioned above landed in the Bundestag. And so, this has now continued month after month without yielding anything new. Everything simply gets reheated and repackaged. Read whatever you wish, it’s always the same.

Of course, those belonging to the Red Combo are sympathizers such as Antisemitism-Benz who are quoted as authorities, and other informers and secret helpers of the journalists that quote each other mutually, for example, the infamous political blogger Näher and journalist Geyer. They are all on Wiki. The journalists’ smears about PI are collected on leftwing-twisted Wiki as an objective lexicon of truth, and then two weeks later, the erstwhile fabricated web of lies appears in the press as evidence from Wiki. A vicious circulus vitiosus! But the Left is dilligent. Meanwhile, in Wiki there are more footnotes about PI than in the lexicon entry about Jesus Christ!

The photo above shows a panel with a quote from Augstein mounted on the recently inaugurated, new SPIEGEL high-rise in Hamburg. “Tell it like it is!” That has yet to occur with a leftist!

By kewil for PI. Translation by Anders Denken)

20 Minutes writes:

Information available to the editors of 20 Minutes indicates that the young politician of the strict, religious Federal Democratic Union (EDU), Matthias Kim Leng Teh participated in the Facebook posting orgies. In an anti-Islam group, mass postings to the administrators of the liberal Club Helvétique were called for in his name … When addressed about this, Teh answered: “I vehemently reject incitement against other groups or calls for violence.” He couldn’t remember any calls against profiles. And the young politician countered: “Fake profiles and smear campaigns have been carried out against me. Of course I have posted these persons and also called them to post.” The proof against him could originate of a fake profile for the purpose of causing him harm, Teh said. …

Bettina M.* has taken the hate of the Facebook crusaders on. M. has repeatedly stood up in the public group “Can this minaret have more fans than the SVP (Swiss People’s Party)?” against racist slurs. “What amazes me so much is the age of these crusaders,” Bettina M. said, whose Facebook account has been blocked three times due to organized mass postings. “They are women and men in their forties and fifties, parents – and many pass a lot of hours doing this, to unload about me and other unlikeable people, or to post to the profile in order to render us silent.

And now the warrior for the minaret who as the hero against the crusaders allegedly has more fans than the SVP is being portrayed as the discriminated victim.

Matthias Teh fights against the smear campaign with a reply:

I fault the poor and one-sided research of a few journalists in Switzerland. Those who know me even just a little know that I vehemently resist any form of “modern crusading.” Those who incite against people, be it Muslims, Jews, Christians, women, men, etc., have wasted their efforts on me. If I discover a FB friend doing this, I address them about this and delete them immediately off my friends.

I don’t move among primitive groups in which dissident thinkers are called to do postings. I reject unfounded posting by dissidents. I am of the opinion that one cannot rule out an opinion or outlook unless it’s a personal attack below the belt against other persons.

I myself have experienced that somebody in a pro-minaret group (with 50,000 members) called for postings against me. Also, a fake profile of me was posted in which inciteful and racist remarks and reports were made in order to blackball me and to bury me in posts.

I am very disappointed that journalist Oliver Wietlisbach is drawing me along into this public denunciation. The images and names of every person except mine were made unrecognizable. It appears to me that this journalist, whom I don’t personally know, has also set is target on me. To this I ask whether journalists aren’t made aware when targeted people (dissident thinkers) are blackballed. I apparently belong to the wrong political camp.

To the wrong political camp belongs ANYONE who doesn’t extend a welcome to Islam as a new leading culture into the Western world with a kiss of the hand.

» Contact the chief editor: hansi.voigt@20minuten.ch

Here are three such instances – found totaly by accident in research regarding the Berlin subway attack:

In Heidelberg two schoolchildren were brutally attacked by three assailants, threatened with knives and club, beaten, kicked and mugged. The police are searching for the perpetrators with a photofit image, one of which spoke German with a Turkish accent.

In Goeppingen near Stuttgart, an Arabic-speaking man sought out a part-time employment agency – not necessarily in the search for employment, but with a mask and pistol. He forced an employee of the company to hand him money and then fled.

In Dossenheim near Heidelberg back in January, a 29-year-old man was brutally beaten up by two 17-year-olds in a streetcar. He had noticed that the two thugs were provoking another rider and had sat himself next to the man in order to relax the situation. The civil courage then ended up with the two provocateurs letting loose on the helper. First there were slugs to the face, then one of the assailants held fast on the holding rail and kicked with momentum with full force against the chest of the victim. After that they together attacked the injured one calling for help with kicks and punches. When two other men came to the aid of the victim, they left off from him. The police were able to arrest them shortly after debarking from the streetcar and gave them over to the charge of their parents.

(Photo above: Photofit image of one of the three fleeing assailants in Heidelberg)

(From Schalk Golodkowski / Translation: Anders Denken)

The process was worth a three-column report on the first page of the SWP; Patrick Guyton put it together (photo above left):

A few clicks in internet forums give the impression of how much incitement, hate and malice Abu Adam must have endured in the last two and a half months. 80 days long sat the 40-year-old imam who preaches at the Munich mosque in jail.

[…]

Above all because of the sensational reporting by the tabloid press that gave the imam the title of “beating preacher,” the case became the talk of the town in Munich. The “Bild” newspaper protrayed him as an “evil bone breaker” and wrote that he “looks like the mass murderer Osama bin Laden.” Abu Adam has outward resemblances to the terrorist.

For starters it can be assumed that the imam had other things to do other than read internet forums while in jail. It appears more likely, therefore, that Patrick Guyton and the SWP were the ones that suffered from the fact that media and readers put the dignitary of the “untouchable” religion under fire. The SWP would most certainly have liked to have mounted a witch hunt against a Catholic bishop instead.

It isn’t hard to paint the idea for oneself that the SWP would have stood up for the fact that the case leaves other questions open, were the one released not Imam Abu Adam but Bishop Mixa. A peak at their own archives would already have given sufficient reason. Like many other media, the SWP also reported of the arrest of the imam on December 8, 2010:

The 40-year-old imam allegedly locked his wife in the apartment. The 31-year-old coming from Syria spoke no German and therefore turned to an Arabic-speaking attorney by telephone, Bayerische Rundfunk reported. The attorney communicated with the police. Abu Adam wouldn’t allow the officers entry. He had intended that the matter was a private affair that had nothing to do with the authorities. The offers kicked the door in. The woman was brought to the hospital with considerable injuries; the imam was arrested. To make sure that he couldn’t manipulate possible witnesses, an order for his arrest was issued. The imam disputes the action. He supposedly explained to his attorney that his wife received her injuries in an epileptic attack.

In the new article is reported:

His third wife said that a “love hate” relationship had developed between them. On the evening in question it came to punches that were thrown by her, she reported to the district attorney. She had gotten the broken bones in the past because she constantly fell because of an illness. Abu Adam sees himself meanwhile as a victim of “character assassination.”

One would think that a critical journalist would ask why the imam wouldn’t allow the officers to enter and how come the woman was so injured that she had to be brought to the hospital. Furthermore, he would ask what the district attorney ascertained in light of the woman’s broken bones. The thoughtful husband, however, apparently always took her to the doctor with such serious injuries, which would then be on record and would have strongly served as the immediate exoneration of the imam. Or was there hope in the self-healing powers of the body? And if so, under what kind of circumstances did the woman actually live?

Also, the question of whether the woman didn’t possibly make a retraction under pressure is one that a journalist should at least pose. Patrick Guyton prudently prevents another question right away:

His third wife according to Islamic tradition had made serious accusations against him with the police.

Yes, right, Mr. Guyton, when it has to do with the “Islamic tradition,” polygamy is perfectly fine! What about all the nonsense with women’s rights and women’s quotas for which the SWP otherwise has no more breath? Also, in the German legal system, things that are to insignificant shouldn’t be insisted upon. Ultimately, the issue here is Islam, and there other customs and practices are simply the rule. May Allah give you the opportunity sometime to get to know them even better!

» patrickguyton@kabelmail.de

(Commentary by Frank Furter / Translation: Anders Denken)

Normally it is truly one thing to write a bestseller, but a totally different one to put an important political discussion into motion in our country. This year, however, one man has succeeded with effective as well as controversial means to do both.

With these words, which sound somewhat like a praise, Günther Jauch introduces the segment dealing with the bestselling author of the year, Thilo Sarrazin. A short film follows that poignantly brings the development around the book “Deutschland schafft sich ab (Germany Is Abolishing Itself)”: for the one he is a hero, for others an agitator, so it was said.

This short film might not have had substantial depth, but it makes one thing sufficiently clear: much of what has happened on the political floor since summer 2010 would not have been possible without Sarrazin’s book. When arriving in the studio, Sarrazin was greeted with frenetic applause. The airs of jubilation for Daniela Katzenberger who followed might have gotten further out of hand, but after all it was an RTL broadcast as well. Apparently, Sarrazin wasn’t really sure whether he’d be received in a positive way. Even more worth noting was the courage he had to place himself before the public; and even better was the applause for his ill-treated soul.

He looks at the year 2010 with mixed feelings, Sarrazin said to Jauch’s first question. On one side, he’s happy for the successof his book; on the other side “what he has experienced with all this” was not so enjoyable. In the following, Sarrazin corrected Jauch when he said that the number of copies sold came to 1.5 million. That was exaggerated, the ex-banker said, 1.2 million was correct. “Those who also read it have to read through many statistics and many tables,” Jauch expressed, and asked “did you really intend to write not one bestseller?” Sarrazin replied:

No, I didn’t intend that. That was not the plan. I had thought, I’ll write a book about that which has always been on my heart, and I had thought, OK, perhaps 50,000 to 80,000. And the publisher had printed 25,000, found the book too thick, to full of numbers; they intended that I should strike the tables from the book. I said, no, I won’t do that; everything must remain as it is.

And it was even good that way. For if one looks at the original sales projections and juxtaposes them with the number of copies sold, one can comfortably pat Sarrazin on the shoulder and say: there wasn’t one too many tables. The Germans ultimately don’t appear to be so dull as the regular program on RTL would have one believe, and ultimately not so much in the self-hating camp of the Left as one would like to see in the political establishment. That is also an insight for which we have Thilo Sarrazin to thank.

The next segment dealt with the action of expulsion by the party, and Jauch wanted to know which party he would then pick. However, Sarrazin sent him packing with strategic cleverness. An election recommendation for another party would certainly have provided an argument that would fuel the action of expulsion. However, evidence that the parties stick pretty well to their political responsibilities, sometimes more, sometimes less, and at the moment not so well, as Sarrazin didn’t let escape the discussion. And even with this he was correct. Just as he has been so correct the rest of this year.

Sarrazin was also applauded upon leaving. This time, a call of ‘boo’ was mixted in, but if that is all the political Left has to pit against Sarrazin, then the future of our land doesn’t look so bad as one all to often had to think in pre-Sarrazin times.

Also, from Frank Furter and all PI friends: Thank you, Thilo Sarrazin. For us, you are the Man of the Year 2010!

(Video processing: Antivirus)

Welt Online reports:

During a leftwing demonstration in Berlin against an upcoming eviction of an occupied house things came to a massive outbreak of violence. Followers of the unregimented scene thereby injured several people.

The cause for the demonstration was the announced eviction from the house on Leibigstrasse 14 in Friedrichshain. 25 people are living their without a valid tenant agreement.

Several police officers and a journalist were injured when hooded demonstrators dressed in black threw rocks, bottles and fireworks at the officers and passersby. Several of the independent demonstrators also allegedly attempted to blind the officers with laser pointers. “We estimate the injured to be in the double-digit range,” a speaker for the police said.

The police spoke further of a “sudden discharge of violence that was unforeseen.”

The “discharge of violence” was hardly unforeseeable, as will become clear later in the article:

The inhabitants of the house and their supporters had called for weeks for resistance on February 2nd. On the radical leftwing Indymedia Internet site were the words: “Let it crash; let it bang.” Also violent resistance was also signaled indirectly: “We will not rely on registered actions, but be spontaneous, costly and uncontrollable.”

Spontaneous, costly and uncontrollable, there could be no better way to explain the actions of the Left in this country. One could only imagine that it wasn’t leftwingers but rather rightwing idiots who would be to blame for “injuries in the double-digit range.” It would be the main theme in all the media, and the first human chains would already be in planning. But this time it is indeed the illustrious left, and thus the bulk of the media would rather take care of “more important” things, like for example, the Jungle Camp on RTL! If there were yet proof needed for the mass-stultification of the German people, please: his name is Peer Kusmagk, from now on he’ll be called the Jungle King.

Video of Leftwing Terror in Berlin (of course, right in the middle is Ströbele at 2:36 min. who would rather not see anything of violence):

At “Political Post Publish”, political bloggers debate with each other, and the result is pleasingly different from the usual talk show monotony. Actually, an open slot hasn’t been found yet, but the pilot program that showed in October is available online and stirs up the desire for more:

Part 1:

Part 2:

Under the title “Is Germany really eliminating itself?”, Alexander Rackow of cdu-politik.de, Manfred Kleine-Hartlage (author of the book “The System of Jihad” of korrektheiten.com and Michael Kerzel of the liberal buergerclub-deutschland.de about the German immigration policy. The participants debated very professionally and with arguments that one otherwise aren’t brought up in the mainstream media, and they allowed each other to finish speaking. The attempts by the moderator Clemens Kahlke to lead the discussion down the path of political correction remained only that. (Kahlke: “Isn’t it careless to simply wipe away the … achievements of a successful policy of integration with such a statement as ‘Multiculti is dead’?” – Kleine-Hartlage: “What achievements?”)

A talk show where the blogosphere has it’s say, and in which the well trodden paths of the so-called “public discourse” are left behind: That has a future! We hope that it doesn’t just remain an idea, but that TV Berlin will truly one day broadcast this format.

(Photo above, left to right: Manfred Kleine-Hartlage, Alexander Rackow, Clemens Kahlke and Michael Kerzel / Translation: Anders Denken)

Nobody seemed to notice the charade as long as it worked so nicely as the “defense against all evil” in the Battle Against the Right™. However, now the respectable Antisemite stands before a serious conundrum: His whole game of hide and seek threatens to fly away because, of all people, the “rightwing populists” subscribed to scapegoats team up with the Zionist settlers in Judea and Samaria. To stand with credibility against this alliance hardly succeeds without revealing one’s own anti-Jewish resentments.

20 Minuten reports:

Genuine backing looks different. Israel has newly received such backing from an unexpected corner: European legal politicians are vociferously defending Israel’s claim to the occupied territories. …

Geert Wilders, whose rightwing populist and Islam hostile party the Dutch minority government tolerates said on the occasion of his visit in Tel Aviv the beginning of December, “A land that is only 15 kilometers wide cannot be defended. That is the strategic reason why the Jews must settle in West Jordan Land.” That matches the official Israeli position. …

“Our culture is based on Christianity, Judaism and humanism, and the Israelis are fighting our battle. If Jerusalem falls, Amsterdam and New York are next.” In other words: Israel’s battle against the Palestinians is Europe’s battle against Islam. …

The episode didn’t remain an isolated incident. One day after Wilders’ appearance in Tel Aviv, European legal politicians completed a sightseeing tour in West Jordan Land, among whom were Heinz-Christian Strache, the head of the rightwing populist FPÖ (Austrian Free Party) from Austria, as well as Filip Dewinter of the rightwing-nationalist Vlaams Belang (Flemish Interest) party. They also affirmed the Israeli claim on the occupied West Jordan Land.

The constantly forced spin of the left and the mainstream media in this situation is to accuse the Right by saying they have exchanged the demonization of the Jews with that of the Muslims, an assertion that most obviously consistent in foregoing any basis, since the most open Antisemites these days are themselves Muslims, and the leftwing tolerance in the face of their Jew-hating activity reveals their own resentments in this direction.

(Hat Tip: westsouthpark / Translation: Anders Denken)

(By Tangsir / Translation: Anders Denken)

It wasn’t any different, when I made the mistake of watching the talk show ‘Nachtcafé (Night Café) on SWR3. Besides a boring bald-headed retiree named Wieland Backes (during these moments, I ask myself just why such types remaine spared from immigrant violance), three Turks sat in the illustrious round, the Federal Commissioner for Background Immigration Böhmer, Udo Ulfkotte, a female teacher and another German man whose clichés were so repulsive that I won’t mention his hame here.

In this program it was once again the pitiful subject of Turks and Muslims, as though some kind of clarification was really needed from all this. The costs and honoraria of the guests have already been paid by the taxpayer, thus our three Turks, Madam Böhmer and the unnamed German in the round set out to explain to the German people what kind of idiots they really are, and that the problems lie always and only with German policy and society.

Read further on tangsir2569.wordpress.com…

Translated text:

The Successful Immigrant, or How Society Here Is Enhanced

First, Hüseyin Ekici explained to us the failures of German society with relation to the Turks living here, and right away called this the reason for why he has only a secondary school diploma and has not been able to make it to the position of nuclear or quantum physicist like so many Turkish Nobel Prize recipients had accomplished before him in the glorious history of the Ottoman Empire, and later, the Republic of Turkey

“Nobody offered me anything, nobody gave me any hope.”

And moreover, because a German teacher had at one time refused to give him a handshake, and otherwise because one couldn’t build a chummy relationship with the German teachers, our sweet Hüseyin was a total failure in the German school system. Later then, nobody offered him anything on the street and gave him no hope for delving into the criminal way, but our Ekici managed to become a successful little crook anyway. And because German TV has a duty to educate, it is shown here that secondary students like him, that are hardly in the position to formulate a sensible sentence, are able anway to go quite far by becoming actors, for example, on an afternoon series. Only this way can the future capacity of the German economic position be secured, and let’s not forget that Hüseyin’s mama herself personally reconstructed Germany with her own hands. It is a matter of Turkish reconstruction in the second generation. The acting capabilities of our Hüseyin are limited only by how much he can play himself, but we should be thankful for every enhancement from everyday routine on TV and simply not require too much from our Turkish compatriots; from the Turks, the gangsters, the full post that failed in school and makes everyone else responsible for it, only not themselves. It doesn’t matter one bit that Turks in their history have produced not one single scientist or creative artist of rank and significance, no the problems as to why the Turkish Einsteins have not come into their own right, that they haven’t flourished or been able to develop their talents lies simply in German integration policy.

Also, in the Ottoman Empire it was such that the Armenians totally intimidated the Turks by their proficiency and imposition of high taxes, and disturbed them as well with the processing of new mathematical approaches and solutions in cryptography and cybernetics. Ultimately, however, the Turks found the the courage to kill off almost all Armenians, and while they were in the process they went on further with the Greeks, Jews and Christians because they also had fought too long against accepting the Turks’ desire to integrate. They were so brazen as to adhere to their religion and language as well as to profess their origin and had the gall to put value into the education of their children. Those who know how tenderhearted and sensitive our Turks are should have known that that would not come out well. The history of discrimination of Turks is therefore a young one, and already the Turks feel threatened and provoked by more capable and cultured people.

“The unsuccessful Integration policy of the last 30 years”

“The State has failed and been neglectful of integration for 30 years” was said quite often in the round, and in this moment I asked myself whether I also could profit from this unsuccessful policy of integration by putting myself in a talk show, rant about the Germans and still get a job offer for doing so. But then it occurred to me that I don’t have any noteworthy previous convictions to show for myself, and that I otherwise don’t have the talent to make everyone else constantly responsible for my failures. After all, not everyone can have the fortune of being born and grow up as a Turk.

In the next passage, I will adapt the use of language to that of the Turk Somuncu as he presents it to us in his videos on YouTube. This is how reverse integration runs and when one attempts to use a Turk as a model:

The next sh–heap and Turk in the round whose turn it was to read the riot act to the Germans was Serdar Somuncu. The only thing that this baldheaded a–hole had for it was complaints, after all he is a Turk. It is held before the Turks that they’re different, so our fat meatball says and also mentions the term “present condition” in order to demonstrate that we’re dealing with an intelligent person here. That the language ability is alone enough to become integrated here is, by the way, one of the myths of integration policy that is constantly being cultivated here in Germany. The Turkish a–hole Serdar demonstrates impressively that it doesn’t matter how well one masters the German language because if one remains a Turk in his head, then one follows it with the fascist and genocidal attitudes of the Turks. This becomes clearly noticeable in his further expressions: “We could have forced it upon ourselves” meaning by this the concessions of German society with regard to Turkish immigrants. Next he calls for “inner Turkish dialog” in order to assess what kind of integration the Turks desire so that he can afterward present it to the Germans as an ultimatum and then see “what opinion German society form to about it.”

It doesn’t have to do with dialog here, no. The Germans, in Serdar’s opinion, are not to be talked to. The Turks are the ones that must place the demands and afterward one will observe whether and how submissively the Germans bow to these demands. Whoever is still interested in finding out what integration looks like in the imagination of the sh—- Turk Serdar only has to listen closely to is voice: “Why don’t the Germans learn Turkish? That would solve the problem of authority.”

That’s what culture sensitive integration looks like. The fascist attitude that makes up the Turks is compacted in these expressions from our model Turks. But before we make ourselves guilty of prejudice here, we should take a look at other countries that have had more “experience” in living with Turks. In Greece, for example, there are a few villages where Turks live. The Greek inhabitants in those places are the ones that have to learn Turkish in order to get along with these people because even today the Turks living there don’t see the need to learn the language of the present country in which they live. It doesn’t look any different in Iran, and even that the Persian language is taught in schools is perceived by the Turks as a crime and chauvinism and loudly lamented.

The Secondary School Teacher

Next, Mrs. Espe had to explain why the German teachers so massively discriminate against our Turkish enhancers. She spoke of the problems in the school and of how one as a teacher must handle things with the pupils. When the situation becomes dicey in the classroom, she must consider “whether I attempt to calm the situation with my action or I pile more onto the situation.”

This is how pedagogic work looks in Germany in the year 2010. Whether and how a teacher acts with relation to Turkish pupils alone decides the degree of aggressiveness these pupils bring into the day. There are therefore the Turks that are an authority and not necessarily the educated teacher. Integration policy, on the other hand, is being carried out in intercultural dialog between Turkish street gangsters and vegetable traders. Now, at the latest, it must be clear to each one who is really practicing integration here. So much for the highlights of this program upon whose collaborators one would wish at the least a serious automobile accident.

The Turkish Lawyer

There was still the Turk Emin Capraz who reported about his problems in school that were similar to those that many German parents and pupils have experienced. In his case, however, this could be only an expression of hostility to foreigners. However, when he brought the issue to the lawyer, the next stroke of fate followed. His lawyer colleagues communicated to him that his clientele would scare away the other customers and apart from an association with him. At least the people that said that to him were honest enough to say it. I would have clearly told him that the sight of fat birth machines wearing head covering were an encouragement for any member of the human race, and that nobody would want to seek out a lawyer’s office whose waiting room took care of any Turkish gangsters. It’s bad enough that this scum can be constantly encountered in the street, where one can decide for himself that he would rather spare himself the trouble. Emin then announced his intention to leave Germany, and thought that this in fact would be a terrible loss for this country. The question remains, however, why he doesn’t take the head cover wearing creatures right along with him.

Udo Ulfkotte

He also took up words for a few minutes, in contrast to the other three Turks that had dominated the program up to that point. Especially interesting was the place where he reported about Denmark and that the country there was preventing the further influx of immigrants in areas that were already heavily populated by immigrants. This was to serve the purpose that no parallel societies would be formed and that the immigrants would integrate better among the Danes.

This, however, was absolutely not the interpretation of Madame Böhmer and the moderator of the program. Böhmer said that it can’t be right to bus children to another area for them to go to school. Anyone trying to find sense and logic in her words here will do so in vain. The handlebar moustached Wieland Backes and moderator of the program took the words from Madame Böhmer as an occasion to assert that if it were up to Ulfkotte, he would certainly ship the people somewhere else by bus. At that, Böhmer and Backes laughed a bit about Ulfkotte and were certain that they had made a pretty good joke.

At the end Backes wanted to hear more precisely once again why our babyface Hüseyin Ekici first failed in German society. Hüseyin answered: had no perspective and couldn’t understand what could be expected from teachers and society, and the “biggest reason” was not being accepted.

SWR Fernsehen – Nachtcafe (SWR TV) Part 1 – Part 2

Conclusion

The sight of moderator Wieland Backes is reason enough not to watch this program. Of course, this busybody, whose pension the taxpayers will have to pay for, doesn’t live among immigrants. He makes himself comfortable in his gated-community home and is the mark of a fine wine drinker. What the German mob has to suffer among the Turks is of no importance to this opportunist. That furthermore leads meto the assumption that only groups that employ violence and constantly threaten with it can get a hearing. Another realization from this questionable TV amusement is that the boycott of TV fees is a patriotic duty for every German. Why, for goodness sake, should I pay so that such figures as Pierre Vogel or these Turkish idiots can weed out their cognitive garbage?

I appeal to everyone not to watch these shows any further, and above all I suggest that you don’t adopt the bases of discussion from these TV smear comedies as your own bases of discussion. Not a Backes and not one Turkish sh– heap like Serdar Scheisscu will determine Germans should debate about. This should be up to the German people, and fortunately they are much further along.

This has to do with whether one will further bow to the fascist activities of the Turks on German soil.

Is it even permissible to debate over whether one should allow the Turkish subculture to have an influence on society here? I say no, and anyone who calls himself an antifascist should come to the same conclusion.

The faces we perceive as the faces of Turks are for the most part Bosnians, Greeks, Armenians, Kurds, Zazas and others. People who were previously forced to become Turks. Among them are millions of descendants of Europeans who were hauled from Europe to Turkey as slaves. Their descendants furthermore are forced to wear head covering and forced into marriages as child brides, and indeed in large proportions even in Germany. If these people would have freedom, security of rights and protection from repressions like any person in our free society should be able to claim, then they would free themselves from the Turkish subculture, at the latest within two generations, and at least become a part of German society and see themselves as Germans here. Leftwing circles, however, battle against this and believe that this subculture, born out of the spirit of slaveholding, that it has a justified existence and was on its part intended to have an influence on German society.

Honor killings and forced marriage serve as the lordship of terror for Turkish society, even to keep itself up in other lands, for in free competition of cultures, Turkish culture cannot survive, it would disappear. Since the Turks know this, they will not wratched down their aggressiveness and threats in the future, and furthermore, will keep up the artificial identity and mafia ideology of Turkish society, with any means possible. This is where the Germans make themselves accomplices to fascism and to the Turkish slaveholder that will not let go of their booty for any price.

Integration is to be consistently followed with willingness, and those who immigrate to a country in order to change it according to their ideas with violence and threats simply have nothing there to find. In addition it leads to a strain on the open and free society when a culture is one-sidedly given advantage and privileged like what happens to a massive degree in the case of Turkish culture and Islam in Germany. Advertisements are made through taxpayer funded posters on which women wearing head covering are found, or the children’s edition of Der Spiegel where the wearing of head covering is portrayed as something completely normal and voluntary among children; these are not the exception, rather are becoming more and more the rule. Whoever continues to buy Der Spiegel should at least not complain when his daughter gets raped by immigrants in the neighborhood or the school because he should really have known better. With head covering, she would have been spared, wassalaam! (used as a greeting when leaving, like saying good bye)

This chumming up and attitude that ends up being slave-like makes itself noticeable to Islam. It can really be assumed that Muslims would drop their religion after two generations, at the latest, in the West. This, however, only if there is the freedom of speech in order to express oneself about Islam. However, this can’t be done here whereby this right of not being able to criticize a religion has nothing to do with humanism or with citizens’ rights. It is an act of whim, anti-Enlightened and undemocratic to criminalize critics of Islam and experts on Islam only because they have claimed the right to express their opinion openly.

The Left as well as religious circles, however, have long since been suspect of free thought and the freedom of the individual. All of the sudden people can no longer be controlled, and they even develop their own will. No more chance then to level everything out so that there is then only one dynasty, one culture and one language.

The Left are also hot about this, just as Muhammad was in his time. Are women being abused? then force them under the veil. To educate the men so that they behave in a civilized fashion is, on the other hand, a more complex affair than spreading a cloth over the head of women so that the Muslim and Turkish organ not run amok. Just as primitive is the thoughts of the Left as well: There is strife when differing opinions exist, so lets see to it that only one opinion is tolerated.

The same thing applies in the case of multiculture. We all must, completely independent of cultures and subcultures themselves, pull together into one uniform, equal culture, so at least, if one follows the Left’s ideology. Then we are all Borgs and there are no conflicts anymore. So simple, in fact, is the thinking of the Left. The language Esperanto is the most notorious example for this kind of thinking. The language was conceived as an international language because the assumption was made that if everyone spoke the same language, all interpersonal and international conflictions would solve themselves. Every linguist and anthropologist knows that the human and nature altogether are inclined to diversify and not to become uniform, but that doesn’t matter to our leftwing friends. For them, the only thing important is the belief that the rules regarding the nature of people can and should be overcome.

Communism didn’t necessarily fail because the idea of a classless society was messed up and the nature of people contradicted it. No. It failed because the whole world was not communistic, or that’s how things behaved if you ask a leftwing person.

Of course, it is easy to assert that one is superior to others when nobody competes with him or no competition exists. And just this is what also puts Islam out. Islam stakes an idiotic and criminal claim as the sole legitimate authority in all of peoples’ questions and interests. At the same time it demonizes all dissident opinions and voices. To accept such a criminal way of thought as a religion leads to the death of pluralism and freedom. One only has to look at any Islamically dominated country to be convinced. Where Islam governs, there also governs at the same time death, poverty, illiteracy and despotism over the people. The same applies just the same way in the case of the ideology of Turkish culture: