All the best to you,

Translation: Anders Denken

The interview has been published in the meantime, and we don’t want to hold it back from our readers. Of course, the unfair editors – the query came from a Merve Durmus – still had to place a mendacious introduction above it and identify us as leading thinkers of lunatic neonazis without any kind of argument. Otherwise, the interview was reproduced word for word (See translation in English below). There is also a comment area. Too many comments, however, would perhaps exaggerate the value of this medium.

Translation of the interview in German Turkish News (Deutsch Türkische Nachrichten):

German-Turkish News: You write: “A terror that is not perceived as terror is no terror at all.” Do you not believe that nine murdered immigrants have called up feelings of being terrorized among the Turks – perhaps precisely because nobody had any idea where the enemy was located?

Politically Incorrect: No, because the murders were spread out over an extended period of time and several kilometers apart, the last one in 2006. Other than the direct family, everone has long forgotten about it. Besides that, even the Turks didn’t know who it was.

German Turkish News: You write: “What have these leftist NGOs done until now other than discuss things with themselves.” What needs to happen in order to stop extreme rightwing acts of violence?

Politically Incorrect: Nobody knows of a recipe, otherwise it would have been employed. Besides police and justice for deterrence of totally stupid felons of all shades, it would certainly be helpful if politics would not constantly shift to the left. During the times of conservatives like Franz-Josef Strauss (CSU), there weren’t any acts of violence due to hostility against foreigners in Bavaria. But when young people are told every day how stupid and dumb and old-fashioned they are, and that they are scum and nobody asked their opinion, and that they deserve to be exterminated, then some will dig in their heels and fight back against genuine and supposed antagonists.

German Turkish News: You write about the neonazis in Zwickau: “At this point, we have a confused, xenophobic and murderous trio from the precariat.” Do you believe that extreme rightwing thought has something to do with the social environment? Is there also a confused and xenophobic body of thought in increased measure among the parents?”

Politically Incorrect: No, in the precariat, more right thoughts are found than among the upper ten thousand because these people who are the first feel the drawbacks of unbridled immigration. One should house 1000 Rotation Europeans (previously called gypsies) in the new Spiegel high-rise in Hamburg, let’s say for one year. The weekly Spiegel would then be purest joy. Xenophobic way of thought can hardly be found in Germany, in contrast to in Turkey.

German Turkish News: You write: “If everything comes true this way, then a wave of outrage will spread through the country, light chains, memorial services, demos, addresses, debates in state and federal congress, political demands, a ten-fold increase of millions in the “Battle against the Right” and the question of who is responsible for it. For it won’t be long before the leftist-filthy Dumont publisher and tutti quanti happen to stumble completely surprisingly upon PI as the main instigator.”

Politically Incorrect: Are you trying to set a big trap for us? Our answer is totally simple: We hope that as many people as possible, old and young, right- and leftwing radical, conservative and moderate, male and female, Germans and Turks and Arabs, Chinese and Eskimos, Catholics, Hindus and Muslims read PI. The more the better!

German Turkish News: You write: “Therefore, we can luckily say that the series of devious murders played out against eight individuals of Turkish origin and one Greek victim between 2000 and 2006; the last murder was on April 6, 2006. PI, however, was established only on 11/11/2004.” Do you believe that a publication like PI is contributing more to the reduction of violence – because, in a sense, you are offering a release valve by making use of the right to free speech?

Politically Incorrect: Maybe or maybe not. Who can know? Our goal is primarily to correct the reporting of the other media who never report about deficiencies in Islam or in the uncontrolled immigration. We attack the so-called political correctness that we hold to be an evil, but also any other possible areas, be it Euro or Eco!

German Turkish News: You write: “Der SPIEGEL article about PI, (notation DTN) serves only one purpose: To give Constitutional Protection arguments as to why PI should be monitored now.” Are you afraid that the media will now be able to take a new approach in agitating Constitutional Protection against you?

Politically Incorrect: No, we’re not afraid of that because we have nothing to worry about, anyone can read the articles, even Constitutional Protection. We do expect, however, that the red-leaning mass media will pick at us for so long that Constitutional Protection will eventually be weakened and give in, which, of course will make no difference. They can’t ban us. As you perhaps know already, the communist and atheistic Left Party is also being monitored by Constitutional Protection but yet is still sitting with party strength in Congress.

Caption under image in German Turkish News: Members of PI recall the times of the great propagandists when they think about the German media: “The propaganda machinery of Goebbels-like political correctness is running full steam ahead!”. (photo: archive)

Posted on PI by kewil / Translated by Anders Denken

Somehow, the idea floats around in the heads of some here that PI should only be nice and express themselves in a refined fashion like the queen, and then finally they would be accepted by the mainstream media and accepted as a serious partner in the debate. Nothing could be farther from the truth. Our mainstream media, the ruling political science, and the leftwing parties (i.e. Edathy, SPD, communists like SED-Jelpke) would like to spread their ideology uninterrupted and ban, wipe out, isolate and destroy dissident thinkers.

The spiel of leftwing gang after gang is as primitive as it is effective. The ball is thrown back and forth, which the other party picks up and plays it back to the other opponent with renewed drive; the main thing is that the collection of lies continues to swell and influence unsuspecting contemporaries. One fine example is the manipulated discussion for stirring up Constitutional Defense against PI. The concerted effort is summarized here:

The current campaign started with the terrorist Breivik on 7/22/2011. After the initial shock, the search for whom to blam quickly commenced, and the leftwing mob was only too glad to make a direct connection between PI and the mass-murderer. When this didn’t work, the question was disingenuously posed whether it would be possible that also in Germany someone like Breivik might surface, having been stirred up by PI articles, which was thrown to the air with affirmation. On 7/26/2011, the eco-red periodical founded by RAF sympathizers, taz, wrote with concern:

Still unmentioned [in the Constitutional Defense Report 2010] is the central organ for the German enemies of Islam, the blog “Politically Incorrect” (PI). In an intentional stand of defense, PI warns of a self-proclaming religious dictatorship in Germany.” The influential blog is clicked on around 60,000 times each day. 52 “PI groups” around the country are introduced on its homepage.

No doubt, extremely dangerous! Also, on 7/26/11, the same day, Florian Rötzlöffel Rötzer seconded with the same garbage in the pink Telepolis On 8/18/2011, the SED communists made a “little” inquiry with the German federal government under direction from red hairdresser Ulla Jelpke:

Moreover, there is an increasing number of anti-Islamic Internet sites. Where things are often being stirred up in a way that is racist, hostile to foreigners, insulting, filled with hate, and that often promotes violence against people of Muslim faith and Islam, and in general against immigrants from Near- and Middle-East countries.

And further down:

10. How much of the anti-Muslim, racist and violence-encouraging statements does the federal government recognize?

a) Does the federal government consider such expressions of disturbing the public peace and the peaceful cohabitation of people acceptable?

b) How much is the federal government of the persuasion that PI’s confession is distinguished by the Constitution per se as a rightwing orientation compared to that of having a focus contrary to the fundamental order of peace and democracy?

The answer was handed down by the government on 9/2/11, note their conclusion here that anti-Muslim and racist entries were found to be only isolated and in the comment area.

It simply couldn’t be left this way. On 9/12/11, the privately and publically red-leaning hairdresser Jelpke complained on her Internet page that we “don’t show up in brown shirts with Hitler moustaches.” Otherwise her game would have been much easier. Simultaneously – there are coincidences – red aide-de-camp Florian Rötzlöffel Rötzer took up words on 9/12/11 in Telepolis with the information from his bosom buddy Jelpke.

On 9/14/2011, the Dumont press then commenced with their elaborate, song-like campaign with a couple of presumably stolen E-mails or illegally monitored Skype dialogs, blew them up, lied in addition, and portrayed PI as a danger for Germany that should be taken seriously; the only thing missing was the hint of a coup against the state. The article appeared on this day in the Frankfurter Rundschau, the Berliner Zeitung and the Kölner Stadtanzeiger simultaneously (links and commentary here)! One day later came the ready echo from the red-leaning pool of lies, Telepolis.

In the meantime, on 9/17/11 the leftwing Press of the Confederation awakened and began taking shots at a former colleague of PI, a glowing champion and defender of Israel, so that they could shoot her down as a pastor with cruel and devious smears. (This action is still going on.)

On 9/18/11, the rear gun of democracy, der SPIEGEL printed and online, shot its barrel burst. When you compare the texts with the Dumont smears, you’ll notice that there’s nothing new in them, only the same “proofs.” That same day, also on 9/18/11, the Islamic submarine Meli Kiyak served up “her own research” about PI with complete “vulgarity and uninhibited” in the Berliner Zeitung, again the same old rotten stuff.

On 9/26/11, the rear of democracy’s rear gun, the red-leaning, nihilist SPIEGEL was burning, so it plugged together deep psychological analyses of Brevik-PI! One day later, on9/27/11, the barrage of fire from the red-leaning Dumont artillery ensued, Frankfurter Rundschau and Berliner Zeitung appeared with identical articles. The ruminating Geyer intended at all costs to achieve Constitutional Defense monitoring.

After their concoction started to appear as a fad, just two days later, on 9/29/11, they fired their great barrel burst and stated that PI had threatened the secret service. None of that worked, though, for Constitutional Defense would simply not “monitor” PI. On 10/1/11, the leftwing inquiry was flanked once again in the Frankfurter Rundfunk by “Kröver Nacktarsch” Sabine Schiffer.

Anybody who thinks that red nobodies will simply give up have deceived themselves. On 10/31/11, the communist hairdresser Jelpke made another “little” inquiry with the federal government. In this one, the Dumont articles that have meanwhile appeared are named as new evidence, and the government is being asked whether they still maintain that PI is no danger:

We ask the federal government:

1. How much and with what backing does the federal government continue to hold to its assessment found in Bundestag publication 17/6910 with regard to the website Politically Incorrect and other websites and organizations hostile to Islam and Muslims, in light of press reports in the meantime (see previous note)?

Two days ago, on 11/6/11, the rear gun of democracy followed with a rehash. Thus yesterday, on 11/7/11, the second inquiry by the communist Jelpke mentioned above landed in the Bundestag. And so, this has now continued month after month without yielding anything new. Everything simply gets reheated and repackaged. Read whatever you wish, it’s always the same.

Of course, those belonging to the Red Combo are sympathizers such as Antisemitism-Benz who are quoted as authorities, and other informers and secret helpers of the journalists that quote each other mutually, for example, the infamous political blogger Näher and journalist Geyer. They are all on Wiki. The journalists’ smears about PI are collected on leftwing-twisted Wiki as an objective lexicon of truth, and then two weeks later, the erstwhile fabricated web of lies appears in the press as evidence from Wiki. A vicious circulus vitiosus! But the Left is dilligent. Meanwhile, in Wiki there are more footnotes about PI than in the lexicon entry about Jesus Christ!

The photo above shows a panel with a quote from Augstein mounted on the recently inaugurated, new SPIEGEL high-rise in Hamburg. “Tell it like it is!” That has yet to occur with a leftist!

By kewil for PI. Translation by Anders Denken)

(By Thorsten M. / Translation: Anders Denken)

With the approval of both of Dr. Schröter’s children, the Citizens’ Movement Pax Europa founded the “Hiltrud Schröder Freedom Award“. PI founder Stefan Herre was given the honor of being the first recipient of this memorial award with a small donation as well. Three weeks ago, the award was conferred during a small ceremony.

In his commendation as interim national head of Pax Europa, René Stadtkewitz praised the person for whom the prize is named and especially award recipient Stefan Herre and for his service of bringing PI into existence. He emphatically showed how blogs like PI’s have managed to establish a counterbalance to Islam’s massive growth of influence in Germany.

Stefan Herre emphasized in his speech of thanks that Europe’s islamization was only a symptom of a general situation of decadence in the West. The real problem is more that of the demographic decline in our Western societies that through the reduction of native births to one third in just 40 years has room has been created for the mass immigration of Islam.

In his outlook on the future of PI and other internet blogs critical of Islam, Stefan Herre said – who due to reprisals in the meantime has turned PI over to other hands – predicted a further growth of influence. In the US or even France, bloggers have joined in the decision about which themes will end up on the political agenda. Even in Germany this trend will not be held back due to the disappearing relevance of the print media.

As Gates of Vienna is reporting, Hans Erling Jensen created an excellent business model for selling the prints. He thoroughly understands viral marketing on the internet, and the involvement of prominent Counterjihad blogs in the effort would have provided significant international exposure and guaranteed a large volume of sales. Offering the bloggers a commission while they served a good cause assured their willing participation.

Unfortunately, Hans did not have the final say in how things would be done at the Foundation: that was up to the Board of Directors. Not long after the launch of the initiative, the Board had second thoughts, and shut the viral sales program down.

Europe News has written a brief explanation of what happened:

Goodbye to the Westergaard Foundation

It was with great fanfare that the Westergaard Foundation was announced on May 2nd, 2011. Unfortunately, significant internal trouble developed immediately afterwards. Here is a short roundup of what happened, and why the drawing is no longer available for sale at an international network of blogs, as was the original intention.

The concept was simple and attractive:

• Kurt Westergaard created an original watercolour painting entitled ”Free Speech”.
• Signed prints of the drawing could be purchased for €100 apiece, affordable for most everyone interested in supporting Free Speech.
• An international network of blogs would carry the banner and a PayPal link, so that the readers could easily order the print. A raw list of some 50 blogs was to be the initial network.
• The seller’s blog would receive a €30 commission for promotion of the Foundation.
• The remaining €70 (minus a small handling fee) would go into the Foundation.
• The Foundation, in turn, would use the funds to award prizes to artists in need of support due to what they have expressed, providing both publicity and money for the artist.

The press conference on May 2nd was well attended, with Hans Erling Jensen, Erik Guldager, Kurt Westergaard and Farshad Kholghi presenting the project. The presentation took place at Galleri Draupner in Skanderborg, Denmark, owned by Erik Guldager.

The same evening Erik Guldager and Kurt Westergaard presented the project on Danish national television, in four-minute segment displaying the painting and describing the project in a nutshell. The presentation was recorded and immediately translated into English by volunteers, to promote the Foundation internationally.

As a consequence of the television appearance, public interest soared. Unfortunately the web sites behind the project were not yet operational: The Galleri Draupner web site did not have the PayPal link up, the Westergaard Foundation web site was not online — and at the time of writing still isn’t. As an emergency measure, to accommodate all the incoming orders, a redirect to Eticha, the home page of Hans Erling Jensen, was established. 198 prints were sold between May 2nd and May 5th, after which Hans Erling no longer had access to follow the sales stream.

In the week following the press conference, the following sites featured the banner and the PayPal link selling prints of the Free Speech painting on May 5th 2011:

• Eticha
• Politically Incorrect
• EuropeNews English
• EuropeNews German
• Vlad Tepes Blog
• International Civil Liberties Alliance
• Gates of Vienna
• Sajdet.dk
• Hodjanernes blog

Many other web sites had expressed their interest, but were awaiting further information or PayPal codes. It is worth noting that neither Galleri Draupner or the Westergaard Foundation web sites had the banner up, in spite of Galleri Draupner being the first to receive the necessary PayPal code after the account had been established on April 28th.

At a meeting on Friday, May 6th 2011, the board of the Westergaard Foundation (Erik Guldager, Kurt Westergaard and Peter Andersen) decided to change the strategy of the Foundation. Hans Erling Jensen, whom Erik Guldager had charged with organizing international sales, was not invited to the meeting. In a statement sent to Hans Erling Jensen, Erik Guldager stated that since, ostensibly, only 3-4 sales outlets had been established, that the original premises of the project had thus not been fulfilled, and for that reason a wholly new strategy had to be adopted by the board. Notably, no expectations for the number of sales outlets had been published in advance.

Under the new strategy, only Galleri Draupner is to have the Free Speech drawing up for sale, and all other sales outlets were to terminate immediately, and no later than Monday, May 9th 2011, after which any sales made would not be honoured. However, the sales outlets were not informed by Erik Guldager, who has made no public statement about the change of strategy, even after repeated requests by contributing volunteers that Erik should explain the changes publicly.

As for the sales already made: Due to the Westergaard Foundation and Draupner web sites not being ready at the time of launch, Eticha carried the bulk of the sales immediately after the May 2nd press conference. Hans Erling Jensen, owner of the Eticha web site, expects that the promise of a 30% share of the sales will be honoured by Erik Guldager, and states that all of this money will in turn be applied directly to an international forum promoting and defending Free Speech, in line with the original intention of the Westergaard Foundation.

If you have purchased a Free Speech print, we recommend that you:

1) Verify that it arrives in a timely manner. Orders are currently being honoured, all prints should be in the mail within a week.

2) Make sure the print arrives in good shape, as there have been some reports of suboptimal envelopes for the prints.

3) Follow the Westergaard Foundation web site to stay up to date on how the money generated by the sales is being applied. At the time of writing, at least 200 prints have been sold. Deducting the 30% share for the seller, this leaves € 14,000 in the Foundation. This would enable the Foundation to award decent prizes to relevant artists in the name of Free Speech.

During the preparations for the launch of the Westergaard Foundation, Erik Guldager received support and contributions from many volunteers, above all Hans Erling Jensen, but internal correspondence has made it clear that only Erik Guldager and the other two board members have the right to act on behalf of the Foundation. For this reason, any correspondence, questions and complaints should be directed to Erik Guldager of Galleri Draupner (erik@guldager.net), as he is at the moment the only responsible representative and sales point of the Westergaard Foundation.

In sum, the initially announced international Kurt Westergaard Free Speech campaign is no more, and the banner has been taken down. We expect that Erik Guldager will document the number of sales, in particular those made from May 5th up until today, and pay out the promised 30% bonus to all blogs involved, including Eticha.dk.

(Source: Gates of Vienna)

If you wish to support PI on a regular basis, a new means of deposit is available for you. You can fill the form out directly on the page. After you have completely entered all necessary data, please print the signed authorization out, scan it in and send the document in electronic form to spenden@pi-news.net.

For some time now, you have been able to Flattr PI articles: OK, how does it work?

I register with Flattr, load my credit with Paypal and then I can determine how much money I want to give other Flattr users per month (two euros is standard). Therefore, when I surf on the Web and read interesting and Flattr-worthy things, I can click on the Flattr button ‘Like’. Sometimes I do that with just one article in the month, sometimes 100, just depends on how much praiseworthy stuff I find. At the end of the month, my monthly amount gets divided among my clicks so that a blogger in the first case receives 2 euros, and in the second case each of the 100 bloggers receive 2 cents.

You can find the Flattr button at the end of every article on PI.

So, following the style of the Süddeutsche Zeitung, the election victory of Berlusconi and his coalition can also be expressed with: “Berlusconi’s Center-Right Camp Escapes the Election Debacle“. In a somewhat more serious tone, however, Die ZEIT attempts to give air to their worries: Surprise Success for Berlusconi:

The Central-Right camp of the Italian government boss, Silvio Berlusconi, has posted surprising gains after stable projections. The conservative ruling coalition relieved the Left of both southern regions Calabria and Campagna.

In Piemont and Latium the Center-Right camp turned up in an uncatchable lead in a long head-to-head run late Monday evening. “These results strengthen the government,” Defense Minister Ignazio La Russa rejoiced: “Berlusconi has shown that he always wins when a referendum is put for or against him.”

Because of this, a “France Effect” remained notably absent: The opposition from the Left had hoped that they could inflict painful and clear-cut losses against the conservative side similar to what happened in the local elections of the neighboring country. According to evaluations by observers, regional problems were deciding factors for many voters, like in Campagna with its garbage problems.

In Italy, 13 of the 20 regions held elections. Eleven of these regions had been in the hand of the Left since 2005, two are governed by Berlusconi’s camp. The local elections on Sunday and Monday were marked with a lower voter participation. Only around two out of three voters went to the booth, just under eight percent less than 2005. Berlusconi had elevated the elections to a national test for his government three years before the next parliamentary election.

The Left had hoped for a turnaround and had laid everything on Berlusconi’s affairs, slip-ups and corruption trials causing a setback for the Cavaliere. Above all, Berlusconi’s Party “People of Freedom” (PdL) was supposed to suffer from weak voter turnout, according the last polls. According to the statements from the Ministry of the Interior in Rome, only 63.6 percent of the just under 41 million registered voters cast their votes. In Italy, there is usually a high voter turnouty.

Over 63 percent voter participation — for years, one has been only able to dream about such a turnout in Germany’s local elections. And again a people in Europe has voted other than what the German press deemed acceptable. That is what one would call a discrepancy between public opinion and published opinion. One has to wonder if some embittered leftwing journalist isn’t wishing for a return to the times of the German Democratic Republic, since there was a certain preselection of voter possibilities made available in democratic elections so as to avoid erroneous decisions. We German conservatives, however, want to say thank you dear European neighbors, Dutch, Swiss, Italians, that you haven’t left us alone with these leftwing people!

(Translation by Anders Denken)

https://deutschekartoffel.wordpress.com/

Be sure to bookmark this address for access to information in a pinch. We ask for your understanding during this inconvenience and hope to have this work completed as quickly as possible.

During the slaughter of Badr, the self-proclaimed prophet gave his followers the promise that “each one of them that would be slain in the battle would enter into Paradise according to Allah’s will. One of his warriors, Umayr bin al-Human, cried out, “So there is nothing that stands in the way between me and my entrance into Paradise, except for my death by these men?” Right then he was eating a couple of dates, threw them aside, rushed into battle and fought until he was killed. Unfortunately, I didn’t get the chance to address Elfiky about this story because we were gracefully passed up on the discussion.

I had the opportunity, though, to catch Elfiky in a lie. After all, he asserted most earnestly that the self-proclaimed prophet had gotten along well with Jews. I then pointed out that he must have had an especially good understanding with the 600 – 800 imprisoned Jews that he beheaded partly by his own hand in Yathrib. We Jews were the first victims of the Muhammedins, and to this day we are still being persecuted by them. Look at the pictures of the Hezbollah warriors for yourself at how they salute each other with the Hitler greeting. Take a gander at the sales numbers for “Mein Kampf” in Arab countries, especially in Turkey up to 2005. Read the Hamas Charter through, where the prophet Muhammad is cited as saying:

The Last Judgment will not come so long as the Muslims do not fight and kill the Jews. But then, the Jews will hide themselves behind rocks and trees, and the rocks and trees will call out: ‘Oh Muslim, there is a Jew hidden behind me, come and kill him.’ (Article 7)

In regards to this, I am very happy with the affinity that PI has with Israel. Eckhardt Kiwitt believes that Islam is no religion, but much rather a “political ideology similar to national socialism (Nazism).” By virtue of this, he finds himself in good company. The French philosopher Michel Onfray comes to the conclusion in his book “Traité d’athéologie” (“Treatise on the study of atheism” not in English yet, or the German title “We need no God“) that the epoch of fascism in the 20th century had the greatest variety of colors. There was the brown, the red and the black fascism. They all drowned in the current; only one has saved itself in the 21st century, and there is no end in sight for it: the well-anchored green fascism of the self-proclaimed prophet following the Ayatollah Khomeini’s seizure of power in Iran. And these fascists believe on the word of their god Allah that has been unalterably stated for for all time in the Quran. This god points out the Jews many times as “apes and pigs” (Sura 2, verse 65 / Sura 5, verse 60 / Sura 7, verse 166).

Mr. Boie, it doesn’t matter if you are a Christian, an atheist, or any other “infidel,” you will by no means escape the tirades of hate by this vengeful god. For Allah was apparently pretty sour about the fact that most of those on the Arab peninsula who believed otherwise viewed the new philosophy of his prophet as deception and counterfeit. The same is true today. It is about these facts that you, we, and those of other faiths in the Western world must debate. To look away, to trivialize and whitewash them over is exceedingly dangerous, if not to say careless and irresponsible. Read the Quran; you will comprehend what kind of monstrous danger we are being exposed to.

As to the comment area on PI, I partly agree with you. Some comments truly are hostile to foreigners and end up deleted anyway. You must not forget that there are many enemies of PI that, like unseen “submarines,” put together comments and even create screenshots so that they can use them to blackball PI. For me personally, hostility to foreigners is most profoundly strange. I believe I have more foreign friends than native. But also among my conservative compatriots – I am rather to be classified in the left spectrum – they can’t produce hostility to foreigners. For us, it has to do with an the ideology against which we are battling using all the legal means available to us.

Like Henryk M. Broder, it makes us want to throw up when we must sit in the same room with NPD individuals as well. Willi Schwend, from the BPE committee, made that unmistakably clear in our last meeting at the guild house. We have no room for right-wing or left-wing radicals. The NPD, by the way, is right friendly with Muhammadins, at least when it has to do with Israel. That should cause you to think a little. In my view, converts to Islam are the worst kind anyway. That is where terrorism has been preprogrammed, as we see in Germany with the “Sauerland terrorists,” and very recently in America with “Jihad Jane.” Deep down inside, the one who converts to Islam is a Nazi.

Our Munich PI group is presently one of the most active in Germany. We see ourselves as forerunners and wish to animate all the others to follow our example. I am always glad for each commentator who says “People, this is how we also do it.” At one time, Munich was the capital for a very unhealthy movement, however, this time it will be the capital for the countermovement against green Nazism. April 8, 2010 is just about here, and we are inviting all to the guild house to a presentation by Michael Mannheimer about “Eurabia, the Islamization of Europe.” You, of course, are also cordially invited to this event, and naturally for the sake of SZ’s press coverage, but please stick to the truth. Otherwise you will be argumentatively dissected, that’s something I can guarantee you.

With friendly greetings,
Monika Kaufmann
(Munich PI Group)

» PI: “Anti-Islamic Battle Troops”

(Article for German PI translated by Anders Denken)

A survey of the federal statistics authority in 2005, published June 2006, nearly doubled the 8 million number, to 15.3 million. The survey did not included religious affiliation. Thus the estimated absolute number of Muslims stayed the same. This implied halving the estimated percentage from 40 percent to 20 percent. This seems unrealistic, as immigration of Muslims never was lower than 40%, and their birthrate surely isn’t lower than that of non-Muslim immigrants. Therefore, Raddatz uses the 40 percent to estimate an absolute number of about 6 million Muslims in Germany. Yet even this number, although based on logic, is also unverified. The only thing we definitely know about the number of Muslims in Germany is that we don’t know it. Given the federal surveys lack of interest in the number of immigrant Muslims, analysis of the costs of Muslim immigration is very difficult.

How did this happen? In the 1950s the Federal Republic of Germany started to hire foreign workers, the so called Gastarbeiter or guest workers. First they came from Southern European countries such as Italy. From the early 1960s on this recruitment was expanded to Muslim countries, especially Turkey, and also to North African countries. Turkey faced a rapidly growing, poorly educated rural class, whom the Government there wanted to export. The majority of Turkish guest workers immigrated at a time when there was no more labour shortage in Germany. In fact, unemployment slowly increased.

Nevertheless, there is a growing myth circulating that Turks built up post-war Germany, but most Turks only came became Germany’s economy was already booming. The myths even imply that Turks brought development and culture to our country; for example, water toilets. Perhaps there is some classical Islamic mythologizing here, involving disdain for pre-or non-Islamic cultures or their technological achievements, and even to deny their very existence.

As the result of a massive German family reunion program — frequently directed into the German welfare system — a large Turkish community was rapidly established. In contrast to immigrants from Europe, its members withdrew into insular, parallel societies, especially in the big cities.

Additionally, there were refugees from troubled areas. While Turks make up the large majority of Muslims in Germany, substantial groups include Palestinians, often from Lebanon, and Muslims from former Yugoslavia. In summer 2006, the Federal Government announced, that some 3.000 German citizens with a Lebanese background were to be evacuated from Lebanon. The German embassy in Beirut only knew about 1.000 German citizens. Finally we accepted 6.000 refugees from Lebanon. The Government didn’t want to be too particular about passport controls for humanitarian reasons. How many of them were Hezbollah members, of course, is unknown. Once again, we find that official estimates about how many Muslims are in our country, to say nothing of important details, cannot be relied upon.

The problems caused by Muslim immigrants in Germany are the same as elsewhere. Perhaps at least in the beginning they might have been milder, as immigrants from Turkey had experience in a secular political system, compared to immigrants from more traditional Islamic countries. On the other hand kemalistic Turks cling to a very distinct nationalism, so that it is frequently difficult to separate nationalist Turkish demands from Islamic ones.

A few months ago the German parliament passed a new immigration law. It was not at all effective, but it least implied that people immigrating on behalf of family reunion laws — which mostly means young imported wives — have to be at least 18 years old and to know some 200 words of German. Not only Turkish and Islamic organizations in Germany protested and urged the Federal President, not to sign the law, but even Ankara tried to intervene.

In Germany there are currently 159 mosques, identifiable with cupola and minaret, 184 are being built. Additionally, there are some 2.600 less official-looking Muslim prayer houses. Many of them were or are being built by DITIB, a subsidiary organization of the Turkish government authority for religion, Diyanet. Diayenet also sends imams, who most often don’t speak German and are replaced on a regular basis. Thus Islamization in Germany is not only a question of an ideology but consists increasingly of an intervention of a foreign State — Turkey — in national sovereignty. During the world soccer championship in 2006, Germany’s biggest tabloid, BILD, published photos of young migrants waving a German flag with a Turkish white crescent in its red part. This was not criticized but praised as an example of successful integration. As in other countries, our media praises multiculturalism, whitewashes Islamist excesses, and demonizes critics of Islam as racists or at least blockheads.

Things used to be better. The first generation Muslim immigrants were more integrated than today’s third generation. Today, many Muslim children don’t speak any German when they start school. Immigrant youth often speak a strikingly rudimentary, grammatically simplified and generally incorrect German language, one that has even caught the attention of linguists. Poorly educated native German youths in Muslim quarters increasingly adopt this language maybe to avoid being seen as outsiders. Speaking such a language of course minimizes their chance for work.

Early in 2006 teachers of the Berlin Rütli school wrote a desperate open letter to the school authority, admitting that they had given up hope to cope with the increasing violence, especially by Arab youths, of whom even the slightly less violent Turkish youths are afraid, let alone German and other non-Islamic kids. They also complained that the migrants don’t show any interest in studying or attending school at all, and that parents just don’t care or even insult teachers. Especially female teachers were afraid of their students and didn’t enter classroom without a cellphone, in order to be able to call for help. This caused some public debate for a while, yet proposals tended to blame society alone for the problem. The “solution” then was hire Islamic social workers in schools, since infidel social workers would not be respected by Muslim kids. Another “solution” was to improve cooperation with imams.

Meanwhile, the police force in Germany’s biggest state, Nordrhein-Westfalen, is proceeding to reserve jobs for Muslims, whom they recruit in mosques. The establishment of exclusive Muslim police units is also debated, for better cooperation between the police and Muslim communities. When we define as an unreasonable demand that Muslims accept infidel police officers, we are starting to separate society into Islamic and non-Islamic enclaves.

But I think these are things that all of you know in your own countries. Therefore, I want to go into a subject which we thought was a German problem only, yet now seems more widespread, if not of equal intensity. This is the tactic of the promoters and defenders of Islamization, to conflate, what we might call, to deliberately mix up, critics of Islam and Nazis. You all surely know the accusations such as “racism,” “fascism, or “Nazism” usually are hurled at people who criticize Islam or even question the Islamization of Europe or the Eurabia concept. This is done by politicians, the media, clerics, academia and ordinary people, as well.

As Nazism is our own past, this is perhaps worse in Germany than elsewhere and surely it is more hurtful and intimidating. Sometimes this hysteria to see Nazis anywhere — except where their modern counterparts really are – is just grotesque. But for many people — critics of Islams not excluded — this doesn’t come only from outside but from inside as well, as it is rooted in modern Germans: a mixture of guilt, shame and a fear that one might possibly mutate into a Nazi without noticing it. This undermines the unity of the critics of Islam, causing us to distance ourselves from other people or groups, sometimes perhaps with good reason, yet probably most often, without.

Prospects, that a political party critical of Islamization and mass immigration of Muslims can be established in Germany or that the big conservative party, Chancellor Merkel’s Christian Democrats, could develop in this direction, are poor. This is in part due to our national socialist past and the resulting fear of anything that could be considered xenophobic or nationalist or not sufficiently tolerant. It might as well result from a relatively widespread favorable opinion concerning the European Union. It also is conceivable that German fears of and dislike for any kind of nationalism influences the European Union.

In any case, there are some real neo-Nazis. There is a tiny political party, whose agenda is revisionist and decisively anti-Israeli and anti-American and therefore pro- Ahmadinejad. Yet it is opposed to immigration (not only Muslim) and Mosque-building. The leaders of this party would perhaps like to cooperate with Islamist organizations, and partly do so, but their ordinary members oppose it. Working with this party is out of the question for any reasonable and decent person. Its numbers and impact are both negligible, but the public is sensitive to its existence. Any of their positions which overlap with others undermines the others to the public.

The “Nazi” smears come partly from cynics who seek to silence any critic of their multicultural and pro-Islamic dogma, as well as from some who are sincere about it. Therefore, it makes sense to speak the truth, especially about the historical connections between Nazism and some Islamic authorities, as well as about their ideological similarity and compatibility, especially those concerning the hostility towards Israel and America – or put another way, Jews and devout Christians.

There are some 100.000 Jews living in Germany, most of them immigrants from the former Soviet Union and they are increasingly harassed, especially in public schools. This is horrific, appalling and sad. The harassments originate mainly from Islamic immigrants, but to be honest not only from them. Unfortunately, there is still some original anti-Semitism and anti-Americanism found within the native German population, though most often it is not open aggressive but rather, latent. People really do not want to be Nazis, but unfortunately many have strange ideas about what a Nazi is really like. Information about these dark times, as told by leftists, is especially peculiar. It masks the socialist parts, overestimating the conservative parts, and treats anti-Semitism simply as some kind of xenophobia where Jews just were random victims as they were available, and could easily be replaced today by any other group — such as Muslims. Those Muslims who do not deny the Holocaust — and most Turkish Muslims don’t – find this an easy-to-accept version of history. I think it is essential to never take for granted that the truth needs continuing affirmation. My co-authors and I on Politically Incorrect do so, regularly.

Many people feel a diffuse aversion towards some aspects of Islam, like the oppression of Muslim women, high crime rates, and dependence on welfare because of deliberate lack of education. There are a few prominent figures who speak out against Islamization, but none of them is a politician. There is former Federal President Roman Herzog, a former constitutional judge, who sharply criticized the antidemocratic European Union, but he was widely ignored. Most Germans support the European Union as a garantor of peace in Europe, and perhaps as a way to give up an embarrassing nationality, trading changing German for European. There is hardly any knowledge among Germans about its antidemocratic and Eurabian aspects, so they tend to consider information about it as some odd conspiracy theory. To sum it up, there is only very little resistance against Islamization in Germany.

Therefore, the work that all of you doing to speak the truth is crucial to saving our societies. So, I want to take this opportunity to thank Ms Bat Ye’Or for her precious and great work on the subject. Unfortunately her important book Eurabia is still not available in German. I want to thank all the authors attending the conference for providing us with priceless information and knowledge, which is really helpful to Politically Incorrect and our efforts to inform honestly and to constitute some kind of counterbalance to the biased media.

(Speech at the CounterJihad Brussels 2007 Conference, October 18 – 19)