It was already possible to deport criminal migrants, but Leers wants to lower the threshold a bit. Repeat offenders will be deported within the first two years after three misdeeds, previously this could only happen after five offenses.

The residency permit can now be retracted even after 20 years of stay. Migrants that are convicted of serious crimes like violence, drug trafficking, rape, and sex with minors will be able to be expelled from the country for life.

With this bill, the cabinets wants to make it clear to migrants that they endanger their residency with criminal behavior. This way, domestic violence, drug and weapons trafficking can be fought together.

Experts warn that the law cannot be brought into conformity with the European guidelines. European Human Rights requires that each case must be tried individually. Above all when the ones to be deported will be separated from their families through the deportation.

(Source: Elsevier / Translation: Günther W.)

Posted by PI / Translation: Anders Denken

(By Hans-Dieter Felix Henninger)

Whether this happens through “democratic” over-shouting with a loudspeaker, or is taken care of with “democratic” threats, just so long as the event doesn’t come to fruition. If none of that works, then a few left-democratic rocks go flying, mostly with toleration by the police and sometimes even supported indirectly by them.

Be it far from me to relativize the Holocaust, and I think it’s right that any denial thereof should be penalized. I would also be for a law like in France that punishes any denial of a known genocide. For me, Hitler is not the only causer of the Holocaust, rather, it was much more the whole of Nazi ideology with all its followers and apparatchiks. And so, what really should be said is: “Never again fascism in our country.”

Let’s look now at a different story: How do leftists actually deal with the Holodomor? While it seems to be instilled in leftists today to relativize the GDR (East Germany) crimes and aspire or speak favorably for communism, not even one single Republican (Republikaner party in Germany) would let one hair near the time of the Nazis, and that not just because he wouldn’t dare. Pro groups like Die Freiheit (Freedom Party) wouldn’t at all, even though they are classified quite often as “right-wing extreme” by the left-wing populist press, which makes up nearly the whole German paper forest.

Describing the Holodomor requires a good piece of self-control beforehand. Back years ago, I promised a good friend from Kiev that I’d make this shameful act of Soviet Union socialism somehow better known to Germans. Because of the gruesome details, however, I have constantly pushed it aside. With the Holodomor, the issue was that of a measure undertaken by Communist Moscow to bring the allegedly unmanageable Kulaks in the Ukraine to reason by means of hunger.

When looking into the details or speaking with people that either themselves were there or with their children, what happened there is unimaginable. Harvests in the fields were eradicated while the population starved. Foodstuffs from the Ukraine were scattered in other Soviet republics at dumping prices, while Ukrainian children starved and people became cannibals. Der Spiegel titled it in an article back in January 2007: “When Stalin Turned the People into Cannibals.” It must be noted in addition that it wasn’t just Stalin. Stalin didn’t actually stand in the fields and chase down starving children, Stalin didn’t eradicate or cart off the harvests. It would be just as senseless to push the whole Holocaust at Hitler’s feet. Without helpers and Nazis, Hitler would have done just as with the Holocaust little as Stalin would have with the Holodomor without helpers and Communists.

Now, though, let’s get to our leftists and the Antifa. While every conservative on up to right-wing populists assures us over and over again that he has nothing about the Nazis up his sleeve, and that he rightly invokes every memorial event in memorial of the murdered Jews an other concentration camp inmates, in many countries, the Holodomor is not known about at all.

On the map here,

one can see the countries that have recognized the Holodomor as genocide. Germany is not among them. It would be shameful if we didn’t know that Mrs. Merkel was in the FDJ (Free German Youth, a socialist movement in the GDR), and because of this still has a rather ambivalent attitude about Communism. On one side, Communists are competitors in the allocation of votes, on the other side is actually the good old time when there were those who would render service as informants against critics of the regime and would remain true to the socialist party line in spite of their knowledge about the Holodomor.

But now, once again to the Antifa and their advocates and sympathizers, like Sahra Wagenknecht: Why don’t we see any raging demonstrations from you when left-wing politicians in the state assemblies, especially in NRW and Bremen, want to turn the wheel back to a time when something like the Holodomor was possible? Or are left-wing fascists not really fascists? Are genocides committed by leftists the good murders, and those of the Nazi the bad ones? Are starved children that were consciously made to starve not worth enough for a left-wing demonstration? But in ten years of time, there has been so great a stir over nine murders that there has been an “It’s such a shame” speech from the Chancellor and the former FDJ functionary; but for the Holodomor, however, which according to estimates exacted the lives of 3.5 to 14.5 million victims that died under the most monstrous conditions, there is no desire at all to recognize it as genocide.

Dear Mr. President, dear Mr. President of the Parliament, dear Mrs. Chancellor, dear Parliament, it is a shame!

Guest Contribution on PI / Translation: Anders Denken

More information about the primary in the “Sunshine State” on Fox News.

Posted on PI / Translation: Anders Denken

(By Michael Stürzenberger)

Author Hans Rühle reports:

In all the schoolbooks, it is established that the islamic revolution of 1979 created an especially historical phenomenon: the first islamic government in 1400 years – an islamic theocracy. It is in their natural course of things to please Allah in everything, to lead the people to the real joy of the afterlife, and to spread Islam in the world. Since the islamic revolution was not just a victory over oppression by the Shah regime but also valued as the pinnacle of the battle against its foreign supporters, it has had an international dimension from the very beginning.

Iran has the religious duty of globalizing the islamic revolution and turning the local victory into a universal one. In one schoolbook for the 7th grade, it says regarding this subject: “In order now to advance the islamic revolution, it is our duty, with application of our full strength, to lead the uprising against the arrogant ones (meaning the United States) and the oppressors before all of Islam’s commands and the dissemination of the saving message ‘There is no god but Allah’ has reached the whole world.”

This message is being sent to all Muslims in the world:

Since the oppressors will not rest until they “have driven you from your Muslim identity,” all Muslims should decide to “smash the teeth of the American mouth” (Textbook 11th Grade). In this context, Khomeini’s call to the “Muslims of all the world’s lands” is quoted:

“Since a slow death was imposed on you under the government of the foreigners, you shall overcome the fear of death, and deploy the passionate and martyrdom-seeking youth who are willing to break open the borders of the infidels. Do not think at all about allowing the status quo to continue. Think much more of fleeing the prison, of escaping slavery, and attacking the enemies of Islam. Glory and life lie in the battle, and the first step of the battle lies in the persistence of the will. Afterward comes the decision to impose the ban upon yourselves so that you bring the supremacy of the world of unbelief and of polytheism under subjection, especially America.”

This war for the victory of Islam in the whole world shall be waged as a form of jihad. This victory, however, is not guaranteed. It is Allah’s decision to give Muslims the victory or to make martyrdom possible. In both cases you are the true victor in your convictions.

In Khomeini’s much quoted words: “I declare with absolutely no ambiguity to the world: If the devourers of the world (the USA and their allies) want to oppose our religion, we will stand against the whole world and will not yield until they have all been wiped out. Either we will all be liberated, or we will all enter the greater freedom – martyrdom. … Either we will joyfully shake hands over the victory of Islam in the world, or we will choose eternal life and martyrdom. In both cases victory and success belong to us.”

This view of things becomes understandable when envisioning the unalterable goals of Islam in this whole war: “total victory over the world of disbelief and the arrogance, the eradication of every oppression, the appearance of the Master of Time (the hidden imam), and the institution of Islam’s world government.”

This is a declaration of war on all of the non-Muslim world. And the worst: Allah’s warriors have no fear of death in this global confrontation, since they are promised islamic paradise with the fulfillment of every wish for death in battle – including 72 willing virgins:

The inclusion of the Shiite messianic way of thought of the return of the hidden imam into the list of battle objectives converts the confrontation into a form of Shiite Armageddon between the forces of good and evil. The Muslim who is killed in this fight is a martyr who is glorified in the Quran and to whom paradise has been promised. Much more significant, however, is the fact that, along with the quoted statements by Khomeini, the collective martyrdom of the Iranian people is portrayed as also possible and practical – as “victory.”

Young Iranians are being drilled in the schools to become hate-filled war machines:

In order to survive in this total war, an unbridled hate against the potential opponent is necessary. “The hearts of the pupils shall be filled with hate against the ‘arrogant ones,’” it says also in a teacher’s manual. In a language drill, the pupils are supposed to write the meaning of certain words, among others, the word “America.” The answer from the teacher’s manual reads: “America – the great Satan.”

Even though the Jews are traditionally not considered enemies (?? note the remark by PI below), they aren’t mentioned positively in any schoolbook. Much more of an account is given for Muhammad’s time about the “confrontation with the Jews’ conspiracy,” of “hostility and betrayal of the Jews,” this “greedy group of people.” The real object of hate, though, is the State of Israel. This forms “a basis for America and other aggressive powers” that have the goal of conquering Muslim territory. Israel occupies Jerusalem and the holy place of Islam, the al-Aqsa mosque, and oppresses and kills Palestinians, even children, living under their occupation.

First with the remark: In the Quran, Jews are called “apes and pigs,” they are considered inferior; Muhammad had 800 imprisoned Jews beheaded; in the Hadiths are found several commands by Muhammad to kill Jews, which are also quoted in the Hamas charter – how can they come to say that Jews weren’t “traditionally” considered to be enemies, Mr. Rühle?

Next point: Islam really cannot make any claim to power on Jerusalem, since Muhammad was never there. Also his nocturnal, ominous “flight by horse” to his Burak cannot have gone to Jerusalem, since at that time there was no mosque there. According to the Quran, this flight is known to have gone to a “far away mosque.” Therefore, the Dome of the rock out to be torn down and rebuilt somewhere on the Arabian peninsula. The al-Aqsa mosque ought to be reconverted into the Christian St. Maria Basilica because that’s what it was before it was conquered and made into a mosque eight years after Muhammad’s “fight by horse,” and six years after his death.

Islam is gravely dangerous. It gives the feeling of power and a collective identity as well in which one can feel like a better person. And the legitimization imparts the power to subjugate people of other faiths by expressly allowing violence – culminating in the license to kill.

When will the world wake up?

(Hat Tip: Islam-Nein-Danke, bernte, Hildesheimer, sincimilia, chessie)

Posted by byzanz on PI / Translation: Anders Denken

The new regulation will presumably replace the existing one, which allows qualified workers to remain permanently in the country with a work visa if their employers want to keep them.

A minimum income will possibly be instituted as well for immigrants who wish to stay for a longer period of time. Last year, the Home Office said that the income must amount to more than 35,000 pounds per year in order to receive a permanent residency permit for Great Britain.

It is estimated that around 60,000 qualified work forces per year, including cooks and nurses obtain the right to settle permanently.

Minister of Immigration Damian Green (photo above) said, however, that in the future it will be more difficult to receive a permanent residency permit. “Each will have to prove his usefulness to British society,” he said.

“What we need is a system that attracts such people that can either create jobs or prosperity, or can make a significant artistic or cultural contribution.”

“Reducing the number of immigrants has absolute priority, however, what I intend is “fewer, but better.”

“We want to make Great Britain into the most attractive country in the world for the smartest and best. The era of mass-immigration is over.”

The new measures follow an arrangement from the Home Office last summer which implies that immigrants with a so-called “Tier Two” work visa, thus, skilled workers from outside of the EU that can produce no extraordinary qualifications or large investment capital can count on leaving Great Britain after five years.

Green told the Prime Minister last June, “We must change the status of ‘Tier Two’ immigrants so that they remain only for a limited time in Great Britain, thus, simply as an offset for short-term bottlenecks in the British labor market.”

“In the future, only a carefully controlled minority will be allowed, in the interest of the United Kingdom, to stay permanently.”

Last spring, the Migration Advisory Committee recommended that immigrants who earn less than 35,000 pounds per year be asked to return to their home countries. That would reduce the number of workers from outside of Europe who live in Great Britain, by up to 20,000 per year.

Green said in an interview yesterday that he hopes to be able to establish a new generation of “qualified, highly talented, young people; the smartest and best from the whole world” in Great Britain.

He said that there is also a way for extraordinarily talented persons to remain permanently in Great Britain, including dancers, actors, artists and musicians.

Further measures to be expected in the new immigration regulations are, for example, the institution of an organization in collaboration with the Church of England for the disclosure of fictitious marriages, as well as new rules for the unification of families. For example, both marriage partners must be able to prove that they speak English and are not dependent on social benefits.

(Source: Daily Mail / Translation: Beschwichtiger)

Posted by PI / Translation: Anders Denken

Part 1:

Part 2:

More information about this on The Blaze.

Posted by PI / Translation: Anders Denken

(By Raymond de Toulouse)

Here is the chronology:

The Shafia family, which came from Kabul, leaves Afghanistan in 1992 and lives in Pakistan, Dubai and Australia before moving to Canada in 2007. Here they receive immigration status. A few months later Mohammad Shafia’s first wife follows, her name, Rona Amir. She arrives in Canada in November 2007. A few months afterward, Rona Amir begins to keep a journal in which she speaks of abuses, threats and insults by Mohammed and Yahya.

One year later, April 2009, she flees with the oldest Shafia daughter, Zainab, 19, to a shelter. She would like to take her own life in hand and marry her boyfriend. The Shafia daughters left behind, Geeti and Sahar prompty call the police emergency number and tell about great fear of the father’s reaction over the running away of the oldest daughter. Two weeks later, while the father is on a trip to Dubai, Zainab gives in to the mother’s pressure and returns home. In addition, the mother promises that Zainab may marry her boyfriend. On May 18th, Zainab marries her boyfriend, but the family persuades her to have the marriage annulled a few hours later.

On June 20, 2009, the Shafias’ family computer is used for the Internet search on “how best to commit a murder.” On June 22nd, the three Shafia murderers begin with the concrete planning and carrying out of the murder of their three daughters and Mohammed’s first wife. And in later wiretapped telephone calls by the authorities, the murderers give the reason for their plan: The three daughters and the first wife had become too Western and had tarnished the honor of the family in doing this.

The Crime: The three murderers pretend to plan a vacation trip to Niagara Falls for the ten-member family. For this the need to get a second car. It is a Nissan SUV, which was later found at the bottom of a canal with the four drowned victims inside. On the return trip, a short touring stay in Toronto is planned in order to delay the return trip to Montréal and to find another reason to stay overnight. Then here, in Kingston, is where it happens: Father and son drown the three daughters and the first wife until unconscious or dead, then they put them in the Nissan, which they drove beforehand to the docks. The vehicle is shoved by hand into the canal. The four victims are hidden the next morning, floating around inside the Nissan.

Nevertheless, this sentence differs considerably from the pseudo-judicial German discussion group (“Schmoozing judiciary with an immigrant bonus to assess of the number of hours in social service”). But ultimately, when considering the fact it must be sustained that the people who hamper integration (and in the Shafia case, there were many hints before the murders) actively violate the Constitution. A claim for asylum or a residency permit in such cases should cease immediately, citizenship should be revoked, and legal steps should ensue.

(Sources: citytv.com and ctv.ca)

Guest Contribution posted on PI / Translation: Anders Denken

We find that it took a jury 15 hours to determine the guilt of Mohammad Shafia, his (second?) wife Tooba Yahya, and their son Hamed on four counts of first-degree murder. In Canada, first-degree murder fetches a sentence of life with a chance of parole at 25 years.

Who were the victims? and why?

The answer to the first question: Zainab, Sahar, Geeti, and Rona Amir Mohammad. All women.

The answer to the second question is a little more difficult to make out when looking at mainstream media (MSM) outlets. Readers on the North American continent need to get these three little letters – MSM – fixed in their mind, for the MSM will report what’s happening, but they tend to be selective in which parties they disclose that might be involved in the situation.

Looking at the articles, like in HuffPo, for example, we find that the three sisters, all in their teens, were murdered for defying their family’s rules of discipline regarding dress, whom they might date, with whom they might socialize, and what they would access on the Internet. HuffPo fails to tell us where these disciplinary rules come from.

In the HuffPo Article, however, was no mention of why the (first?) wife was murdered. Could it be that she was childless? This wasn’t in the HuffPo article, but it was in the New York Daily News. Apparently Mr. Shafia married his second wife because his first couldn’t bear children, but he kept both wives. Or, maybe she supported the Western lifestyle that is so despised by the unmentioned, so-called religion, as the prosecutors believed. NY Daily News doesn’t tell us why this Western lifestyle is so hated, either.

HuffPo doesn’t mention Islam at all in connection with these murders. We find the word Islam mentioned only when scrolling down to the comments, which themselves are pretty dicey, and surprisingly still there. They only talk about “family discipline rules.” HuffPo does give a little history of what led up to the murders, though, without stating the driving force behind the rage. So, were these arbitrary rules that this father fashioned just for his family. How is it that there are so many families that adhere to a certain unmentionable religion that have the self-same rules?

NY Daily News does give a little more through the information obtained by wiretap.

CNN took the feminist approach in the last paragraph of the article by attributing it to male sexuality and power and control over the woman’s body.

Interestingly, when scanning the CNN article, other devices of taqiyya (‘deception’ for those who haven’t read through other PI articles yet) can be found in the article. For example, Shafia swore on the Quran and said it doesn’t “condone killing people” to preserve the honor of the family. However, in Islam, many times the Quranic passages are supported by the Hadiths (for those who aren’t familiar with these writings, they are commentaries made by Islamic scholars throughout the centuries after Muhammad’s death), which are also considered dogma by Muslims. A good article to read for a quick introduction can be found at islam-watch.org. Also on the right sidebar of this PI page are good downloadable PDF articles that can give you more information regarding this strange ideology accused of being a religion.

By the way, in the quick scan of MSM (remember MainStream Media) articles, I didn’t find the word ‘Islam’ in any of the articles. They reported the court proceedings, some with more detail, some with less. The truth can be told, but it can also be twisted until there is no way to understand what it really is. Obviously, the western Western media have learned well from their European colleagues.

In Europe, they’ve already been told that such violence has nothing to do with Islam, or Islam is peace. But what has been said in the MSM, and what the complete reality of the matter is can be two totally different things.

Also, did anyone hear that the trial had to be delayed because of a bomb threat? Thanks to Pamela Geller, we are able to obtain this information. Something that wasn’t readily reported about in the M–S–M!

The verdict in the trial? Guilty of four counts of murder. The verdict for the MSM? Guilty of suppressing an important part of the truth.

Previous article about this subject:

» Honor Killings – In Canada?

Posted by Anders Denken

(Eduard Benda on the so-called “Demographic Evolution”)

For decades, the German population has been disappearing because of low birth rates. Fascinated with their idea of a multicultural society and spurred on by a well-meaning helper syndrome, the Germans are choosing to replace the lack of progeny with immigrants. Partly consciously and partly subconsciously, but certainly not without a proper portion of naïveté, it makes no difference that people from countries with strange cultures who are unwilling to integrate and be educated are all too often found among them.

With proper measures, it would be possible to stabilize the German birth rate (better coordination between job and children through adequate and comfortable cribs, child care and kindergarten facilities, full-day schools, shorter work hours, subsidized part-time jobs, as well as increased child benefits, adequate parental benefits that also last for a long enough duration, retirement pensions tied with the number of children and other miscellaneous family-promoting measures). Instead of this, the money needed for this is being tied up in the immigration industry (social aid, unemployment aid, integration measures, extraordinary education and training promotions, social workers, job creation measures, criminal control, etc.)

This condition has already gone on for some generations, while not giving the slightest indication at all of being able to change. Since 1972, the Federal Bureau of Statistics has registered more deaths than births each year without exception. Truly, the political will is presently there to put a stop to the speedy decline in the German population; however, the political priority, as well as the necessary financial means are absent in order to actually stop the decline – for the above-mentioned reasons.

For an ethnic group to continue existence, an average of at least 2.11 children per woman must be born, according to demographic researchers. However, the average birth rate (including the disproportionally high birth rate of immigrants) in 1990 lay according to the Federal Bureau of Statistics at the status quo right at 1.454 children per woman. 20 years later, in the year 2010, the average number of children lay at a whole 1.393 children per woman. Therefore, in spite of years of political efforts to increase the birth rate, the child count has actually decreased further.

From the beginning, the many Muslim immigrants that give birth to more children per woman when compared with the Germans, the Polish or the Russian immigrants must also be taken into consideration. Which means, without them the birth rate would be considerably lower.

The Turks, who represent the bulk of the Muslim immigrants and also present themselves as the largest of all immigrant groups by a large margin (provided the Poles, Russians and others are not included in a group of “refugees”), likewise have the highest amount of progeny per woman (Computation by Berlin-Institut, see information graphic 2):

In the rest, the total portion of Muslim immigrants lay at up to 90% during various years in the previous decades.

According to the Federal Bureau of Statistics, in the year 2010, the daily average was scaled down to 496 more death cases than newborns. Without the higher birth rate of immigrants, this number would be even greater. In the year before, the surplus of deaths was similarly high. If you like, the situation could also be portrayed in the following way:

Every second day, the total number of inhabitants for a small German village are dying, but instead having children, they are being replaced exclusively with immigrants and their [the immigrants'] children. Sometimes totally replaced or sometimes mostly replaced, depending on the annual immigration statistics. And when [those born during] the years with strong birth statistics, that is the baby boom generation of the 50s and 60s, approach the age of morbidity in about 10 years, the percentage ratio between Germans and immigrants will shift even more rapidly. In addition, the average age of the indigenous [Germans] is also generally much higher than that of the immigrants.

The portion of immigrants among those under ten years of age presently lies at a third, and among the newborns, babies with immigrant background achieve nearly 50%. Thus, anyone can figure out that German children in a few years will be in the minority, and that, even though the general immigrant portion is only 20% of the general population at this point. This is where the birth deficit of the Germans in comparison with the fertility potential of the immigrants shows with impressive clarity. In addition to this, when considering the annual surplus of immigration into Germany, the annual surplus of Germans emigrating abroad, and the high German death rate based on the strongly over-aged German society, then the speed of demographic evolution is especially visible. It is unbelievably fast and at the same time hushed. Here are the annual figures from the Federal Bureau of Statistics.

In order to bring about a real stop to the “Demise of the German Type,” the purely German birthrate, hard to believe, would have to be doubled. However, as one can see, extreme political efforts and, above all, enormous financial means would be necessary for this. However, the immigrant industry continues to enjoy political priority. Also, it is because they cannot be easily deported again.

Such a policy no longer has anything to do with MultiCulti and borders more on self-abandonment. For, in principle, the Germans along with their culture are in this fashion gradually but consistently in the process of abolishing themselves. In the media and politics, this is being trivially described as “demographic evolution.” However, it is in fact a demographic catastrophe. In an exaggerated way, one could describe this politically induced so-called “Demographic Evolution” as a form of stealth genocide against our own people.

As an aside, here is a quote from the former Algerian president Mohammed Boukharrouba in his speech in 1974:

“One day, millions of people will leave the southern hemisphere to invade the northern hemisphere. And with certainty, not as friends. For they will come as conquerors. They will conquer them by populating them with their children. The belly of our women will give us the victory.”

The absurd thing with this is that the taxpayer is still completely financing the abundance of children from Muslim parents who are often unemployed. The diligent worker is providing for foreign families of size, while he himself often can hardly afford a second child – for lack of money and time. Nothing against Muslims, who out of conviction belong to society here, and who want to integrate and assimilate. But most of them reject the modern form of society here. After all, they are not here because the crude, Middle-Age, patriarchal, islamic way of life opposes them in their homelands. They are here on the basis of economics, not out of like for the Western lifestyle. Therefore, for decades they have built a parallel society that is becoming larger and larger, a society that is convinced of its archaic ideas of morality and values, and whose religion portrays Christians and Jews as enemy concepts. When their part of the population becomes large enough someday, they will push for the islamization of Germany. Just as their Quran instructs, they will force their religion of Islam on all people, and will want to enforce their lifestyle, laws and their culture as the main culture. Women, more than anybody, should fear for the misogynous, islamic macho culture.

The Muslims still haven’t conquered “the northern hemisphere” yet, however apparently they are on the best path in that direction. Whoever achieves the majority is known to have the power. And Boukharrouba in 1974 would certainly not have been able to imagine that the Germans would make it so easy. As soon as Muslims are powerful enough, it will be no different for the Christians in this country than all the disadvantaged, oppressed or persecuted Christians in the islamically dominated countries of Africa and Asia.

However, the intolerant and politically totalitarian ideology of Islam is not the only problem. On the basis of the uncontrolled immigration and the unconditional social aid system, too many uneducated, unqualified and unmotivated people from the lower classes have also been and are being drawn in, in contrast with the classic immigrant country of Canada. The Germany of our children and grandchildren, who by all appearances will find themselves in the ethnic minority again, will no longer be the Germany we knew. Modern day Germany is underhandedly approaching the conditions of southern and islamic countries more and more every year. For along with the many immigrants come not just people into the country, but with them come similar conditions as can also be found in Africa and other similar countries in Asia, for example.

Conditions of this type, when considered in a relative sense, are already the reality in various neighborhoods of German cities with a high concentration of immigrants, and that in spite of all efforts for integration, in spite of all promotions for education and training, in spite of all job creation measures, in spite of the many social workers, in spite of a well functioning police and judicial system, and in spite of a social network that is one of the best in the world.

Ultimately, the Germans, in fact, are in the process of “constructing” a politically and socially unstable land for their children and grandchildren, where their loved ones will face a strong, intolerant and aggressive Islam and dream longingly for “Good old Germany” that they will learn about from their history books.

Once upon a time, purely Aryan, today multicultural to the point of self-destruction. The truth is, the Germans are headed on the wrong track from one extreme to the other. The good, old Obelix would say today:

Another Article by this Author:

» Out of the Heart of Islam

Guest Article posted by PI / Translation: Anders Denken

Here are links regarding the case:

- Daily Mail
- Asian Image
- Euro Weekly

Really, what good are all the cumbersome ground controls when islamists sit in the cockpit? And you’re not at all allowed to consider all the transportation workers and sanitation forces on the ground. Also, in Heathrow, hundreds of illegals are already employed at the airport! They haven’t had the first passport! With unidentified religion in any case!

Posted by kewil on PI / Translation: Anders Denken

Posted by kewil on PI / Translation: Anders Denken

(By JimPanse)

“Pardon, Mr. High Commander of Multiculti,” I said, “but there exists an error in prohibition, because, well, I thought I was promoting the basic order of freedom and democracy, human rights and the right of any people to self-determination.”

A brutal thug gave me one from behind. “OK then, Ruprecht,” Thierse said and roared at me: “We determin which people have a right to self-determination!!”

“Be… besides that, I remembered the many murders that are committed in the name of Islam…”, I whispered quietly. “Murrrders?! You are definitely – a sleazy rascal!!”, Thierse, beside himself, shouted.

Based on some paragraph from the European Court for Human Rights, I was taken into protective custody for “rightwing populist activities.” Over the gate of the camp stood “No person is illegal.”

Under the singing of the Claudia Roth song (“Sun, Moon and Stars”), we marched every morning through the gate to the work assignment. We produced through piece work strategic materials for the war against the Right. “Why are you here, then?” I whispered to my neighbor. “Denial of Clmate Change,” he answered.

One day I was let go. “On command from way up!”, the guard stressed. “What? By Erdogan himself?”, I stammered in disbelief. “Yes, he answered, “his amnesty for all kuffar on occasion of the celebration of the Turkish EU Presidency.”

I had to sign that I would remain silent about the detention, stay away from all xenophobic-negative activity, and that my children would be educated under the influence of the multiculti doctrine. Then the guard clicked his heels together and briskly saluted: “Never Again Germany!”

Then I awoke. What a crazy dream. And, of course, completely surreal. Only one event was strangely realistic, though: In the camp the Jews, who were condemned as “imperialistic rogue state sympathisers” had it the worst.

Guest Article posted by PI / Translation: Anders Denken

The “Westfälische Nachrichten” :

Rheine (dpa/lnw) – The trial of a young man from the Münsterland, who allegedly boxed his girlfriend’s baby to death in the womb, will likely come before the court again. The defense has filed an appeal against the sentence, a judicial speaker said upon inquiry by the dpa news agency.

In the previous week, the Rheine regional court sentenced the German-Afghan to two years and nine months juvenile detention. According to the judgment, the 21-year-old intentionally dealt his girlfriend heavy fist blows to the belly during a quarrel last March.

At that time, the 19-year-old girl was in her seventh month. The baby died two days after an emergency Caesarean section. Ther had been arguing before the attack because the woman had allowed herself to be examined by a male gynecologist for the first time. If the appeal stands, the case will come bfore the Münster regional court. The accusation states illegal abortion.

Strictly speaking, the accusation reads accusation of pregnancy termination of an especially serious nature according to § 218 StGB. But to write something lik this wouldn’t have been politically correct. In the feminist view, any pregnant woman has the right to “terminate” the life of her unborn child

PI articles about the subject:

» Baby Boxer Gets 2 Years and 9 Months
» Unborn Child Punched to Death: Trial Starts Tomorrow
» Muslim verprügelt schwangere Ehefrau in Rheine

Posted by PI / Translation: Anders Denken

(By Thorsten M.)

Since its founding in 1958, the Putzmeister firm has been a genuine institution in its market for decades. With a concrete pump that overcame a height difference of 310 meters in the building of the Frankfurt telecommunications tower, for example, Putzmeister was able to achieve a world record for the first time 35 years ago.

Of course there is no lack of conciliatory words from the PR divisions of the two great international concrete pump producers: Putzmeister will keep a great degree of enterprising freedom, and business manager Norbert Scheuch will even be installed on the committee at Sany. Therefore, no danger for the 2,600 well-paid jobs primarily in Germany, right? After harsh restructurings, Putzmeister, in the meantime, has somewhat escaped the 2008 crisis, and therefore pay its high German salaries and wages. There is the corresponding pressure to transfer whole divisions and production branches immediately to China, certainly not everything, as much as it is with insolvent firms. To date, these have been the only acquisition candidates for which the Chinese have been drawn to Germany.

However, all statements aside, one shouldn’t be too naïve with regard to the motives of the Chinese. If the Schlecht family owners at this point don’t feel responsible for their 2,600 colleagues, among whom are several hundred integrated immigrants, often through the employment market, then the Chinese will do much less. Putzmeister has lost a considerable amount of terroritory in the past years to Sany. The Chinese therefore are interested, during the interim period, more in patents and development engineers, but much less in the expensive production capacities here. In addition, there is a high sales price – presumably a three-digit million sales price – which will require its refinancing via production cost savings. The Chinese finance investor Citic PE Advisors will take care of this by securing the deal via a minority investment. Accordingly, Putzmeister, over the long term, will in essence become a distribution and service location for the European market.

And that is no less than the axe being put to our prosperity. Germany today lives from several hundred such “hidden champions” as Putzmeister that in the last 30 years have been able, from classical production branches like consumer electronics, textile and shoe industries, to compensate with well-paid jobs. This is the only way, and in many other areas as well, that a reasonably attractive wage level has been able to persist in a land poor in raw materials.

Not only has China been allowed an entrance into Putzmeister, but into any of these niche companies as well, in order to “crack” these German leaders in the international market or niche providers. A gigantic, hungry, inherently domestic market tied with yet 80-90% less costly work forces, and a disciplined and willing to learn population, are ideal starting positions that will also succeed in this venture. And whoever loses their nerves because of this background – as apparently the Putzmeister owners did – will be readily swallowed up, as long as it is still valuable, and then sooner or later be eviscerated. This accelerates this process (of displacement) considerably.

However, it must be clear to us: If this great hunt for the rest of Germany’s publicly traded firms is well underway, then there are no new markets where Germany and Europe can flee, like after the decline of the consumer goods industry. Renewable energy sources have been nourished with a three-digit milliard (Amer. ‘billion’) figure, for example, in Germany, with the hope of also using this to open Germany up to new opportunities in the international market. With melting subsidies, it is now recognizable that the German providers of high wages are unable to produce significant advances in development. Cost-leader China is already hastily scooping aside the great German advantage in the world market again. Moreover, other high-tech branches with notable know-how, like the nuclear industry, for example, are abandoning our land due to hostility from green technology against them.

The process of adaptation that will step into action through this will certainly cause increasing wages in China. Above all, though, we will pay the price in international buying power, and perhaps lose millions of well-paid jobs, or have them converted into poorly paying jobs. Social unrests will not – mildly speaking – remain absent in a population that consists more and more of parallel societies. However, families like the Schlechts will hardly be involved in a degree worth mentioning with the consequential costs of this unsocial (ownership required!) sell-off, which is partly out of familial laziness and partly due to cowardice. They will watch – probably from Switzerland – while the Chinese topple us as a society, firm by firm, times the dozens, times the hundreds of immigrants. Not to mention the home-grown citizens reaching quickly into the thousands. Those in the 50s and 60s who screamed the loudest that we need “guest workers” will be totally silent. It is scandalous that not only our managers but also our family entrepreneurs, for reasons clear to any economist, do not advocate the stopping of mass immigration in Germany – more than ever from foreign cultural areas – at least for the future.

Posted by PI / Translation: Anders Denken

(By Jim Panse, PI Münster)

They didn’t behave themselves very well there. They got drunk on whisky and mobbed squaws, stole horses, insulted the indians as “dirty redskins,” etc.

The indians complained about the settlers. They demanded that the US Cavalry come to take their people back, since they had illegally immigrated there.

But a couple of young tribe members saw it differently. They said “no person is illegal” and accused their tribe of the same behavior as the whites.

They said that the indians should rather have extended a cordial welcome to the whites and hot have discriminated against them as palefaces.

The whites thought the same. Moreover, they asked to “have a part” in the tribal area and the young indians gave them many buffalo.

A few of the older indians thought the younger brothers had drunk too much fire water! However these young men taught their tribe that it would be better to integrate the whites by offering them the opportunity, for example, of becoming a medicine man. And even a white chief some day could be imaginable.

The rest of the indian history is well-known…

Guest Article posted by PI / Translation: Anders Denken

Posted by PI / Translation: Anders Denken

(By Michael Stürzenberger)

Various Swiss newspapers are reporting about the end of the ecclesiastical “investigation.” 20-Minuten Online, for example, adorned the story with the headline “Pastor To Keep Distance From Agitation Blog.” The synodal council, after ongoing investigations gave the decree: Hands away from PI. Even though her articles there most obviously produced nothing that could be objectionable:

The investigation resulted in no proof of islamophobic statements or writings by the pastor from Siselen-Finsterhennen, the synodal council recorded. No “hate sermons” were recognized, and the agitant expressions for which she was charged did not come from her.

But yet, she is supposed to stay away from PI, since “degrading and agitating articles” can be read there. At the end of the Inquisition, she bravely promised the following according to 20-Minuten Online (whether she had already been put on the rack wasn’t mentioned):

She stood positively in favor of dialog with an enlightened Islam.

The fable of the legendary “enlightened” Islam – also readily called “Euro-”islam – exists only as long as Muslims are in the minority. Anyone who has even a beginning in dealing with this ideology knows that. When positions of power are finally achieved, then the complete program of the Quran is employed. Anything else would mean blasphemy and apostasy. It is a tragedy that such a knowledgeable, well-read and likeable critic of Islam could be rendered invalid. That’s life in 2012.

“Whose bread I eat, his song I sing,” is how things are. What is left to do when someone is threatened with their existence? As for Islam, we have already long lived under lack of any democratic conditions. These unbearable measures of censorship and reeducation are all precursors of coming religious dictatorship, the full force of which our children and grandchildren will suffer.

The fact that 20-Minuten Online likes at times to fashion its own truths together can be recognized even from the article’s photo series where several factual errors can be seen right away. Fine that Christian Jung and Marco Pino are no longer with the FREEDOM party, but more than likely it still hasn’t been talked about much around Switzerland. But the fact that I was kicked out of the CSU for “islamophobia,” is something new to me. I always thought I had declared my departure in writing on May 25, 2011, so that I could candidate on June 4th for a post on the Bavarian regional FREEDOM committee. But perhaps somebody in the 20-Minuten Online editorial office knew better. And without asking at the branch office of the Munich CSU, as journalists who are interested in objective reporting should actually do.

Der Bund in Bern also reports about the subject: “Seeland Pastor Keeps Hand Away From Agitation Blog“:

The synodal council concludes in their investigation that the controversial Seeland pastor has improved her ways.

“Improved.” Isn’t that nicely formulated. The main thing is that the pastor no longer write anything negative about Islam. Hardly worth talking about is the fact that annually 160,000 Christians are murdered in islamic countries, and around 100 million are being persecuted or discriminated against. It is much more important that a pastor “improve” her ways.

If every critic of Islam had such rigid employers as Christine Dietrich, then we could just hand over the keys to the local imams in a couple of decades. And the Swiss church rulers would be able to turn their churches into mosques and their towers into minarets. My compassion in such a case would be held in serious check because the butchers themselves are paying courtship to only the stupidest of calves.

Posted by byzanz on PI / Translation: Anders Denken

(By PI Munich)

The Turkish author Zafer Senocak, who has dealt in extensively with Islam, summed it up in a clear and unmistakable way in his detailed article “Terror comes from the heart of Islam” at Welt Online:

“Even when most Muslims don’t want to admit it, terror comes from the heart of Islam; it comes right out of the Quran. It is oriented against everyone who doesn’t live and behave according to the rules of the Quran, thus against democrats, Western-inspired thinkers and scholars, against agnostics and atheists. It is especially oriented against women. It is the handiwork of a male-centric Islam, one that would exert all power possible to prevent women from being equal and finding an end to their centuries-long subjugation.”

The ageless relevance of the Quran, the immense consequences of its contents and its disastrous implication for us “infidels” can’t be the subject of discussion often enough. PI Munich, therefore, has prepared an analysis about this titled “The Quran – The World’s Most Dangerous Book. Here are a few excerpts from it:

This book is grossly underestimated in the Western world. But it is not just any book: it is the Holy Book of all Muslims. For them, every word in it comes directly from the god Allah:

“The sending down of this book is doubtlessly from the lord of the worlds” (32:2)

The Quran is full of guidelines and commands. They are clearly formulated and, according to Islamic opinion, ageless as well as unalterable:

“This is with all certainty the book of Allah, that gives no reason for doubt; it is a proper guide for the devout.” (2:2)

This religion has easy to understand, simple principles: Muhammad is the last of the prophets, for Muslims the “perfect person” and their “perfect example.” He received every instruction from Allah through the angel Gabriel. Islam means submission, and thus all believers must submit themselves to Allah’s will. Any form of criticism or contradiction is uncompromisingly prohibited:

“This happens because they resist Allah and his emissary; and those who resist Allah – truly Allah is strict in punishment.” (59:4)

Muslims must recognize the teachings which Muhammad used to influence his compatriots in the Arab bedouin society as universally applicable. His god Allah intends that belief in him be enforced against all other religions. And in a militant way, to be sure:

“It is He who sent his emissary with leading and the true religion so that He will cause it to be the victor over every other religion. And Allah is witness enough.” (48:28)

Therefore, a battle follows, willed by God against Christians, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists and others, that has already caused 270 million deaths, according to estimates by the Shoebat Institute. This god Allah, in all seriousness, wants the battle to the ultimate victory against his own creatures:

“Allah has commanded it: Of a certainty, I will win, I and my emissary. Truly, Allah is strong and mighty.” (58:21)

Islam is also supposed to seize international authority, which makes a separation of state and religion impossible:

“To Allah belongs the lordship over heaven and earth. Allah has the authority over all.” (3:189)

This god leaves no question about his plans. Non-believers don’t need to have illusions about supposed tolerance or peacefulness:

“Allah will prove the devout and exterminate the infidels” (3:141)

Any person that doesn’t accept this idea of a threatening and battle-thirsty god is bullied:

“This is nothing other than an admonishment and a clear Qur’an in which he warns everyone alive and fulfills the word against the infidels.” (36:69)

It has been handed down through islamic history that Muhammad had many of his critics killed. This killing is not only allowed in the Quran, rather it is explicitly instructed. The word “kill (or ‘slay’)” appears 189 times in the Quran, 27 times in the imperative:

“And kill them wherever you happen upon them, and drive them out from the place where they have driven you out; for the deception of the infidels is worse than killing. However, do not fight them at the holy mosque unless they fight against you there. Attack them, however, and slay them dead. Such is the reward of the infidels.” (2:191)

Have you not wondered about the notorious assurances by Muslim representatives since 9/11 that Islam is a “peaceful religion” and that violence has “nothing to do with Islam”? Mohammed Atta and his co-believers acted, for example, according to the following verse in their airplane attacks in the US among others:

“Allah has redeemed the life and goods from the devout for Paradise: They battle for Allah’s cause; they kill and are killed” (9:11)

Such unmistakable instructions are learned in 40,000 Quran schools worldwide. In Germany, around one hundred thousand young Muslims are indoctrinated each year with such verses. It is to be feared that the breeding ground has been cultivated for future terrorist generations.

“And when the holy months are over, then kill the idol worshippers wherever you find them, and attack them and besiege them and lure them out with any trap. However, if they repent and carry out the prayer and pay the Zakah, then make the way free for them. Truly, Allah is all forgiving, merciful” (9:5)

These clear calls for killing apply for all time, and especially when Jihad is declared. Osama bin Laden, Al Qaeda, Taliban, Hamas, Hezbollah and other fanatical theocratic warriors are obedient pupils of their master Muhammad:

“When you meet the infidels, then off with the head, until you have wreaked a massacre among them; then tie the bonds. After this, do not demand grace or ransom until the war takes its burden from you. It is that way. And if Allah had willed, he could have done the extermination himself, but he wanted to test one of you through the others. And those who have fallen in the way of Allah – he will never nullify it.” (47:4)

Therefore, battling and Islam quite plainly belong inextricably together:

“It is commanded of you to fight, even if it is repulsive to you. However, it may be that the thing repulsive to you is that which is good for you; and it may be that the thing you like is bad for you. And Allah knows, but you do not know.” (2:216)

When infidels stand up against the warlike islamic expansion or criticize its ideology, monstrous punishment is thought out for them:

The reward of the one who feuds with Allah and his emissary and carries out corruption on the earth is that they will be killed or crucified, or that their hands and feet will be cut off in turns, or that they will be driven out of the country. It will be a disgrace for them in this world and in the afterlife a serious punishment will be meted out to them. (5:33)

Every warrior of god is instilled with the idea that in all his work he is constantly being monitored by his strict lord in heaven:

“And fight in Allah’s way and know that Allah hears all and is omniscient.” (2:244)

But not only is battle a duty in Islam, the goading of other believers into holy war is as well:

“Therefore battle for Allah’s sake – you will be held responsible for nobody but yourself – and encourage the believers to battle. Perhaps Allah will hold back the power of those who are unbelieving; and Allah’s power is much greater, and he is stricter in punishment.” (4:84)

This battle is also richly rewarded in which Muhammad plays down the meaning of terrestrial life, but emphasizes that of the afterlife:

“Therefore, let those fight for Allah’s sake, who sell the earthly life for the prize of the hereafter. And to the one who fights for Allah’s sake, whether he is killed or wins, we will give a great reward.” (4:74)

According to official islamic sources, Muhammad was involved in 89 military actions in the space of ten years. Thus, since its beginnings, Islam has been an ideology of perpetual battle to the end that there will be only Muslims in the world:

“And battle against them so that no more seduction can take place, and fight until all honor is given to Allah alone. Separate yourself, however, from the infidel, for truly, Allah sees very well what you do.” (8:39)

In the face of these perpetual war campaigns, Muhammad had to motivate his followers effectively. This was accomplished with the help of Allah:

“Oh prophet, stir the fires of battle within the believers. If there are only twenty among you that have patience, they shall overcome two hundred; and if there one hundred among you, they will overcome one thousand who do not believe, because they are a people who do not understand.” (8:65)

There is much of battle and killing in the Quran; talk of love, in contrast, appears only seldom – except for with brave warriors:

“Truly, Allah loves those who fight for his cause, arrayed in an order of battle as though they were entrenched stonework.” (61:4)

Scruples or a bad conscience in killing is removed from the Muslims – for it is really Allah himself killing through the hands of the devout:

“You did not kill them, rather Allah has killed them. And you have not thrown as you have thrown, but Allah threw, and through that he causes the devout to undergo a beautiful test from him. Surely, Allah is all hearing and all knowing.” (8:17)

The most dangerous thing about the islamic ideology of violence is the absence of the fear of death. For the god of the Muslims rewards all who die in battle:

“And truly, if you are slain or die in the way of Allah, truly, Allah’s forgiveness and mercy is better than that which you scrape together. And if you die or are slain, you will be gathered together before Allah.” (3:157)

Muhammad recognized that the fighting power of his companions was considerably greater with a contempt for death than with a fear of death:

“And do not consider those as dead who have fallen in Allah’s way. No! They live with their lord, and there they are cared for.” (3:169)

Fallen warriors also receive a remission of sins with Allah and are taken directly to Paradise. This separates them from all other Muslims who do not know for sure whether they will enter Paradise.

“And those who migrated away and were driven out of their houses and suffered in my way and fought and fell – truly, I will wipe away all their misdeeds, and truly, I will lead them into gardens where the brooks hasten by, as a reward from Allah. And with Allah is the best reward.” (3:195)

Muslims are instructed in the Quran to wage battle without compromise as soon as they find themselves in a promising position.

“Truly those who are infidels and turn away from Allah’s way, and then die as infidels – Allah will in no wise pardon them. Therefore, do not diminish the battle and do not call for a cease-fire where you have the upper hand. And Allah is with you, and he will not diminish your deeds.” (47:34)

This warlike prophet sees himself as the inexorable pioneer employed by his god Allah in the slaughter of the “infidels”:

“It doesn’t befit a prophet to make prisoners until he slaughters on earth. You desire this world’s goods, but Allah desires the afterlife for you. And Allah is mighty and wise.” (8:67)

All “infidels” are dedicated to destruction according to the Quran:

“But those who are unbelieving – down with them! He causes their works to fail. It is this way because they hate him whom Allah has sent; therefore he brings their works to nought.” (47:8)

Muhammad demands uncompromised battle with a contempt for death from his followers, and for this he promises them Paradise in the afterlife:

“However, the Sent One and the devout ones with him who fight with their goods and their blood are the ones on whom good will be bestowed; and they are the ones who will have success. Allah has prepared gardens for them through which brooks flow; there they are to spend eternity. That is the greatest bliss.” (9:88)

Allah cares for his warriors after the death of battle:

“And for those who migrate away for Allah’s will and then are slain or die, Allah will prepare a splendid provision. Truly, Allah – he is the best provider.” (22:58)

But in Paradise, not only worldly goods await the devout. Muhammad knew how to entice his warriors with sexual temptations:

“… and we will wed them with virgins. They will desire fruits of all kinds there and live in security. Death they will not taste there except for the first death. And he will keep them from the punishment of the Jahim as a grace from their lord. That is the greatest bliss. (44:51)

Muhammad describes these virgins in the afterlife very vividly so that he can develop the desired effect among his warriors:

“Truly, there is gain for those that fear God: Gardens and berry hedges and girls with swelling breasts, companions and cups filled to overflowing.” (78:31)

In contrast to the enticing promise of Paradise, all “infidels” are threatened with the worst hell:

“…We have prepared a fire for the evil doers so that they will be enclosed as in a tent. And when they cry for help, they will be helped with water like molten metal that burns the faces. How terrible is the drink and how wicked their place of rest!” (18:29)

Muhammad’s fantasy knew no limits where it had to do with the deterring portrayal of suffering in hell:

“For those who are now unbelieving, their clothing will be singed by fire; boiling water will be poured over their heads so that what is in their bellies and their skin will melt. And iron clubs have been determined for them. As often as they try to escape the distress, they will be driven back to it; and that means: Taste the punishment of burning.” (22:19)

The prophet also promised earthly goods, which he very easily has taken away from the “infidels.” And thus, in the Quran there is a complete Sura that bears the name “The Spoils.” For himself, he secured a 20% commission:

“And know that whatever you may take as spoils, a fifth of that belongs to Allah and his emissary and the relatives and the orphans and those in need and the son of the way, if you believe in Allah and in that which we have sent down to our servant on the day of decision, the day when both hosts met together; and Allah has authority over all things.” (8:41)

So motivated, the Muslim armies were able to subdue the Arab peninsula in just a few years.

“Allah has promised much booty, which you will make, and he has given this quickly over to you and has held the hands of men from you so that this will be a sign for the devout, and that he will lead you on a straight path.” (48:20)

This way, Islam expanded with lighting speed in all directions because Allah promised rich spoils throughout:

“And another part of the spoils that you have failed to obtain, Allah has done so in his power. And Allah has power over all things.” (48:21)

The quickly growing armies were instructed to leave their homeland in order to carry the battle to other lands, and thus increase Islam’s dominion:

“Those that believe and migrate away, and fight with their goods and their blood for Allah’s sake receive the highest rank with Allah; and they are the ones who will overcome.” (9:20)

With such godly instructions in their baggage, the Muslim armies were able, even after Muhammad’s death in 632, to plow through unprecedentedly successful campaigns all the way to France.

“Move out, light and heavy, and fight with your goods and your blood for Allah’s sake! It is better for you, if you only knew it!” (9:41)

A disregard for this philosophy of expansion brings serious consequences with it:

“If you do not move out, he will punish you with painful punishment, and will choose another people in your place, and you will certainly will not be able to hurt him. And Allah has the power over all things.” (9:39)

Muhammad also convinced the Muslims of a superior position of exception, which principally means the justification for the takeover of power in any country:

“You are the best fellowship that has ever existed for the people. You will command that which is right and forbid the wrong, and you will believe in Allah. And if the people of the scriptures had believed, it would have been good for them! There are believers among you, but the majority of them are evil doers.” (3:110)

The “people of the scriptures” are Christians and Jews. Everyone among them who doesn’t believe in Allah are therefore evil doers. In the course of taking over power, the humiliation of those in other faiths is highest law:

“Humiliation is commanded for them wherever they are met, unless they would be secure because of their bond with Allah or with the people. And they draw to themselves the anger of Allah, and poverty is commanded for them because they denied Allah’s signs and unjustly murdered the prophets. Such a thing happens since they were rebellious and transgressors.” (3:112)

Every dissident thinker is warned about resistance:

“Truly, those that resist Allah and his emissary will certainly be humiliated, even as those who were humiliated before them; and truly, we have already sent clear signs down. And the infidel will be imparted with a shameful sign.” (58:5)

The principle of subjugation and demand for tribute can also be best recognized from the supposedly peaceful period of islamic government in Spain. For in “Al Andalus” relative quietness ruled when the Jews and Christians bowed to massive pressure, submitted themselves as second-class people, accepted considerably fewer rights and paid additional taxes.

“Fight against those who do not believe in Allah and in the last day, and those who do not declare forbidden what Allah and his emissary have declared forbidden, and those who do not follow the true faith – from those who have received the scriptures until they pay tribute from their own hand in complete submission.” (9:29)

Mercy exists in Islam only among one another in the Umma, the fellowship of Muslims. Infidels, on the other hand, deserve harsher forms of handling:

“Muhammad is the emissary of Allah. And those who are with him are harsh against the infidels, but merciful to each other. You see them bow in prayer, prostrate themselves and strive for Allah’s grace and favor. Their character can be seen in their faces: the signs of prostration.” (48:29)

The one who resists Islam is threatened with the worst punishment. Long-term pPeaceful coexistence with such an ideology is impossible.

“The lord instructed his angels: “I am with you; therefore, strengthen the believers. Into the hearts of the unbelievers I will cast fear. Therefore, slit their throats and strike every finger off from them!” (8:12)

Europe has defended itself successfully throughout the centuries against the islamic attempts of invasion: 732 Poitiers, 1529 Vienna, 1571 Lepanto and 1683 Vienna yet again. Islam has never belonged in Europe, but it has constantly wanted to conquer it. It didn’t work militarily, so now they are attempting to do so by stealth. Thus it behooves every European with common sense to make the statement: Islam, at least in its 1400 year old empirically comprehensible from, should also not be allowed in Europe!

Dutch politician Geert Wilders says the following about this:

“Islam is not a religion but an ideology that labels itself through murder and killing. We Europeans have the duty to resist it.”

If the islamic associations and organizations in Europa do not distance themselves in an obliglatory way from the Sharia, the verses in the Quran that legitimize violence and killing, from the discrimination against those of other faiths, from the oppression of women and from the sole claim to world power, then there is the threat, considering developments in demographics, of the complete islamization of the continent within few decades.

The original German article of this Quran analysis can be found here.

PI Munich is in the process of working on the production of a video, which is extremely time consuming, about the world’s most dangerous book. If you would like to support Michael Stürzenberger’s volunteer educational and informational work, you can do so through the bank connection listed below:

Deutsche Kreditbank
Michael Stürzenberger
Account Number: 1014947137
Bank Routing Number: 120 300 00

Posted by byzanz on PI / Translation: Anders Denken

“country that prizes multiculturalism.”

or so the article says.

The article mentions some interesting facts about the accused. The father/husband was called a ‘polygamist.’ That he is accused of murdering his first wife and three daughters. The son who is 20 years old and the father’s second wife, who is the mother of the three girls that were killed, are also up on these four counts of murder.

Also interesting, is that the article continues on about honor killings elsewhere, as well as other crimes committed by members of The Religion of Peace™.

This among others should be another eye-opener for those on the western rim of the Atlantic Ocean.

Posted by Anders Denken

Posted by byzanz on PI / Translation: Anders Denken