The FREEDOM rally last Saturday in Munich-Neuperlach demonstrated how immense a danger is subject to if the islamization of Germany continues to advance unabated and is rather encouraged by politics, media, churches, unions and social organizations. Moslems of a Munich township where they make up a considerable portion are exercising massive pressure in order to put a stop to criticism of Islam in the public. Not just through noises, shouts, ear-deafening whistles, but also through the administration of violence: In spite of a large police presence, three eggs were thrown at us; all three hit us. In the head, neck and back. They continued to throw eggs. When will knives fly? And bombs? Saturday showed that we have almost come too late with our attempts to take Islam’s violence away from it.

(By Michael Stürzenberger)

In the first video a long-bearded Moslem can be seen holding up a sign with the writing “islamophobia” on it. When I explained that Ayatollah Khomeini invented this battle term in order to stop criticism of Islam, that when the first things began to fly at us. It was still bunches of paper…

It’s interesting to observe how several Moslems behaved at this rally: demanding, audacious, insulting, bad-mounthing and very aggressively:

Criticism of Islam is not allowed and is not discussed objectively, rather it is considered to be a personal insult:

One Moslem says that Islam will win in Germany by democracy:

In the next video, the background noise becomes gradually unbearable because several Moslems were making shrill whistles in the meantime. They whistled so ear-deafeningly loud that they themselves put earplugs in. The squad leader of the police, by the way, did nothing to make this noise more bearable, much the opposite: He ran all over with his decibel device in order to reduce the volume of our megaphones! Parts of the Moslem audience, by the way, advocated the islamic plans of terror attacks that have already often happened in Germany. Even Al Qaeda was praised and celebrated with “Allahu akbar” shouts.

They then chatted about the kicking of Daniel Siefert in the head until he died and of Jonny K by the Turks:

Finally, two eggs flew: One hit a coworker in the neck, one hit me in the back:

It’s almost needless to mention that I was also spat on this day, which can be seen in the next video. Also one of the typical Moslem taqiyya lies is in it: “Al Qaeda has nothing to do with Islam, but was invented by the Americans”:

.

After the rally, we were “accompanied” on the way to the parking garage by some 20 Moslems and a flying egg hit me in the head. By the way, the left-wing extremists acknowledged this dangerous throwing of eggs with mocking songs: “A chicken, an egg, the Chicken Party.” Repulsive, violence glorifying, misanthropic, mean – that’s just how many left-wing extremists tick:

Upon hearing the report about the islamization of Turkey and the killing of Christians there, Moslems shouted “Allahu akbar.” The well-known best fed left-wing extremist in the first row grinned widely when I told about the killing of three Jewish children in France by an Algerian Moslem. By the way, their father called out at our rally in the Munich shopping zone on March 23rd because of our Israel flags:

“Germans, defend yourselves, don’t buy from Jews!”

The Süddeutsche Zeitung (SZ) untruthfully and out of total spite attributed this repulsive Nazi slogan to a participant in our rally so that they could kick us into right-wing extremist tub. Even after communication of the facts and the confirmation by the public relations office of the Munich police presidium, the political war propagandists of the SZ kept it online for weeks. We had to haul them into court before they finally got rid of this rotten lie.

After five years of massively direct experiences, it is becoming clear to us that we are in now way dealing with a peaceful, tolerant and democratically minded majority of Moslems. As soon as they are confronted with critique of Islam, most of them become aggressive and let the mask fall. May God have mercy on us if they should ever be in the majority. Hardly one of them would ever stand against the call to jihad because then they would be standing against peer pressure and draw to themselves Allah’s anger, which would then be implemented without hesitation by the devout ones. Anyone knows that this then means acute danger to life. And the development of this chaos is also still being supported by the leading heads of our society at the moment. A replacement of these “politically correct” deniers of reality by a new generation of citizens who are intellectually fresh, non-ideological and directed by common sense is urgently needed.

PS: In spite of being hemmed in and strong attempts at intimidation by the unholy alliance of Moslems/left-wing extremists, 270 Munich citizens signed the petition Saturday.

Posted by byzanz on PI / Translation: Anders Denken

Posted on PI / Translation: Anders Denken

In Stockholm, arson was brought about last night (5/19) by Moslem immigrants. In the township of Husby where primarily immigrants from islamic countries live, more than 100 automobiles were burned out. Several people had to be evacuated. The Russian news agency RIA Novosti speaks in this context of pogroms having played out in Husby. Prior to this there was the shooting of an elderly Moslem who allegedly threatened police officers with a machete.

Ria Novosti writes:

Around 100 automobiles were burned during unrest in the night before Monday north of Stockholm. The pogroms, which began on Saturday evening followed clashes with the police. The cause for the unrest was allegedly the death of a resident of the Stockholm township Husby, which is primarily inhabited by immigrants. On May 14th, police officers shot a 69-year-old who threatened them with a machete. According to police statements, 50 to 60 young people took part in the pogroms. They ignited autos that were parked on the street as well as those that stood in a garage. Because of the fire, some 50 people had to be brought to safety. When the police arrived on site, the young people attacked them with rocks. Three police officers were injured. The riots ended on Monday around 5:30 a.m. None of the participants were taken into custody. According to the social organization “Megafonen,” which represents the interests of the residents of Stockholm’s northern suburb, the pogroms were a reaction to the brutal proceedings by the police against the city’s residents.

As yet, German-speaking media haven’t reported anything. The Moslem immigrants are known to have been brought to the country by the Swedish social democrats. Now they are reaping the fruit of their irresponsible actions:

Posted by PI / Translation: Anders Denken

On Thursday evening, the yearly Reception of the Munich Regional Evangelical-Lutheran Clergy in the conference hall of the old city hall building. Right in the middle of it: Imam Bajrambejamin Idriz who was by all appearances ensnared by the innermost of the “protestants.” The betrayal of Christianity and of Christians persecuted by Islam worldwide by the Evangelical Church is moving forward unrestrained. Besides State Bishop Heinrich Bedford-Strohm (left) and City Reverend Barbara Kittelberg, Abi Pitum (right) of the Israeli Cultural Association appears to feel very well in this company. The caption by the Merkur: “Encounter at eye level.” The “agitation” of the FREEDOM Party “against islamic citizens” was to be a central issue at the reception, if today’s article by the Münchner Merkur can be given any credibility.

(By Michael Stürzenberger)

It is already interesting: Representatives of the Evangelical Church and the Israeli Cultural Association are meeting, “at eye level,” with an imam under surveillance by Constitutional Defense who also is alleged still to have contactsw with a Bosnian terror group. Then the members of the Bavarian FREEDOM Party and Munich PI don’t find themselves at eye level because we are only now being monitored, where Idriz and his Penzberg Islamic Association on the other hand have already held a solid place for three years in the Constitutional Defense Report. The following can be read about the spooky meeting under the evil-foreboding headline “Clear Confession of Tolerance”:

There is no place for right-wing populist activities and agitation against citizens in the Evangelical Church. Munich City Reverend Barbara Kittelberger emphasized this at the annual reception of the clergy and thereby addressed the “Die Freiheit (Freeedom)” minority party. “Tolerance” is this years theme of the so-called Luther Decade that is to lead to the 500th anniversary of the start of the Reformation coming up in 2017. One of the many faces of tolerance, Kittelberger elaborated before several hundred guests in the old conference hall, is the act of getting involved for democracy. The City Reverend said in so many words under applause from guests from all areas of public life:

“As part of a democratic alliance supported by all parties, we as the Evangelical Church say no to right-wing populism in the form of the ‘Freedom’ Party who stirs up agitation against Muslim citizens under the cloak of democracy, demonizes Islam and warns of an all-destroying islamization.”

As a “height of contempt and abuse of the Resistance during the time of the National Socialist dictatorship,” the City Reverend denounced the fact that “Freedom” state president Michael Stürzenberger makes use of the elderly Susanne Zeller-Hirzel, erstwhile member of the student resistance group White Rose, in order to portray himself and his party as resistance warriors. She was “dismayed at the contempt and lack of piety” toward the White Rose members murdered by the Nazis and their descendants, Kittelberger said.

The Reverend Kittelberger appears to be totally clueless about history, otherwise she would have know about the intensive collaboration between Islam and National Socialism whose leading representatives mutually confirm the similarity of their ideologies. Moslems of the Handschar Waffen-SS division killed under commission by both totalitarian systems. And with Idriz, Kittelberger has a Moslem beside her who also still calls Waffen-SS military imam Husein Djozo one of his creepy Islam role models.

Disgrace and shame for such a city reverend who without criticism rolls out the red carpet for Islam and denounces, of all people, those who are undertaking the important labor of informing. But there have always been cowardly appeasers and collaborators in times of rising totalitarian systems. One like Kittelberger would never have been in the ranks of the White Rose resistance warriors, they would have shouted loudly with the mainstream mass. On the other hand, courageous White Rose member Susanne Zeller-Hirzel spoke unmistakeably with vim and vigor in an interview in October 2009:

“Fanaticism, the absolute claim to truth and mental simplicity are very similar to each other; as it is in Islam, so it is in National Socialism as well”

Further on in the text of the Merkur article, which is available only in print:

State Bishop Heinrich Bedford-Strohm was fundamental in his official speech about “reformation and tolerance”: Modern thought of tolerance, he admitted is not any invention of the Church, rather quite the opposite “arose out of the Enlightenment against the resistance of the churches.” Nevertheless, Martin Luther represented a Christian mentality that similarly formed a basis for civil courage like the responsibility for your neighbor.

Resting on the thoughts of philosopher Rainer Forst, the state bishop emphasized that tolerance is “more than leaving others alone.” It assumes the interests for others and their opinions, even when this opinion is not shared. Thus it demonstrates of a lack of tolerance when recognizing other religions “first and foremost in their fundamental perversenesss.”

Bedford-Strohm rebutted the argument that whoever battles against extremists is himself intolerant by pointing tot he limits of tolerance. The measuring stick that the bishop sets here is called human dignity. It must be defended, “wherever it is placed under question by means of programmed intolerance.” That is the case “when the recognition of a certain person’s dignity or of a group of people is fundamentally refused. There is no tolerance for the systematic violation of human dignity!”

Are you describing the totalitarian and intolerant system of Islam, Mr. Bedford-Strohm? Why don’t you mention the reason for the discrimination, persecution and killing of thousands of your fellow believers in islamic countries? Imam Idriz also has Turkish roots – has it once entered your mind to ask him why the oh so tolerant Islam in Turkey doesn’t allow new churches to be built, not one old church to be renovated and priests to be educated? Instead, you show yourself smiling with him in press photographs as though Moslems didn’t kill 100,000 Christians every year. Such a nauseating hypocrisy!

Why do you present it in complete reversal of reality as though those who spread information about Islam are “intolerant” with their such important work? Are you perhaps also such a pitiful hypocrite and double moralist who is chumming up with islamic representatives in this country because it is on a direct par with the Zeitgeist and irresponsibly fails to prompt those to put an immediate stop to the horrible persecution of Christians in their homelands?

Because the city also must not finance such, Bedford-Strohm demanded: “The NPD must be prohibited.” As a “sign of hope,” the highest representative of the Bavarian protestants made the assessment “that alliances for tolerance have risen up all over in Bavaria.” The fact that there are people “showing flags everywhere where right-wing radical slogans look for a public place,” is “an expression of great civilian maturity.”

Penzberg Imam Benjamin Idriz, visibly moved, noted the “clear message to society.” “I have felt like this is a clear confession for coexistence,” he said.

Idriz is stringing the Evangelical sheep along as long as he needs them. And they don’t at all appear to notice how he secretly laughs up his sleeve. These rare figures like the state bishop and the city reverend should at least once speak candidly about the rights of Christians in islamic countries as well as their persecution and mass killing instead of discharging this playful babbling about tolerance. The kind of laughable comedy going on here is no longer bearable. Definitely, only the Christians mistreated throughout the world cannot laugh about this.

The main thing is their feeding trough is full and manna is raining from heaven here, and so there is no need of wasting any thoughts about others who have it bad, right Mr. Bedford-Strohm and Mrs. Kittelberger? I am nauseated from so much hypocrisy. What kind of Christians are those who fawn over the members of the ideology of perpetrators and leave their own fellow believers in a lurch? How repulsive.

The Süddeutsche Zeitung wallows in the wash of tolerance and the oh so honorable and heroic engagement against those who inform about Islam in it’s obliging way:

The Evangelical Church in Munich has sharply criticized the right-wing populist ‘Freedom’ Party and announced an engaged resistance against their agitation in the city and region. At the Annual Reception of the Clerical District in the Old City Hall, Reverend Barbara Kittelberger said: ‘We say a clear No to right-wing populist propaganda in the form of parties like ‘Freedom’” who stir up agitation against Muslim citizens.’ It is especially disgraceful that the right-wing populists in Munich are now abusing the name of the resistance group ‘The White Rose.’

As was reported, Islam opponents founded a group called ‘New White Rose’ in order to warn of alleged dangers by Islam. This, as Reverend Kittelberger says, is an ‘abuse of victims’ of National Socialism and the real resistance warriors. The churches in Munich will ‘intervene together against right-wing populism and xenophobia.’ Also part of this is taking an unequivocal stand in the debate over a refugee home in Putzbrunn. ‘Our hometown is cosmopolitan and tolerant,’ the reverend said to applause from around 200 guests from politics and society.

The reverend also received support by State Bishop Heinrich Bedford-Strohm. He spoke about ‘reformation and tolerance’ and made it clear in this that ‘There is no tolerance for antisemitism and racism.’ He therefore called for an immediate prohibition of the NPD (‘It must not be financed any longer by public funds’). It is a sign of hope that the Bavarian Alliance for Tolerance is steadily growing and now numbers 47 organizations. Demonstrations in Würzburg or Munich demonstration that in Bavaria there is a ‘large citizen movement’ for tolerance, human dignity and democracy, Bedford-Strohm said.

He also called for an intense discussion with other faith communities: ‘Those who get involved for tolerance toward others must first have an interest in them. Tolerance is more than leaving the others alone,’ Bedford-Strohm said. He also indirectly defended the appearance of Penzberg Imam Benjamin Idriz at the St. Luke’s Church for which the pastor there, Beate Frankenberger, was harshly criticized by conservative Christians. ‘It is a lack of tolerance when we recognize other religions foremost in their fundamental perversenesss and thus simply overlook the perverseness of our own religion,’ said the bishop. Mayor Christine Stroble praised the engagement of the churches in the battle against xenophobia. ‘The most important thing that tolerance demands is civil courage against right-wing populist hate preachers,’ said Strobl.

Here is the complete SZ article “Church Battles Against Right-Wing Populists.” Those who would wish to impart remedial instruction to the Evangelical Church about the subjects of the White Rose, collaboration between Nazis & Islam, and the greatest religion of hate of all time can send their messages to:

» info@ekd.de

Contact address for State Bishop Heinrich Bedford-Strohm:

» Heinrich.Bedford-Strohm@elkb.de

And for City Reverend Barbara Kittelberger:

» dekanat-muc@elkb.de

P.S. I will soon publish my analysis of the Idriz sermon at the Evangelical St. Luke’s Church in Munich. It’s unbelievable how the imam liar has thrown the wool over the eyes of the Evangelical sheep. But they believe everything anyway since they ultimately want to believe this left-contorted dreamer.

Posted by byzanz on PI / Translation: Anders Denken

Above: “On very thin ice”: Opponents of Islam in front of city hall with a large portrait of SS-Reichsführer Himmler.” –Photo: AIDA

Even though Judge Dieter Madlindl decided on acquittal after three long days of trial, intensive hearings of witnesses, abundant examination of the evidence, a cogent plea by defense attorney Sascha Giller of the PWB Attorney Group and the passionate last words of the accused, District Attorney Preuss is appealing. He has already by total surprise requested an increase of the fine from 2000 euros to 3200 euros (40 euros/80 days). The Süddeutsche Zeitung reported online today that the district attorney’s office was referring, among other things, to a photo of the “Antifascist Information and Documentation Archive (AIDA), which Tobias Bezler shot at the Marienplatz (see above). Moreover, Himmler was presented “iconically” as one of the highest National Socialist (NS) representatives.

(By Michael Stürzenberger)

The SZ reports the following about the “Appeal in the Poster Dispute”:

The district attorney’s office will not accept the acquittal for Michael Stürzenberger and two of his compatriots from the scene of Islam opponents. At a rally in September 2011 and in a prior discussion, they employed a poster of SS-Reichsführer Heinrich Himmler. They wanted according to their own statements ‘explain’ that Islam is just as dangerous an ideology as National Socialism. The district court acquitted them of the accusation on Monday of having used unconstitutional symbols: The Himmler poster could be seen only seconds at the Marienplatz and such symbols as a swastika on the SS uniform weren’t really recognizable.

The district attorney is disputing this statement and thus referring, among other things, to a photo by the Antifascist Information and Documentation Archive (AIDA), which was reproduced Tuesday in the SZ. In addition, Himmler was portrayed ‘iconically’ as one of the highest NS representatives, the district attorney argues. Stürzenberger presented the poster before a TV team at a restaurant.

How quick the flow of information is between Tobias Bezler of AIDA, which has long been in the Bavarian Constitutional Defense Report as a left-wing extremist organization, the Süddeutsche Zeitung newspaper and the Munich district attorney is highly interesting. On Monday, acquittal in judgment, already on Tuesday a photo in the printed SZ article, and on Wednesday, the SZ is reporting about the district attorney’s appeal online. Here is Bezler lurking at the aforementioned demonstration at Munich’s Marienplatz on September 29, 2011.

Bezler gathers thousands of photos for such purposes, among other things, which he shoots tirelessly and quietly at the rallies.

Yesterday, Junge Freiheit was still reporting about the acquittal. The Münchner Merkur likewise already indicated a possible appeal by the district attorney in a sort of biased article, “Court acquits right-wing populist,”

One of the other defendants held the poster at Marienplatz, the other announced the demonstration. Their argumentation: We only wanted to warn of the fascistic elements of Islam. One of them has left the “Freedom” party in the meantime. “I have learned my lesson,” he said. The head of the meeting back then stated to the contrary that he “proudly” sits in the defendant’s chair – and reaped laughter from the audience where, besides Stürzenberger’s sympathizers, opponents of the anti-Islam movement were also found. Both camps were commenting constantly about the occurrence.

At the end, Judge Dieter Madlindl acquitted the defendants. The basis was above all the statement of the police officers who were on assignment at the demonstration: They made sure after a few seconds that the poster wouldn’t be shown anymore and were in agreement that passers had hardly noticed it up to that point. In addition, they didn’t confiscate the poster and didn’t take down the personal data of the men. “The officers recognized a distancing from National Socialism,” Madlindl said. One must also pay attention to the basic rights of free speech and assembly: “Their attitude toward Islam is their opinion.” The court cannot employ any “penal code for views.” The district attorney, who previously requested a 3200 euro fine per person is examining whether to appeal.

The statement of one of the defendants is reproduced in the wrong context, who actually did learn his “lesson” with reference to the showing of this kind of controversial poster, but not regarding the Islam-critical scene because good contact continues to exist. The exit from THE FREEDOM Party a half year ago is based on various details and is in no way irretractable. Sometimes, some time is needed for people to get themselves together for a big goal.

We, in any case, go to the appeal with head held high, with a confident feeling of doing the right thing, full of pride and with ZERO conscience of guilt – if necessary, to the Last Judgment. I emphatically pointed out in my last words before the judge that, among other things, it is our civil duty to protect our Jewish citizens in Germany against the quickly rising islamic hat of Jews. That very thing can be produced with warning in the public by the presentation of the intimate collaboration of Himmler, the organizer of the Holocaust, with highest representative of Islam at the time, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem.

This, however, apparently doesn’t interest the district attorney. Especially not the fact that two rabbis in Germany have already been stabbed by Moslems, one in Frankfurt, one in Berlin, fortunately not resulting in death. Also not the fact that in Berlin Jewish children are being bad-mouthed by Moslem schoolmates as “sh** Jew.” And Jews in large German cities don’t dare anymore to walk on streets with kippas and other visible Jewish symbols in light of the hate by Islam. Not to mention the fleeing of many Jews away from Moslem majorities in European cities to Israel. But there apparently is a hidden denounceable and acceptable hate of Jews by certain mostly left-wing oriented people.

It is unprecedented that the Munich district attorney’s office is showing such a stubbornness about wanting by all means to punish us. At the next opportunity, I will report about how this district attorney’s office is employing all methods that we put into motion because of the worst offenses by Moslems and leftists. On the flip side, our people are being burdened with heavy fines if we do the same. In Munich, the district attorney’s office is practicing a two-class system of justice!

Posted by byzanz on PI / Translation: Anders Denken

A case in the US currently shows the fact that from time to time it isn’t all that easy to distinguish between killing in the womb and after birth. Abortionist Kermit Gosnell (photo) was thus condemned for murder in three cases there. The court viewed the fact that Gosnell killed three already born children as proof. Investigators described the 72-year-old’s clinic as a “house of horrors” because of the conditions there.

Die “Welt” reports:

A 72-year-old doctor in the US state of Pennsylvania has been found guilty of the murder of three newborn babies. Hermit Gosnell, who was known as an abortionist, severed the cervical spine of the babies with scissors immediately after birth.

In the sentencing, the court in Philadelphia also held the man responsible for the death of a 41-year-old patient through an overdose of anaesthesia. She suffered a heart attack after she received the overdose.

The doctor was acquitted of the accusation of the murder of a fourth newborn, US media reported. Judge Jeffrey Minehart adjourned the court until Tuesday when consideration will be made regarding the degree of sentencing. Gosnell could face the death penalty.

According to eyewitnesses, Gosnell routinely carried out illegal abortions at his practice after the first 24 weeks pregnancy time period set in Pennsylvania law. The children had either moved in part, whined or breathed.

US media reported of abhorrent details during the trial. Such things as, the doctor kept body parts of fetuses in glass cases in his clinic, which was described as filthy. “In the basement, in a freezer, in cases, bags and plastic pitchers, there were the remnants of fetuses. It was a bone house for babies,” the report to the grand jury said. Uneducated personnel were employed as operation aides and anaesthetists, some of them still in school.

His practice was closed in 2011 after accusations about tranquilizers attracted the attention of investigators. Before this, he apparently hadn’t been inspected by the health authorities since 1993.

The district attorney accused Gosnell of consciously appealing to women on the fringe of society and taking advantage of their social need. His defense attorney argued that the doctor offered poor and uninsured an access to medical services.

The babies were not killed after birth but died by means of the increased concentration of abortifacients. Pro-life groups in the US referenced the Gosnell case to put the debate over late-term abortions back into motion.

Certainly, only a pitiful isolated case…

Posted by PI / Translation: Anders Denken

Courtroom A-225 of the Munich courthouse, on the second day of the Islam-Himler-poster trial was occupied to the last seat, and thus some of those interested had to take their place in the entryway. After four further hours of hearing witnesses, looking at the TV documentary “Sarrazin’s Germany,” the district attorney’s and defense’s final plea, and the last words of the accused, the judge announced his decision: acquittal. Thus, the very fairly led trial for the Islam informers had a good end.

Among the observers there also were, besides an editor from the Münchner Merkur newspaper, Bernd Kastner from the Süddeutsche Zeitung newspaper who followed both trial days and already posted his article “Trial against Stürzenberger – No punishment for Himmler poster” online. In it, he said that the “activist for the islamophobic scene used” the courtroom as “a political stage.”

The district court has acquitted Michael Stürzenberger and two of his cohorts of the charge of having used signs from unconstitutional organizations. The three activists of the islamophobic scene used a poster with a photo of Heinrich Himmler in a rally in September 2011, along with a quote from the SS Reichfuehrer that allegedly proved a proximity between the Nazis and Islam.

Officiating judge Rolf-Dieter Madlindl based the acquittal on the fact that Himmler had been shown only a few seconds at the Marienplatz before the police intervened. Officers who were asked as witnesses hadn’t, in addition, noticed any NS symbols like a swastika on Himmler’s SS uniform and were themselves uncertain of whether the presentation of the photo was punishable.

A prior meeting by the Stürzenberg group at a restaurant where the poster was discussed was a closed session. Stürzenberger was fortunate, the judge said, because a TV team actually filmed the poster but showed it in a critical context.

It was not decided by the court whether a Himmler photo was allowed to be showed publicly. In any case, the judge said, Himmler was not portrayed “in an iconic fashion” like district attorney Peter Preuss saw. He asked for 80-day fines for all three defendants and emphasized the taboo with which NS (National Socialist) symbols are associated in Germany in order to keep them out of the political debate. In this case, Himmler’s picture was “instrumentalized” for political purposes. Stürzenberger is director of the state chapter of the “Freedom” Party. Both have been classified by Constitutional Defense as extremist for their islamophobia.

Stürzenberger on the second trial day also used the courtroom as a political stage and expressed himself with a fury similar to his appearances on the street: There is simply the desire of informing about the dangers of Islam, which is a totalitarian ideology similar to National Socialism.

He again held up large photos against his chest and turned himself constantly toward the public, sometimes he addressed political opponents sitting there. One time, the judge interrupted him (“You are not to hold public speeches here.”), but Stürzenberger wouldn’t be stopped and shouted: “All of you listen well!” At the end he was speaking with a balled up fist.

Judge Madlindl made it clear to the defendants that, in spite of the acquittal with the Himmler poster, they were treading on “very thin ice.” He suggested to them that they inquire with State Security or the district attorney about what is allowed. District attorney Preuss, however, contradicted the judge: “We are not allowed to do legal consultations.”

Those acquitted celebrate with some of their sympathizers and supporters:

The whole SZ article is here. Tomorrow, by the way, is the court trial for the SZ false report that a participant of a FREEDOM rally shouted in the Munich shopping zone “Germans protect yourselves, don’t buy Jewish.” However, this proved to be a leftist counter-demonstrator who now is being investigated for sedition, where to the contrary, Israel flags were being flown by the FREEDOM Party.

In conclusion, here is a fitting quote by Friedrich the Great:

“Truth needs neither weapons nor violence to defend itself in order to force people to believe in her. She only needs to appear, and as soon as her light has driven away the clouds that have hidden her, her victory is secure.”

Posted by PI / Translation: Anders Denken

The media is covering up, or at least ignoring, Islam’s direct role in the Boston Massacre by re-creating the myth of self-radicalization. This myth revolves around the idea that a Muslim who is peaceful, peace loving and a good citizen magically “self-radicalizes” and becomes a kafir killing machine. Muslims claim (and the media supports the view) that the Quran is a book of pure peace and that Islam is the religion of true peace and that Mohammed, whom Muslims claim was the most exemplary example of mankind ever created by God is, therefore, the prophet of peace.

Were this true, the Brothers Tsarnaev – the Muslims who committed this atrocity – should, after reading the Quran and following perfect example of the Sunna of Mohammed, have been “radicalized” to peace and love towards all men (and even women too). The hard fact that they set out to massacre members of their adopted society must, therefore, have nothing to do with Islam – “the religion of peace”(TM).

Faced with these “facts” the phenomenon of “self-radicalization” becomes a truly magical, supernatural and inexplicable event. Pundits and talking heads shake their sage locks in frank incomprehension and then proceed to speculate as to how these clearly deluded self-radicalizers were “let down” or “excluded” by the society they attacked.

But the question to ask is whether “self-radicalization” actually exists and, even if we allow that it does, whether it is entirely comprehensible if viewed in a different light and from a different perspective. To do so requires the deconstruction of the myth that underpins the myth of “self-radicalization”, the myth that Islam is a religion of peace.

The myth that Islam is a peaceful religion and Muslims are just like any other people is the greatest myth that’s ever been foisted on kafir societies. Yet it is always Muslims – and only Muslims, inspired by Islamic teachings, who commit senseless massacres of people in such an horrific manner. The following is just a mere fraction of the authoritative teachings of Islam. Teachings not of peace and love but of murder, terror and destruction.

Bukhari: 4852:220: “Allah’s Apostle (Prophet Muhammad) said, “I have been made victorious with terror”

Quran 3:151: “Soon shall We cast terror into the Hearts of the Unbelievers”

Quran 9:111: “Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain: a promise binding on Him in truth, through the Law, the Gospel, and the Qur’an: and who is more faithful to his covenant than Allah? then rejoice in the bargain which ye have concluded: that is the achievement supreme.”

Quran 9:5: “But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, an seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war); but if they repent, and establish regular prayers and practise regular charity, then open the way for them: for Allah is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful.”

Reading such verses and believing in them – and the many other similar verses found in the Koran, the supporting “sayings” of the hadith, the evidence of the Sirat, all of which the “good (or ‘true believer’) Muslim” must believe to be true (and seek to emulate) – does not amount to “self-radicalization”, the radicalization results precisely from reading and believing the Islamic Trilogy.

Thus, once we bust the myth of “the religion of Peace(TM)” we also bust the myth of self-radicalization. This should not come as a surprise – a myth, more accurately a fantasy, built on a myth is appallingly fragile if confronted by real facts, rather than ideas assumed to be facts.

The media will be talking about the culprits, the Tsarnev brothers from Chechnya, as “misunderstanding Islam”, or “hijacking Islam” or “self-radicalizers”. Indeed, CNN is already talking about how these Boston Massacre Muslim killers were “self-radicalized”. How they came to the USA and then became unhappy because they had no US friends. One of the brothers, Dzhokhar, stated on facebook: “he did not understand Americans”. And then they became self-radicalized ex nihilo (from nothing) and decided to murder Americans, who had offered them refuge from Russian persecution. (What a puzzling and magical process, no wonder CNN does not “get” it!)

This is the same sort of dribble that the media posted after Faisal Shahzad attempted to blow up a car bomb in Times Square. The politically correct dribble that was put out by the media and political elites that Shahzad had emigrated to the US from Pakistan, failed to realize the American dream, lost his home to bank foreclosure and therefore became a radicalized jihadist.

We are now learning and will be inundated day in and day out with the Brothers’ entire life story. This white washing process has already begun by the New York Times calling them good students and athletics. Just good boys just trying to fit in.

Forget the real victims (those injured and maimed by their bombs) many of whom will be living in constant pain and without limbs. Now is the time of the Brothers Tsarnaev.

They are now folk heroes to the Muslim Ummah on the scale of Osama bin Laden and will be portrayed to us as “victims”. Don’t think otherwise, it’s already started. The questions will be asked – what did we do that caused them to do these acts? Or How did we as a society fail them? There won’t be any discussion whatsoever that the Quran is a manual of war, death and destruction. That is the reality surrounding Islam in our world.

What the media will be hiding is the fact that “self-radicalization” doesn’t happen out of nothing. It happens thanks to Islam. It is the Quran and the rest of the Islamic Trilogy, that form a manual for terrorism, that radicalizes Muslims and turns them into killing machines.

Killing the infidels is a divine duty for Muslims, says the Quran (2:217, 9/111). The Brothers Tsarnaev read this and the thousands of teachings from the Quran and Sunna (hadith and Sirat) of Allah ordering Muslims to murder, terrorize and slaughter kafirs – and being genuinely good Muslims they went out and killed, murdered, and slaughtered kafirs.

In the Islamic view, Tamerlan Tsarnaev – the brother who was killed – is now in Paradise molesting his 72 virgins. His seriously wounded brother Dzhokhar will join him when he dies. The 3 murdered kafirs are in hell and damnation – their great criminal act was to be born kafirs and it was an act of piety for the Brothers Tsarnaev to kill them.

The reality of Islam is that however hard we try and succeed in foiling terrorist plots, they will eventually succeed in causing massacre and mayhem, just because the Quran-inspired radical Muslims see it as a holy duty and they are relentless in perpetrating the same. They have to “get lucky” just once to succeed – as they did in Boston.

The Media are going to inundate us with touching stories of Tsarnev brothers and how it went all wrong, thanks probably to real culprit America.

Let us, however, take a look at the Islamic views of these brothers.

Tamerlan Tsarnaev: “I’m very religious.” Tamerlan says he doesn’t drink or smoke anymore: “God said no alcohol”. He says: “There are no values anymore”, and worries that “people can’t control themselves”.

Boston bombing brother’s YouTube page features videos by Sheikh Feiz Mohammed who left Australia in 2005 to live in his father’s homeland, Lebanon, has a youth movement of 4,000. He called on Muslims to kill the enemies of Islam and exhorts his followers to seek the honorable death of the believer, quoting from narrations about the prophet Mohammed: “They fight in the cause, they kill others – the enemies who fight Islam and they themselves are killed as martyrs,” he said. He gives the example of a mujaheddin who fought in Bosnia in the 1990s who spoke of nothing but jihad and was killed on the battlefield. “What a beautiful person to be associated with. Would you not like to be an associate of this person?”

The Tsarnaev brothers are obviously devout Muslims and they were only following in the footsteps of Prophet Muhammad, obeying exactly the Quran, Allah’s and Mohammed’s teachings to murder the infidels – and of course to abstain from alcohol.

Muslim Platitudes: Muslims Are The “true victims” of the Boston Bombing.

Just as after the 9/11 attacks, we are now being inundated by main stream media elites with phony platitudes from Muslim leaders and organizations claiming revulsion of this massacre and in the next breath warning us all to watch out for an anti-Muslim “backlash”.

CAIR spokesman Ibrahim Hooper says, it’s unfortunate that “Muslims are often instantly considered suspects in such attacks.” [Care to speculate why, Mr Hooper?] “American Muslims, like Americans of all backgrounds, condemn in the strongest possible terms today’s cowardly bomb attack on participants and spectators of the Boston Marathon,” said its national executive director Nihad Awad. “We urge people of all faiths to pray for the victims and their loved ones and for the speedy recovery of those injured. We also call for the swift apprehension and punishment of the perpetrators.”

The Muslim Public Affairs Council also issued a statement condemning the blast. “This is a horrible crime, and we call on all of us as Americans to work together to bring those responsible to justice,” it said. To attack people on what is supposed to be a day of jubilation is “criminal and inexcusable. This is a time for us to show resilience and calmness, as we come together to help the American public recover from this heinous act,” said Salam Al-Marayati, MPAC president. “Terrorism has no faith so it is irrelevant what the culprit… will claim as his affiliation. What is relevant is the crime of terrorism, which we as Muslims have been speaking out against. We have confidence in our country, the United States of America, to maintain its tradition of protecting minorities and all people subjected to hate or persecution.”

No Islamist or other link has yet been confirmed. But Sahar Aziz of the Institute for Social Policy and Understanding (ISPU) thinktank, said Muslims should be wary. “Because the stereotype of Muslims as terrorists and disloyal has become entrenched within American culture, there is a strong likelihood that Muslims in America will face a backlash if the suspect… is a Muslim. …Such backlash could take the form of hate crimes, mosque vandalization, evictions off of airplanes, school bullying, and scapegoating in certain media outlets,” she told AFP.

In the midst of all these platitudes of American Muslim leaders and organizations, what Americans should also pay heed to is what Abu Hamza al-Masri, Egyptian born British Cleric, says about us:

“Killing a Kafir who is fighting you is OK. Killing a Kafir for any reason, you can say, it is OK – even if there is no reason for it. You can poison, ambush and kill non-believers. You must have a stand with your heart, with your tongue, with your money, with your hand, with your sword, with your Kalashnikov. Don’t ask shall I do this, just do it.”

No doubt many would regard al-Masri as a “radical” or even a nut-job; but the question arises: from whence do his ideas come. Al-Masri at any rate is sure, his ideas (according to him) come from Islam.

We will be flooded with inter-faith ceremonies with Muslim Imams proclaiming their great sorrow for all the poor murdered and injured kafirs (whom Islam regards as vile sub-humans with absolutely no humanity and who are to be murdered, tortured, terrorized, enslaved, raped and whose souls are condemned to hell and damnation. For 691 morally depraved teachings, see Islam Reform.).

There are no kafirs in the Islamic paradise. There is no God for kafirs. Only the murderers of these Boston kafirs are guaranteed accession via Quran 9:111 to the “virgin delights of paradise”.

Of course, not one of the Muslim leaders mentioned above or any Imam will condemn any of those thousands of teachings.

What hypocrisy.

And shame on all those Christian ministers and Rabbis who stand with these Imams and representatives of killers and do not challenge them on what Islam actually says.

What of President Obama who’s support of Islam brought the Muslim Brotherhood into the very center of US government, whose policies gutted homeland security, whose Homeland Security allows Saudi students unfettered access to USA, who banned from the FBI and military training manuals all mention of terrorism and Islam. The President stated that “the future does not belong to those who denigrate prophet Muhammad”. The corollary being that the future only belongs to the Muslims. He is absolutely correct with regard to the murdered Bostonian kafirs. Their future ended at the hands of “prophet Muhammad”. By supporting Allah and his messenger – the mortal enemy of the United States, the President is equally responsible for this massacre.

SILENT MUSLIM MEN ARE EQUALLY GUILTY

THEY ALSO SERVE WHO ONLY STAND AND WATCH

We hear countless times that not all Muslims are terrorists – that only a mere handful are involved in these acts. But all those Muslim men who do not repudiate the thousands of Quranic and Hadith teachings ordering as “divine acts” terrorism and the mass murder of kafirs are accomplices to these heinous acts. All Muslim men have free will to denounce and walk away from Islam or, if they can’t do that, to unequivocally reject the violent anti-Kafir teachings it contains. All those that accept these teachings are also complicit – if “only” through accepting without challenge this evil preaching.

Quoting again – MPAC head Salam Al-Marayati said: “Terrorism has no faith so it is irrelevant what the culprit.. will claim as his affiliation…“

This is a lie. Islam is terrorism. Terrorism is the very essence of Islam. Terror is central to its ideology.

Quoting Sahar Aziz “Such backlash could take the form of hate crimes, mosque vandalization, evictions off of airplanes, school bullying, and scapegoating in certain media outlets.”

It’s ironically funny that, even after Americans have been killed and maimed, the worst “backlash” (something that has never truly happened) he envisions involves some vandalization and bullying. A real “backlash”, which I pray will never happen, would look like the ongoing Sunni-Shia fratricide that “graces” (e.g.) Pakistan. The further irony is that Islam is the very epitome of hate crimes. The Quran is a book of hate that orders, as divine acts, hate crimes to be committed against kafirs. Allah is a god of pure hate. Muhammad was a psychotic “prophet” whose message was hate. See here and here.

Quoting Salam Al-Marayati again: “We have confidence in our country, the United States of America, to maintain its tradition of protecting minorities and all people subjected to hate or persecution.” Sadly, there was no one to protect the victims of the Boston massacre from the Islamic hate that exploded among them. The US government was not there to protect them. They were left totally defenseless as Muhammad stretched forth his hand from his grave in Mecca to murder and maim. It seems that our focus on protecting minority rights (a good and proper duty for a freedom-loving state) has become excessive to the point where the majority is left unprotected from a vicious and violent minority.

All the Muslim leaders quoted above understand Islam. They are all guilty of being accomplices to this act of mayhem, if only by association. The following is what Freedom of religion means to these leaders. Freedom of religion in Islam is freedom to practice Islam only.

When you drive bank robbers to a bank and they run inside, blow the bank up and kill dozens, you are EQUALLY as guilty of those murders just as if you had gone into the bank and committed these acts yourself. Your hands are drenched in blood of all those murdered or injured in the bank robbery.

All Muslim men who do not repudiate the violent teachings of Islam as well as the violent acts of Muslims were in the “car of Islam” driving the perpetrators to the Boston Massacre. The blood of the 3 who died and the 176 injured is also on their hands.

5 years ago I wrote the following:

By Denying The Existence of Evil You Become An Accomplice To Evil. You Give Evil Legitimacy and Respectability.

By Tolerating Evil You Become An Accomplice To Evil. You Give Evil Legitimacy and Respectability.

You Have A Moral Obligation To Fight Evil.

The President/Congress Have A Moral and Legal Constitutional Duty To Understand The Very Grave Danger Islam Poses To Democracy/ Constitution.

By Denying The Existence of the Evil, that Is Islam – The Blood of The Next 9/11 And All Future Muslim Attacks Will Not Only Be On Their Hands But Also On The Hands of All Muslim Men, The Religious, Media, Intellectual Elites and All Others Supporting Islam.

They are all guilty of TREASON.

I am sorry to say that that evil has reared it’s ugly head once again – in Boston.

The Boston Massacre was the “next 9/11”.

Quran 9:111 is the most evil teaching in history. All those who believe 9:111 become evil. But all Muslims must believe in Quran 9:111 and all the other thousands of teachings of murder, terror, torture, rape, and slavery – otherwise they are no longer “true believer” Muslims. Therefore all such are evil and all are equally guilty.

Let me be clear, there are exceptions: Muslim women and children for a start – they form the largest groups of Islam’s victims. Then there are those ‘Muslims’ who do not believe these evil teachings – the Koran calls such Muslims “hypocrites” and commands the “true-believers” to fight them.

There is a sect within Islam that does repudiate all the violent teachings, they are the “Ahmadis” or “Ahmediyya Muslims”. They are considered “infidels”, “heretics” and even “apostates” by orthodox Sunni and Shia Muslims. In Pakistan they can’t even legally call themselves “Muslims” at all.

You cannot understand Islam without comprehending Verse 9:111 and the crimes of Muhammad.

Muhammad invented Islam and created his own God – the “Allah” of the Quran (the anti-God) and then pretended to receive divine transmissions from Allah via Angel Gabriel. In order to get men who were willing to fight, conquer and die on his behalf, Muhammad, through his fictional god, guaranteed his male followers external sex in Paradise, unlimited sex on earth with sex slaves and 80% of the booty from conquered kafirs. He cleverly concealed his evil ideology by wrapping Islam in a cloak of religious ceremony/practices. This is the true reality of Islam.

ALL MUSLIM MEN WHO DO NOT RENOUNCE THESE TEACHINGS AND LEAVE ISLAM ARE EQUALLY GUILITY AS ARE THOSE WHO SUPPORT ISLAM

The harsh reality in front of us is that unless and until we dis-illusion ourselves of such myths as “self-radicalization” and point the finger at the Islamic teachings (such as verses 9:111, 2:215, 9:5, 9:29) that inspire these ‘radical’ Muslims into perpetrating such senseless mass-murder of innocent infidels, attacks like the 9/11 Massacres and Boston Bombing will continue.

Jake Neuman is the author of “Islam and Sharia Law Are Treason: Jihad Is Treason” and “Prophet Muhammad (AKA ALLAH): Monster of History.” (free download) at http://www.islamreform.net/new-page-210.htm

So fellow American! Regardless of your party affiliation, when are you going to get angry about injustice after injustice and crime after crime perpetrated by this federal government?

Why should you be angry? (Click on the links and see!)

Benghazi cover up – Link

Responsibility for SEALS killed in the wake of the bin Laden operation: ABUSE OF OUR MILITARY PERSONNEL.
Stunning videos, parents of the fallen speak out:
Link 1
Link 2

Federal use of drones killing innocents and spying on citizens – Link

Use of the IRS to engage politics, targeting perceived enemies for special investigations – Link

Surveillance without court order, increased use of FBI to spy on you: Link 1
Link 2

President’s enemies list – Link 1
Link 2
Link 3
Link 4

Illegal efforts to confiscate guns and interfere with your right to self-defense: Link

Creation of a domestic ‘security’ force fully armed to quell domestic disturbance: Government war on the people – Link

Unconstitutional efforts to steal your money to fund the killing of babies in the womb: ObamaCare Trainwreck – Link

Reasons for Impeachment – Link

As if all this isn’t enough:

Unlimited spending, exploding debt, economic devastation, looming bankruptcy, currency devaluation.

Preferential treatment for everyone, except Christians, Tea Party patriots, Republicans, conservatives, libertarians, independents, business people, traditional values coalitions, the Boy Scouts, ProLifers, the Chamber of Commerce, conservative and moderate Democrats, military personnel.

MARCH ON WASHINGTON, D.C.
Justice for the Benghazi Four! Justice for the SEALS!
Respect for the Constitution!
Government of, by and for The People!
September 29, 2013

Allan Lee Erickson

Konrad Adam (photo), speaker for the new Euro-critical “Alternative für Deutschland (Alternative for Germany)” party sees a new chance for conservatism: “People are noticing that progress is becoming less and less worth the price that is more and more being demanded from them. The trees grow, but they don’t grow up to the sky: That defines the renaissance of conservative sense,” the well-known publicist and politician writes for the weekly JUNGE FREIHEIT that appeared today (5/10) in an article worth reading.

All revolutionaries, whether from the left or the right had their gained their access through the promise of some far away, but glorious end time. None of them kept their promise, rather the greatest deceivers caused the greatest catastrophes, Adam said. Conservatives stuck with the Biblical counsel not to swear on anything or anybody. They were mistrusting of and careful regarding “the overfaithful, regardless of color.”

Posted by PI / Translation: Anders Denken

Turkish Airlines has again retracted its ban of lipstick for stewardesses that was stated a few days ago (PI reported). As head of business Temel Kotil (photo) said, the ban was given without consulting with the leadership of THY. “It is null and void,” Kotil said. Critics have long been accusing THY of trying to advance islamization. And so, the airline cut alcoholic beverages from some flights and justified this with lack of requests. Sketches for a new service uniform for the THY cabin personnel have also been criticized as islamic/conservative.

Posted by PI / Translation: Anders Denken

Just recently I was riding streetcar line 23 from Bismarckplatz in the direction of Leimen heading home. I live in Emmertsgrund. Three young men aged beginning/end of their 20s climbed aboard with me and took their place in a compartment of four in front of me. They wore beards and embroidered caps like the Muslims wear when visiting the mosque.

The ride went on like usually until shortly before Rohrbach-Süd. I was reading a book an the three young men were conversing in fluent German without accent, from which could be concluded that they had been schooled in Germany. However, shortly before Rohrbach-Süd, I was getting ready to get off and heard one of them say toward me: “We will exterminate all of you.” And: “We will destroy all of you” (“Alle vernichten,” as shown above in the clipping). When I looked up in amazement and got up to get off, the third one of them said to me: “You will all go to Hell if you don’t accept Allah’s law.” All were staring at the crucifix I had on a chain around my neck and laughed smugly. I got off without saying anything and the three continued on in the direction of Leimen. The question is: Where is that supposed to go?

Christel Golze, Heidelberg

(Source: Rhein-Neckar-Zeitung newspaper, May 2, 2013)

Posted by PI / Translation: Anders Denken

Here once again is an indiscreet example of Egyptian hospitality after the so-called “Arab Spring”: The Egypt vacation of a Zurich family became a nightmare. After a party in the hotel disco, the older daughter was sexually abused by a waiter. (More on blick.ch with English translation below / Photo left: Hotel waiter Emad / Hat Tip: Daniel S.)

“A hotel waiter raped our daughter”

Horror Vacation in Hurghada

The Egypt vacation of a Zurich family became a nightmare. After a party at the hotel disco, the older daughter was sexually abused by a waiter.

She no longer wants to remain silent. She wants to shake things up, to warn. To spare other young women the same fate as her daughter.

Zurich resident Susanna N.* (51) says: “We want justice. And to warn other parents!”

It was supposed to be an unforgettable family vacation in Egypt. At the Hurghada luxury hotel. Susanna N., her partner Nico H.* (34) and the daughters (21 and 16) arrived on April 19th. Five days passed like nothing.

On the evening of April 24th, the family was in a relaxed mood. Hotel waiter Emad (28) did tended the bar. The Egyptian wanted to show the Swiss the Hurghada harbor. “We met Emad later at the Papa’s Beach Disco. When my younger daughter became tired, we returned with her to the hotel,” Susanna N. (51) recounts. Only the 21-year-old M.* and the waiter remained behind.

Mother: “Emad took advantage of our trust”

Susanna N. and Nico H. are regular guests at the Albatross Palace Resort Hotel, have visited there for the tenth time. Know the personnel. “Emad took advantage of our trust,” the mother says.

At the end, M. wished to return from the open air disco to the hotel. The waiter claimed no more taxis are running. “He said he wanted to rush home and get a jacket,” Susanna N. knows. “He told my daughter that he didn’t want to leave her outside. That would be too dangerous.” Flight attendant M. entered the flat with him. “Then he locked the door. The hotel waiter pushed her on to the couch and raped her.”

When Emad finally finished with his victim, he threatened M. “He said his brother-in-law was in the police. She would go to jail if she told anyone about the rape,” the mother said. “At 3:44 a.m., my daughter wrote: ‘Mama!! I am in a taxi, I’m at the end of myself.’ I immediately ran to the reception and waited for her. When I heard what happened, I cried the whole night.”

The family alarms the police and lodges a complaint. The waiter is arrested, the victim heard before court in Hurghada. There M. meets her tormentor again who claims at the hearing that she wanted to kiss him and forced him into sex.

Not the first victim

Emad’s family also appears at the court and wishes to settle the issue out of court. “His brother also said then that Emad had already raped a Polish and a Russian woman and lost jobs in hotels because of this,” Nico H. said.

The family feels let down by the Swiss embassy. “Nobody was reachable for two days. Somebody finally helped us at the German embassy.” The [Swiss] Federal Department for Foreign Affairs has since sent a letter to the family and recommended that they apply for victims’ assistance “due to a tragic incident in Egypt.”

At the end of May, Emad is to be tried. He is under threat of the death penalty. “I hope he is seriously punished,” Nico H. said. “The life of my step-daughter is destroyed; she says she can no longer practice her profession as a flight attendant.”

*Names known to the editorial staff

Posted by PI / Translation: Anders Denken

(By Peter H., Mönchengladbach)

Those who know the Mönchengladbach proletariat folk know that their interests are the same every weekend: Drink till they drop, bellow around the whole night through, and of course, hearty rioting. For the typical historical district visitor, things go best when one can find some kind of a bed – which for this clientele, however, doesn’t present that much of a challenge. These young people unfortunately haven’t advanced any further, at least when considered under evolutionary aspects.

And in the usual way, the Mönchengladbach edition of the “Rheinische Post” newspaper doesn’t report at all what plays out in the historic district every weekend. Faithful reporting about abuses in Mönchengladbach would also not let the reporting of “Our city is diverse and beautiful, only the fight against the Right must continue” by the leftist, politically correct local editorial to fit in with this erstwhile conservative newspaper. It was only due to the factor that the one attacked was a paramedic that there was any reporting about this incident at all.

By the way, this is neither the first and certainly not the worst attack on rescue personnel in the Mönchengladbach historic district: When police tried to put an end to a brawl early Sunday morning on April 24, 2011 in the Old Market at the heights of the Waldhausener Strasse, one of the police officers was attacked by a 26-year-old man. And while the attacker like a madman beat upon the police officer lying on the ground, a crowd gathered and incited and inflamed the thug with shouts of “Do the cop in!”

The assailants from last weekend were able to be identified, thanks to the video surveillance in the Mönchengladbach historic district. The Mönchengladbach “Greens” who have consistently rejected this video surveillance must now be on the defensive in the discussion about it. But truly it has nothing to do with video surveillance, and definitely not with those “Greens” who are traditionally dense anyway.

It has to do with the fact that the residents of this erstwhile beautiful and peaceful quarter have for years had to deal with the riots, the noise, the dirt and the garbage of these boys many times every week. It has to do with the fact that the work of police and medics in this quarter is not only increasingly stressful but also increasingly dangerous. More than all, it has to do with the fact that currently not one single party represented in the Mönchengladbach city council has ever had interest in this issue. And when the “Rheinische Post only gives word when police or paramedics are attacked and otherwise “tolerantly” looks away, then that simply is not enough for a newspaper that calls itself “newspaper for politics and Christian culture.”

Posted by PI / Translation: Anders Denken

Christian Christel Golze of Heidelberg was riding on her way home on streetcar line 3 headed from Bismarckplatz in the direction of Leimen. Three young men with long beards and embroidered caps on their heads climbed aboard. One told her when he saw the cross she was wearing on a chain around her neck: “We will annihilate all of you.” And: “We will exterminate all of you.” Another obliged: “You will all go to Hell if you don’t accept the law of Allah.” Christel made the scandal public by writing a letter to the editor of the Rhein-Neckar Zeitung newspaper, which was also published there. In it she asked the question: “In what direction is this supposed to lead?” (Photo above: burning Christians in Egypt, one of the countries were Moslems have power and are showing the true face of Islam)

(By Michael Stürzenberger)

This question is more than justified. If the appeasing collaborators in politics, media, churches, unions and social clubs continue to roll out the red carpet to Islam without criticism, then this country will have eliminated itself within a few decades according to Sarrazin’s line of argument. That which Christel had to hear from the Moslems is something we have had forced in our ears in similar fashion for a year and a half at our rallies in the streets of the Bavarian capital. With one small exception:

“You Christian pigs! When we finally have power, we’ll hang the whole lot of you!”

“If the police weren’t around, you would long since have been dead!

“You can’t do anything at all; Islam will take power here anyway!”

“We will cut of your head!”

“I will stick a gun in your crotch and pull the trigger!”

“Sooner or later I will ram a knife into your head from behind!”

The worst, though, is this: They mean it. This is precisely in accordance with their ideology of conquest, which – under the guise of a “religion” – has carried out its abominations for 1400 years and at this point has cost the lives of 270 million people. We constantly run into Christians from islamic countries like Iran, Iraq, Syria, Egypt, Dubai and Turkey, as well as Hindus from India and Bhuddists from Thailand and Malaysia who have fled from the worst conditions in their countries.

All of them complain that Islam is catching up with them in the country where they had hoped to find refuge: In Germany. And they strengthen our resolve of carrying on at all costs because it is of such importance that we inform the people.

You can all rest assured: We will carry on and will not let our mouths be stopped by anything or anyone.

Posted by byzanz on PI / Translation: Anders Denken

The Abendzeitung München newspaper has now published a short report about the first day of trial about the Himmler Islam poster. After around five hours of trial, the hearing of several witnesses and detailed examinations, court was adjourned until Monday, May 6th at 12:30. Stürzenberger is showing in the case file picture the core group of the refounded White Rose with Sophie Scholl’s best friend, Susanne Zeller-Hirzel, who continued her battle with the National Socialism by fighting against the congenial ideology of Islam. The poster with the Himmler saying “Islam is very similar to our worldview” was supposed to warn against the return of a similarly fascist ideology in Germany.

The Münchner Abendzeitung even carries the interim national head Stürzenberger, says that the accused held (in the German newspaper article, there is a typo, whether intentional or not that uses the word ‘heilte’ which was part of the Hitler salute and means ‘hail,’ where it should have been hielte, which means ‘held’) up a poster (intentional transposition of letters?), and it misunderstood that they were being accused of a Nazi/Islam comparison instead of using unconstitutional signs, and called Stürzenberger the former press secretary for the minister of education instead of the Munich CSU [Christian Social Union] president Monika Hohlmeier, however, the 13-liner does produce the facts somewhat objectively in the long run:

President of the “Freedom” party and mosque opponent, Michael Stürzenberger, is in court with two political friends for using unconstitutional signs. Each one is to pay a 2000 euro (50 daily installments) order of penalty because at the Marienplatz, they compared Islam with the Nazis and in the process showed Heinrich Himmler in Nazi uniform. Stürzenberger, ex-speaker for former education minister Monika Hohlmeier (CSU), wants an acquittal.

Besides the Abendzeitung, there were also journalists present from the Münchner Merkur and the Süddeutsche Zeitung. Especially enlightening is the fact that the dark activities of “journalist” Tobias Bezler were found out by means of questioning the proprietor of the restaurant that accommodated the BPE meeting before the rally. Thus, according to her statement, he called the restaurant and warned the proprietor about the “right-wing radicals” and threatened to publicize it if they would be allowed to hold their meeting there. What kind of “journalist” is it who would disparage respectable citizens, who would slander an absolutely serious citizen movement that is listed with the German Bundestag and represented in the OSCE, bully restaurant owners and then threaten with public humiliation? In what country do we really live – the GDR? Revealing information about the previous life of this extreme leftist can be found on the internet. Warning: State Security Bezler is watching you…

On the second trial day, Monday, May 6 at 12:30, more witnesses will be heard. The questioning of the previous ones showed that the poster could be seen only around 10-15 seconds before the beginning of the rally because it was taken down immediately after instruction by the police. Since the BPE members insisted that they were going to explain the message of the poster and wanted to be legally sure how they would have to proceed, the machinery of the criminal police and the district attorney in addition fell into action. It was quite surprising for the four participants that a penalty order of 2000 euros for each came out of it. On May 6th, there will be more to clear up, as well as about the negative context of the poster and § 86, paragraph 3 of the penal code. In addition, the judge wants to evaluate the TV documentary “Sarrazin’s Germany,” in which the Munich rally by the Citizen’s Movement Pax Europa (BPE) and the meeting before the rally at the restaurant can be seen. A few impressions of the first trial day are reproduced in the comment thread of this article.

Posted by PI / Translation: Anders Denken

“Oh, happy day” – With these words, the former US president George W. Bush began his speech yesterday (4/25) in Dallas at the opening of the “George W. Bush Presidential Library” named after him. A moving, but also very humorous speech in parts and thus typically American given in the presence of the current and all the still living US presidents. And those who listen carefully to this speech find a – nicely packaged – resounding slap in the face for Obama foreign policy.

(By Peter H., Mönchengladbach)

For the inclined reader, please note “Doubleyuh’s” execution starting at minute 8:37 (video at the end of the article): Bush calls freedom a “gift of God,” he makes it unmistakeably clear that the US must get involved for the expansion of freedom. Words that have no longer been heard for many years now.

George W. Bush might be accused of being too optimistic or naïve in things Islam: he had the vision of reacting to the murder of almost 3,000 people with the democratization of the Arab world. If Islam and democracy would have been compatible, then he would have been immortalized for all time in the history books because of this. If they would have been. Today, we know that Islam and democracy are not compatible with each other. And oddly enough, it hasn’t occurred to those boneheads that his error arose from engaging Islam with too much trust.

Nonetheless, it is to his merit that as president, he made freedom and democracy the central point of his foreign policy, which should be a given for a country like the US but unfortunately was not. We can comfortably proceed with the fact that the leftist yellow journalists didn’t hate him even though he stood up for freedom and democracy, but rather just because he did stand up for freedom and democracy. The jubilation that George W. Bush was greeted with by people in eastern European countries, for example, has always spoken a clearer language than the articles of those left-wing journalists that ridiculed Ronald Reagan for his “Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall.”

However, this agenda of freedom was “corralled” again by Barack H. Obama immediately after his taking office. Instead of strengthening the only democracy in the Arab world (Israel), a foreign policy was begun that had only so-called “stability” as its focus. And we now have clearly seen where this policy leads: to an islamo-fascist regime in Egypt, to the support of Salafists and other jihadists in Syria and last but not least, to the murder of an American ambassador by Salafists in Libya – and that on the anniversary of September 11th. The fact that radical Islam has gotten more aggressive worldwide in the recent past is something that can clearly be put on Obama’s account. It doesn’t make Obama’s action any better that left-wing populist media in Europe or politicians like German foreign minister Westerwelle have helped greatly in this. Becoming the most important supporter of islamofascism is and will remain a declaration of bankrupt foreign policy for a country like the US. And in the ears of the one responsible for this declaration of bankruptcy, George W. Bush’s advocacy for the US to stand up for freedom must have sounded like a slap in the face.

Instead, the question still remains as to who really understood what George W. Bush criticized in this speech. “Doubleyuh,” like before presented his criticism with so much magnanimity and class that dull Bush haters in the German editorial offices presumably didn’t understand the sense of his criticism at all. Barack Hussein Obama, however, might have understood this criticism, but won’t care one iota about it: We can proceed with the fact that the reigning US president will also continue to support islamo-fascist regimes and Salafist “rebels.”

Sometime in the distant future, history will make judgment about the two presidents. And not too much fantasy is need to guess that history, about which the scribblings of leftist German journalists hasn’t cared that much, will judge George Walker Bush more favorably than Barack Hussein Obama.

(Hat Tip: Die Realität)

Posted by PI / Translation: Anders Denken

(By Bill Warner / More on americanthinker.com)

Posted by PI / Translation: Anders Denken

There was a banality of a special kind today in Vienna: 40 people followed a Facebook call by the Chechen group “Pro Tsarnayev” and demonstrated for solidarity with Muslims in general and the Boston attackers specifically. Accusations were also made that the FBI falsified evidence against the Tsarnayev brothers. Men and women demonstrated in an islamically correct way, that is separated from each other. Among the female demonstrators there were Western-clad women as well as fully covered Muslimas. ph

Posted by PI / Translation: Anders Denken

Just how far teenagers were willing to go to get concert tickets for an appearance of their idol was something Anne-Kat Hæland, host of the Norwegian comedy show “Ann kat” wanted to find out. In Oslo’s shopping zone, the following was offered: “Whoever converts to Islam gets free tickets for the next Justin Bieber concert.” “Ann kat” flirts here with the hysteria of young female fans not for lack of a good reason – and was completely validated.

(By L.S.Gabriel)

Young girls were actually found willing to enter this perverse deal. The alleged converts first of all had to remove their makeup. Makeup is not allowed in Islam, they were told. They should put on a traditional hijab, were photographed and afterward had to recite Arabic verses under supervision of a live Salafist dummy. The girls thought it was actually an islamic confession of faith. However, in truth they said, for example “Justin Bieber is unclean and probably homosexual.” (-> See video below)

Svein Tore Bergestuen of the “TV Norge” network justified himself in the interview by not being involved in the production of this fan action: “Anne-Katrine and her crew have all liberties for creating a funny TV show. It is not our duty to question her decision as to what is funny and what isn’t.”

Now, a certain irony doesn’t get lost in determining just how far somebody would go for an object of their desire. And even if the Norwegian Lutheran Bishop Halvor Nordhaug sees a lack of respect with regard to the faith in this action, that it was the matter of a comedy production with hidden camera, and humor, satire and persiflage shouldn’t put a stop for possible religious sensitivities. Because even dogmas of the religious communities should be allowed to be questioned humorously and critically.

However, the action of young girls who were in no way conscious of the scope of consequences in this decision should definitely be considered alarming. Halvor Nordhaug calls this outcome tragic and pitiful, which can definitely be affirmed. It is certainly tragic in a time where Islam currently shows itself to be the greatest threat for peace, freedom and security that young people know so little about it that they would be willing to submit to a misanthropic dictatorship for two hours being supposedly close to an unreachable dream.

And it is pitiful that things are now being chauffered away past a real problem. Because now it is being debated whether television should be allowed to do something like this, which falls under humor, and whether such a thing doesn’t offend religious feelings. This performance of ignorance and naïveté about Islam would, therefore, definitely be a good opportunity to talk finally about how important it is to inform people and how necessary a comprehensive information campaign regarding the danger of a hate and violence ideology cloaked as a religious confession would be.

And TV-Norge should perhaps also draw the right conclusions from this episode, instead of hiding behind phrases now, and use its opportunities because satire sometimes reaches even those who would otherwise be unreachable with such serious subjects.

Posted by PI / Translation: Anders Denken